Forkhead transcription factor Fkh1: insights into functional regulatory domains crucial for recruitment of Sin3 histone deacetylase complex.


Journal

Current genetics
ISSN: 1432-0983
Titre abrégé: Curr Genet
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8004904

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2021
Historique:
received: 19 12 2020
accepted: 28 01 2021
revised: 26 01 2021
pubmed: 27 2 2021
medline: 2 9 2021
entrez: 26 2 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Transcription factors are inextricably linked with histone deacetylases leading to compact chromatin. The Forkhead transcription factor Fkh1 is mainly a negative transcriptional regulator which affects cell cycle control, silencing of mating-type cassettes and induction of pseudohyphal growth in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Markedly, Fkh1 impinges chromatin architecture by recruiting large regulatory complexes. Implication of Fkh1 with transcriptional corepressor complexes remains largely unexplored. In this work we show that Fkh1 directly recruits corepressors Sin3 and Tup1 (but not Cyc8), providing evidence for its influence on epigenetic regulation. We also identified the specific domain of Fkh1 mediating Sin3 recruitment and substantiated that amino acids 51-125 of Fkh1 bind PAH2 of Sin3. Importantly, this part of Fkh1 overlaps with its Forkhead-associated domain (FHA). To analyse this domain in more detail, selected amino acids were replaced by alanine, revealing that hydrophobic amino acids L74 and I78 are important for Fkh1-Sin3 binding. In addition, we could prove Fkh1 recruitment to promoters of cell cycle genes CLB2 and SWI5. Notably, Sin3 is also recruited to these promoters but only in the presence of functional Fkh1. Our results disclose that recruitment of Sin3 to Fkh1 requires precisely positioned Fkh1/Sin3 binding sites which provide an extended view on the genetic control of cell cycle genes CLB2 and SWI5 and the mechanism of transcriptional repression by modulation of chromatin architecture at the G2/M transition.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33635403
doi: 10.1007/s00294-021-01158-3
pii: 10.1007/s00294-021-01158-3
pmc: PMC8139909
doi:

Substances chimiques

CLB2 protein, S cerevisiae 0
Cell Cycle Proteins 0
Chromatin 0
Cyclin B 0
Fkh1 protein, S cerevisiae 0
Forkhead Transcription Factors 0
SWI5 protein, S cerevisiae 0
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins 0
Transcription Factors 0
Histone Deacetylases EC 3.5.1.98
Sin3 Histone Deacetylase and Corepressor Complex EC 3.5.1.98

