Outcomes 2 Years After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients at Low Surgical Risk.


Journal

Journal of the American College of Cardiology
ISSN: 1558-3597
Titre abrégé: J Am Coll Cardiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8301365

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 03 2021
Historique:
received: 19 11 2020
revised: 23 12 2020
accepted: 28 12 2020
entrez: 5 3 2021
pubmed: 6 3 2021
medline: 28 9 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

In low surgical risk patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis, the PARTNER 3 (Safety and Effectiveness of the SAPIEN 3 Transcatheter Heart Valve in Low Risk Patients With Aortic Stenosis) trial demonstrated superiority of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) versus surgery for the primary endpoint of death, stroke, or re-hospitalization at 1 year. This study determined both clinical and echocardiographic outcomes between 1 and 2 years in the PARTNER 3 trial. This study randomly assigned 1,000 patients (1:1) to transfemoral TAVR with the SAPIEN 3 valve versus surgery (mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score: 1.9%; mean age: 73 years) with clinical and echocardiography follow-up at 30 days and at 1 and 2 years. This study assessed 2-year rates of the primary endpoint and several secondary endpoints (clinical, echocardiography, and quality-of-life measures) in this as-treated analysis. Primary endpoint follow-up at 2 years was available in 96.5% of patients. The 2-year primary endpoint was significantly reduced after TAVR versus surgery (11.5% vs. 17.4%; hazard ratio: 0.63; 95% confidence interval: 0.45 to 0.88; p = 0.007). Differences in death and stroke favoring TAVR at 1 year were not statistically significant at 2 years (death: TAVR 2.4% vs. surgery 3.2%; p = 0.47; stroke: TAVR 2.4% vs. surgery 3.6%; p = 0.28). Valve thrombosis at 2 years was increased after TAVR (2.6%; 13 events) compared with surgery (0.7%; 3 events; p = 0.02). Disease-specific health status continued to be better after TAVR versus surgery through 2 years. Echocardiographic findings, including hemodynamic valve deterioration and bioprosthetic valve failure, were similar for TAVR and surgery at 2 years. At 2 years, the primary endpoint remained significantly lower with TAVR versus surgery, but initial differences in death and stroke favoring TAVR were diminished and patients who underwent TAVR had increased valve thrombosis. (Safety and Effectiveness of the SAPIEN 3 Transcatheter Heart Valve in Low Risk Patients With Aortic Stenosis [PARTNER 3]; NCT02675114).

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
In low surgical risk patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis, the PARTNER 3 (Safety and Effectiveness of the SAPIEN 3 Transcatheter Heart Valve in Low Risk Patients With Aortic Stenosis) trial demonstrated superiority of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) versus surgery for the primary endpoint of death, stroke, or re-hospitalization at 1 year.
OBJECTIVES
This study determined both clinical and echocardiographic outcomes between 1 and 2 years in the PARTNER 3 trial.
METHODS
This study randomly assigned 1,000 patients (1:1) to transfemoral TAVR with the SAPIEN 3 valve versus surgery (mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score: 1.9%; mean age: 73 years) with clinical and echocardiography follow-up at 30 days and at 1 and 2 years. This study assessed 2-year rates of the primary endpoint and several secondary endpoints (clinical, echocardiography, and quality-of-life measures) in this as-treated analysis.
RESULTS
Primary endpoint follow-up at 2 years was available in 96.5% of patients. The 2-year primary endpoint was significantly reduced after TAVR versus surgery (11.5% vs. 17.4%; hazard ratio: 0.63; 95% confidence interval: 0.45 to 0.88; p = 0.007). Differences in death and stroke favoring TAVR at 1 year were not statistically significant at 2 years (death: TAVR 2.4% vs. surgery 3.2%; p = 0.47; stroke: TAVR 2.4% vs. surgery 3.6%; p = 0.28). Valve thrombosis at 2 years was increased after TAVR (2.6%; 13 events) compared with surgery (0.7%; 3 events; p = 0.02). Disease-specific health status continued to be better after TAVR versus surgery through 2 years. Echocardiographic findings, including hemodynamic valve deterioration and bioprosthetic valve failure, were similar for TAVR and surgery at 2 years.
CONCLUSIONS
At 2 years, the primary endpoint remained significantly lower with TAVR versus surgery, but initial differences in death and stroke favoring TAVR were diminished and patients who underwent TAVR had increased valve thrombosis. (Safety and Effectiveness of the SAPIEN 3 Transcatheter Heart Valve in Low Risk Patients With Aortic Stenosis [PARTNER 3]; NCT02675114).

