Detection of Tick-Borne Bacteria from Whole Blood Using 16S Ribosomal RNA Gene PCR Followed by Next-Generation Sequencing.
metagenomics
tick-borne pathogens
Journal
Journal of clinical microbiology
ISSN: 1098-660X
Titre abrégé: J Clin Microbiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7505564
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 04 2021
20 04 2021
Historique:
received:
14
12
2020
accepted:
15
02
2021
pubmed:
26
2
2021
medline:
9
7
2021
entrez:
25
2
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Reported cases of tick-borne diseases have steadily increased for more than a decade. In the United States, a majority of tick-borne infections are caused by bacteria. Clinical diagnosis may be challenging, as tick-borne diseases can present with similar symptoms. Laboratory diagnosis has historically relied on serologic methods, which have limited utility during the acute phase of disease. Pathogen-specific molecular methods have improved early diagnosis, but can be expensive when bundled together and may miss unexpected or novel pathogens. To address these shortcomings, we developed a 16S rRNA gene PCR with a next-generation sequencing (NGS) approach to detect tick-borne bacteria in whole blood. A workflow was optimized by comparing combinations of two extraction platforms and two primer sets, ultimately pursuing DNA extraction from blood with the MagNA Pure 96 and PCR amplification using dual-priming oligonucleotide primers specific to the V1-V3 region of the 16S rRNA gene. The amplified product underwent modified Illumina 16S metagenomics sequencing library preparation and sequencing on a MiSeq V2 Nano flow cell, with data analysis using Pathogenomix RipSeq NGS software. Results with the developed method were compared to those from a V1-V2 16S rRNA gene primer set described by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The V1-V3 assay demonstrated equivalent performance to the CDC assay, with each method showing concordance with targeted PCR results in 31 of 32 samples, and detecting 22 of 23 expected organisms. These data demonstrate the potential for using a broad-range bacterial detection approach for diagnosis of tick-borne bacterial infection from blood.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33627320
pii: JCM.03129-20
doi: 10.1128/JCM.03129-20
pmc: PMC8091845
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
DNA, Bacterial
0
RNA, Ribosomal, 16S
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology.
Références
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2016 May 13;65(2):1-44
pubmed: 27172113
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Oct 21;58(11):
pubmed: 32878948
J Clin Microbiol. 2012 Nov;50(11):3501-8
pubmed: 22895042
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016 Jan;94(1):26-34
pubmed: 26324732
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Oct 21;58(11):
pubmed: 32878950
Lancet Infect Dis. 2016 May;16(5):556-564
pubmed: 26856777
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2008 Dec;62(4):464-6
pubmed: 18947959
J Clin Microbiol. 2012 Apr;50(4):1289-94
pubmed: 22278843
Clin Chem. 2020 Apr 1;66(4):537-548
pubmed: 32232463
J Vector Ecol. 2020 Jun;45(1):147-149
pubmed: 32492273
Emerg Infect Dis. 2015 Oct;21(10):1794-9
pubmed: 26402378