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

487-499

Références

Aref R, Schüller HJ (2020) Functional analysis of Cti6 core domain responsible for recruitment of epigenetic regulators Sin3, Cyc8 and Tup1. Curr Genet 66:1191–1203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00294-020-01109-4
doi: 10.1007/s00294-020-01109-4 pubmed: 32980916 pmcid: 7599196
Bähler J (2005) Cell-cycle control of gene expression in budding and fission yeast. Annu Rev Genet 39:69–94. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genet.39.110304.095808
doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.39.110304.095808 pubmed: 16285853
Burke LJ, Baniahmad A (2000) Co-repressors 2000. FASEB J 14:1876–1888. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.99-0943rev
doi: 10.1096/fj.99-0943rev pubmed: 11023972
Caudron B, Jestin JL (2012) Sequence criteria for the anti-parallel character of protein beta-strands. J Theor Biol 315:146–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.09.011
doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.09.011 pubmed: 23021968
Cobb J, van Attikum H (2010) Mapping genomic targets of DNA helicases by chromatin immunoprecipitation in S. cerevisiae. Methods Mol Biol 587:113–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-355-8_8
doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-355-8_8 pubmed: 20225145
Cole C, Barber JD, Barton GJ (2008) The Jpred 3 secondary structure prediction server. Nucleic Acids Res 36(Web server issue):W197-201. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn238
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn238 pubmed: 18463136 pmcid: 2447793
Darieva Z, Bulmer R, Pic-Taylor A, Doris KS, Geymonat M, Sedgwick SG, Morgan BA, Sharrocks AD (2006) Polo kinase controls cell-cycle-dependent transcription by targeting a coactivator protein. Nature 444:494–498. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05339
doi: 10.1038/nature05339 pubmed: 17122856 pmcid: 1890309
De Antoni A, Gallwitz D (2000) A novel multi-purpose cassette for repeated integrative epitope tagging of genes in S. cerevisiae. Gene 246:179–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1119(00)00083-4
doi: 10.1016/S0378-1119(00)00083-4 pubmed: 10767539
Dummer AM, Su Z, Cherney R, Choi K, Denu J, Zhao X, Fox CA (2016) Binding of the Fkh1 forkhead associated domain to a Phosphopeptide within the Mph1 DNA helicase regulates mating-type switching in budding yeast. PLoS Genet 12:1–22. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006094
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006094
Durocher D, Jackson SP (2002) The FHA domain. FEBS Lett 513:58–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-5793(01)03294-X
doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(01)03294-X pubmed: 11911881
Farhan M, Wang H, Gaur U, Little PJ, Xu J, Zheng W (2017) FOXO signaling pathways as therapeutic targets in cancer. Int J Biol Sci 13:815–827. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.20052
doi: 10.7150/ijbs.20052 pubmed: 28808415 pmcid: 5555100
Grigat M, Jäschke Y, Kliewe F, Pfeifer M, Walz S, Schüller HJ (2012) Multiple histone deacetylases are recruited by corepressor Sin3 and contribute to gene repression mediated by Opi1 regulator of phospholipid biosynthesis in the yeast S. cerevisiae. Mol Genet Genomics 287:461–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00438-012-0692-x
doi: 10.1007/s00438-012-0692-x pubmed: 22543816
Hannenhalli S, Kaestner KH (2009) The evolution of Fox genes and their role in development and disease. Nat Rev Genet 10:233–240. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2523
doi: 10.1038/nrg2523 pubmed: 19274050 pmcid: 2733165
Hanson RM, Prilusky J, Renjian Z, Nakane T, Sussman JL (2013) JSmol and the next-generation web-based representation of 3D molecular structure as applied to proteopedia. Isr J Chem 53:207–216. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijch.201300024
doi: 10.1002/ijch.201300024
Harbison C, Gordon D, Lee T et al (2004) Transcriptional regulatory code of a eukaryotic genome. Nature 431:99–104. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02800
doi: 10.1038/nature02800 pubmed: 15343339 pmcid: 3006441
Ho Y, Gruhler A, Heilbut A et al (2002) Systematic identification of protein complexes in S. cerevisiae by mass spectrometry. Nature 415:180–183. https://doi.org/10.1038/415180a
doi: 10.1038/415180a pubmed: 11805837
Hollenhorst PC, Bose ME, Mielke MR et al (2000) Forkhead genes in transcriptional silencing, cell morphology and the cell cycle: overlapping and distinct functions for FKH1 and FKH2 in S. cerevisiae. Genetics 154:1533–1548
doi: 10.1093/genetics/154.4.1533
James P, Halladay J, Craig EA (1996) Genomic libraries and a host strain designed for highly efficient two-hybrid selection in yeast. Genetics 144:1425–1436
doi: 10.1093/genetics/144.4.1425
Jäschke Y, Schwarz J, Clausnitzer D, Müller C, Schüller HJ (2011) Pleiotropic corepressors Sin3 and Ssn6 interact with repressor Opi1 and negatively regulate transcription of genes required for phospholipid biosynthesis in the yeast S. cerevisiae. Mol Genet Genomics 285:91–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00438-010-0589-5
doi: 10.1007/s00438-010-0589-5 pubmed: 21104417
Jorgensen P, Tyers M (2000) The fork’ed path to mitosis. Genome Biol 1:REVIEWS1022. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2000-1-3-reviews1022
doi: 10.1186/gb-2000-1-3-reviews1022 pubmed: 11277966 pmcid: 138864
Kadosh D, Struhl K (1997) Repression by Ume6 involves recruitment of a complex containing Sin3 corepressor and Rpd3 histone deacetylase to target promoters. Cell 89:365–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80217-2
doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80217-2 pubmed: 9150136
Kelley LA, Mezulis S, Yates CM, Wass MN, Sternberg MJ (2015) The Phyre2 web portal for protein modeling, prediction and analysis. Nat Protoc 10:845–858. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2015.053
doi: 10.1038/nprot.2015.053 pubmed: 25950237 pmcid: 5298202
Kliewe F, Engelhardt M, Aref R, Schüller HJ (2020) Correction to: promoter recruitment of corepressors Sin3 and Cyc8 by activator proteins of the yeast S. cerevisiae. Curr Genet 63:739–750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00294-020-01097-5
doi: 10.1007/s00294-020-01097-5
Kumar R, Reynolds DM, Shevchenko A, Shevchenko A, Goldstone SD, Dalton S (2000) Forkhead transcription factors, Fkh1p and Fkh2p, collaborate with Mcm1p to control transcription required for M-phase. Curr Biol 10:896–906. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00618-7
doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00618-7 pubmed: 10959837
Lalmansingh AS, Karmakar S, Jin Y, Nagaich AK (2012) Multiple modes of chromatin remodeling by Forkhead box proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta 1819:707–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagrm.2012.02.018
doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2012.02.018 pubmed: 22406422
Landry J, Sutton A, Tafrov ST, Heller RC, Stebbins J, Pillus L, Sternglanz R (2000) The silencing protein SIR2 and its homologs are NAD-dependent protein deacetylases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:5807–5811. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.110148297
doi: 10.1073/pnas.110148297 pubmed: 10811920
Linke C, Klipp E, Lehrach H, Barberis M, Krobitsch S (2013) Fkh1 and Fkh2 associate with Sir2 to control CLB2 transcription under normal and oxidative stress conditions. Front Physiol 4:173. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2013.00173
doi: 10.3389/fphys.2013.00173 pubmed: 23874301 pmcid: 3709100
Linke C, Chasapi A, González-Novo A, Al Sawad I, Tognetti S, Klipp E, Loog M, Krobitsch S, Posas F, Xenarios I, Barberis M (2017) A Clb/Cdk1-mediated regulation of Fkh2 synchronizes CLB expression in the budding yeast cell cycle. NPJ Syst Biol Appl 3:7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41540-017-0008-1
doi: 10.1038/s41540-017-0008-1 pubmed: 28649434 pmcid: 5460246
MacIsaac KD, Wang T, Gordon DB, Gifford DK, Stormo GD, Fraenkel E (2006) An improved map of conserved regulatory sites for Saccharomyces cerevisiae. BMC Bioinformatics 7:113. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-113
doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-7-113 pubmed: 16522208 pmcid: 1435934
Malavé TM, Dent SY (2006) Transcriptional repression by Tup1-Ssn6. Biochem Cell Biol 84:437–443. https://doi.org/10.1139/o06-073
doi: 10.1139/o06-073 pubmed: 16936817
Mondeel T, Holland P, Nielsen J, Barberis M (2019) ChIP-exo analysis highlights Fkh1 and Fkh2 transcription factors as hubs that integrate multi-scale networks in budding yeast. Nucleic Acids Res 47:7825–7841. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz603
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz603 pubmed: 31299083 pmcid: 6736057
Mumberg D, Müller R, Funk M (1994) Regulatable promoters of S. cerevisiae: Comparison of transcriptional activity and their use for heterologous expression. Nucleic Acids Res 22:5767–5768. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/22.25.5767
doi: 10.1093/nar/22.25.5767 pubmed: 7838736 pmcid: 310147
Murakami H, Aiba H, Nakanishi M, Murakami-Tonami Y (2010) Regulation of yeast forkhead transcription factors and FoxM1 by cyclin-dependent and polo-like kinases. Cell Cycle 9:3233–3242. https://doi.org/10.4161/cc.9.16.12599
doi: 10.4161/cc.9.16.12599 pubmed: 20716958
Ostrow AZ, Aparicio OM (2017) Identification of Fkh1 and Fkh2 binding site variants associated with dynamically bound DNA elements including replication origins. Nucleus 8:600–604. https://doi.org/10.1080/19491034.2017.1380139
doi: 10.1080/19491034.2017.1380139 pubmed: 29099275 pmcid: 5788546
Ostrow AZ, Nellimoottil T, Knott SR, Fox CA, Tavaré S, Aparicio OM (2014) Fkh1 and Fkh2 bind multiple chromosomal elements in the S. cerevisiae genome with distinct specificities and cell cycle dynamics. PLoS One 9:e87647. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087647
Pic A, Lim FL, Ross SJ, Veal EA, Johnson AL, Sultan MR, West AG, Johnston LH, Sharrocks AD, Morgan BA (2000) The forkhead protein Fkh2 is a component of the yeast cell cycle transcription factor SFF. EMBO J 19:3750–3761. https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/19.14.3750
doi: 10.1093/emboj/19.14.3750 pubmed: 10899128 pmcid: 313965
Postnikoff SDL, Malo ME, Wong B, Harkness TAA (2012) The yeast forkhead transcription factors fkh1 and fkh2 regulate lifespan and stress response together with the anaphase-promoting complex. PLoS Genet 8:e1002583. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002583
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002583 pubmed: 22438832 pmcid: 3305399
Reinapae A, Jalakas K, Avvakumov N, Lõoke M, Kristjuhan K, Kristjuhan A (2017) Recruitment of Fkh1 to replication origins requires precisely positioned Fkh1/2 binding sites and concurrent assembly of the pre-replicative complex. PLoS Genet 13:e1006588. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006588
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006588 pubmed: 28141805 pmcid: 5308776
Reynolds D, Shi BJ, McLean C, Katsis F, Kemp B, Dalton S (2003) Recruitment of Thr 319-phosphorylated Ndd1p to the FHA domain of Fkh2p requires Clb kinase activity: a mechanism for CLB cluster gene activation. Genes Dev 17:1789–1802. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1074103
doi: 10.1101/gad.1074103 pubmed: 12865300 pmcid: 196186
Sahu SC, Swanson KA, Kang RS, Huang K, Brubaker K, Ratcliff K, Radhakrishnan I (2008) Conserved themes in target recognition by the PAH1 and PAH2 domains of the Sin3 transcriptional corepressor. J Mol Biol 375:1444–1456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2007.11.079
doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.11.079 pubmed: 18089292
Schwank S, Ebbert R, Rautenstrauss K, Schweizer E, Schüller HJ (1995) Yeast transcriptional activator INO2 interacts as an Ino2p/Ino4p basic helix-loop-helix heteromeric complex with the inositol/choline-responsive element necessary for expression of phospholipid biosynthetic genes in S. cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res 23:230–237. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/23.2.230
doi: 10.1093/nar/23.2.230 pubmed: 7862526 pmcid: 306659
Sherriff JA, Kent NA, Mellor J (2007) The Isw2 chromatin-remodeling ATPase cooperates with the Fkh2 transcription factor to repress transcription of the B-type cyclin Gene CLB2. Mol Cell Biol 27:2848–2860. https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.01798-06
doi: 10.1128/mcb.01798-06 pubmed: 17283050 pmcid: 1899929
Shi BJ (2016) Decoding common and divergent cellular functions of the domains of forkhead transcription factors Fkh1 and Fkh2. Biochem J 473:3855–3869. https://doi.org/10.1042/BCJ20160609
doi: 10.1042/BCJ20160609 pubmed: 27555611
Silverstein RA, Ekwall K (2005) Sin3 A flexible regulator of global gene expression and genome stability. Curr Genet 47:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00294-004-0541-5
doi: 10.1007/s00294-004-0541-5 pubmed: 15565322
Storz P (2011) Forkhead homeobox type O transcription factors in the responses to oxidative stress. Antioxid Redox Signal 14:593–605. https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2010.3405
doi: 10.1089/ars.2010.3405 pubmed: 20618067 pmcid: 3038124
Szklarczyk D, Gable AL, Lyon D et al (2019) STRING v11: protein-protein association networks with increased coverage, supporting functional discovery in genome-wide experimental datasets. Nucleic Acids Res 47:D607–D613. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky1131
doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1131
Váchová L, Palková Z (2019) Diverse roles of Tup1p and Cyc8p transcription regulators in the development of distinct types of yeast populations. Curr Genet 65:147–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00294-018-0883-z
doi: 10.1007/s00294-018-0883-z pubmed: 30191307
van der Horst A, Burgering BM (2007) Stressing the role of FoxO proteins in lifespan and disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 8:440–450. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm2190
doi: 10.1038/nrm2190 pubmed: 17522590
Veis J, Klug H, Koranda M, Ammerer G (2007) Activation of the G2/M-specific gene CLB2 requires multiple cell cycle signals. Mol Cell Biol 27:8364–8373. https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.01253-07
doi: 10.1128/mcb.01253-07 pubmed: 17908798 pmcid: 2169163
Wagner C, Dietz M, Wittmann J, Albrecht A, Schüller HJ (2001) The negative regulator Opi1 of phospholipid biosynthesis in yeast contacts the pleiotropic repressor Sin3 and the transcriptional activator Ino2. Mol Microbiol 41:155–166. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02495.x
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02495.x pubmed: 11454208
Wang H, Stillman DJ (1993) Transcriptional repression in S. cerevisiae by a SIN3-LexA fusion protein. Mol Cell Biol 13:1805–1814. https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.13.3.1805
doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.3.1805 pubmed: 8441414 pmcid: 359493
Wang H, Clark I, Nicholson PR, Herskowitz I, Stillman DJ (1990) The S. cerevisiae SIN3 gene, a negative regulator of HO, contains four paired amphipathic helix motifs. Mol Cell Biol 10:5927–5936. https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.10.11.5927
doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.11.5927 pubmed: 2233725 pmcid: 361389
Wang ZX, Wu C, Lei H, Duan Y (2007) Accurate ab initio study on the hydrogen-bond pairs in protein secondary structures. J Chem Theory Comput 3:1527–1537. https://doi.org/10.1021/ct700021f
doi: 10.1021/ct700021f pubmed: 26221082 pmcid: 4515431
Xiong Y, Svingen PA, Sarmento OO, Smyrk TC, Dave M, Khanna S, Lomberk GA, Urrutia RA, Faubion WA Jr (2014) Differential coupling of KLF10 to Sin3-HDAC and PCAF regulates the inducibility of the FOXP3 gene. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 307:R608–R620. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00085.2014
doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00085.2014 pubmed: 24944246 pmcid: 4166759
Yang XJ, Seto E (2008) The Rpd3/Hda1 family of lysine deacetylases: from bacteria and yeast to mice and men. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 9:206–218. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm2346
doi: 10.1038/nrm2346 pubmed: 18292778 pmcid: 2667380
Zhao YL, Wu YD (2002) A theoretical study of beta-sheet models: is the formation of hydrogen-bond networks cooperative? J Am Chem Soc 124:1570–1571. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja016230a
doi: 10.1021/ja016230a pubmed: 11853419
Zhu G, Spellman PT, Volpe T, Brown PO, Botstein D, Davis TN, Futcher B (2000) Two yeast forkhead genes regulate the cell cycle and pseudohyphal growth. Nature 406:90–94. https://doi.org/10.1038/35017581
doi: 10.1038/35017581 pubmed: 10894548

Auteurs

Rasha Aref (R)

Department of Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, Ain Shams University, Shoubra El-Khaymah, Cairo, 11241, Egypt. rasha_aref@agr.asu.edu.eg.
Center for Functional Genomics of Microbes, Abteilung Molekulare Genetik Und Infektionsbiologie, Felix-Hausdorff-Straße 8, 17487, Greifswald, Germany. rasha_aref@agr.asu.edu.eg.

Marwa N M E Sanad (MNME)

Department of Genetics and Cytology, National Research Centre, Cairo, Dokki, Egypt.

Hans-Joachim Schüller (HJ)

Center for Functional Genomics of Microbes, Abteilung Molekulare Genetik Und Infektionsbiologie, Felix-Hausdorff-Straße 8, 17487, Greifswald, Germany.

Articles similaires

Adenosine Triphosphate Adenosine Diphosphate Mitochondrial ADP, ATP Translocases Binding Sites Mitochondria
Biofilms Candida albicans Quorum Sensing Candida glabrata Menthol

Conservation of the cooling agent binding pocket within the TRPM subfamily.

Kate Huffer, Matthew C S Denley, Elisabeth V Oskoui et al.
1.00
TRPM Cation Channels Animals Binding Sites Mice Pyrimidinones

Classifications MeSH