Identifiants

pubmed: 33663731
pii: S0735-1097(21)00007-3
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.12.052
pii:
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02675114']

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1149-1161

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Funding Support and Author Disclosures The PARTNER 3 Trial was funded by Edwards Lifesciences. Dr. Leon has received grant support, paid to his institution, from Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Abbott, and Boston Scientific; and has received advisory board fees from Medtronic, Abbott, Boston Scientific, Gore, and Meril Life Sciences. Dr. Mack has received consulting fees from Gore; has served as a trial coprimary investigator for Edwards Lifesciences and Abbott; and has served as a study chair for Medtronic. Dr. Hahn has received consulting fees from Abbott Vascular, Siemens Healthineers, Boston Scientific, Bayliss, Edwards Lifesciences, Philips Healthcare, 3Mensio, Medtronic, and Navigate. Dr. Thourani has received grant support and has served as an advisor for Edwards Lifesciences. Dr. Makkar has received grant support from Abbott and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr. Kodali holds equity in BioTrace Medical, Dura Biotech, and Thubrikar Aortic Valve; has received grant support from Medtronic and Boston Scientific; has received grant support and consulting fees from Abbott Vascular; and has received consulting fees from Claret Medical, Admedus, and Meril Life Sciences. Ms. Alu has received research funding, paid to her institution, from Edwards Lifesciences and Abbott. Dr. Russo has received consulting fees, lecture fees, and fees for serving as a proctor from Edwards Lifesciences; has received consulting fees and fees for serving as a proctor from Abbott; and has received consulting fees from Boston Scientific. Dr. Malaisrie has received consulting fees from Medtronic; and has received lecture fees from Abbott. Dr. Cohen has received grant support, paid to his institution, from Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Abbott Vascular; and has received consulting fees from Edwards Lifesciences and Medtronic. Dr. Blanke has received consulting fees from Edwards Lifesciences, Tendyne (Abbott), Circle Cardiovascular Imaging, Neovasc, and Gore. Dr. Leipsic has received grant support from Abbott and Medtronic; and has received consulting fees and holds stock options from Circle Cardiovascular Imaging. Dr. McCabe has received consulting fees from Edwards Lifesciences. Dr. Babaliaros has received lecture fees and consulting fees from Edwards Lifesciences and Abbott. Dr. Goldman has received advisory board fees from Edwards Lifesciences. Dr. Szeto has received lecture fees and has served as an investigator for Edwards Lifesciences. Dr. Genereux has received consulting fees and advisory board fees from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Cardiovascular Solutions, and Cordis; has received consulting fees and fees for serving as a proctor from Edwards Lifesciences; and has received consulting fees from Medtronic, Saranas, Pi-Cardia, and Sig.Num. Dr. Webb has received consulting fees and fees for serving as a proctor from Edwards Lifesciences. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Auteurs

Martin B Leon (MB)

Columbia University Irving Medical Center/NewYork Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA; Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York, USA. Electronic address: ml2398@cumc.columbia.edu.

Michael J Mack (MJ)

Baylor Scott & White Health, Plano, Texas, USA.

Rebecca T Hahn (RT)

Columbia University Irving Medical Center/NewYork Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA; Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York, USA.

Vinod H Thourani (VH)

Piedmont Heart Institute, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Raj Makkar (R)

Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Susheel K Kodali (SK)

Columbia University Irving Medical Center/NewYork Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA.

Maria C Alu (MC)

Columbia University Irving Medical Center/NewYork Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA; Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York, USA.

Mahesh V Madhavan (MV)

Columbia University Irving Medical Center/NewYork Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA; Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York, USA.

Katherine H Chau (KH)

Columbia University Irving Medical Center/NewYork Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA.

Mark Russo (M)

Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.

Samir R Kapadia (SR)

Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

S Chris Malaisrie (SC)

Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

David J Cohen (DJ)

University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.

Philipp Blanke (P)

St. Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Jonathon A Leipsic (JA)

St. Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Mathew R Williams (MR)

NYU-Langone Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.

James M McCabe (JM)

University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

David L Brown (DL)

Baylor Scott & White Health, Plano, Texas, USA.

Vasilis Babaliaros (V)

Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Scott Goldman (S)

Lankenau Institute for Medical Research, Main Line Health, Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, USA.

Howard C Herrmann (HC)

University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Wilson Y Szeto (WY)

University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Philippe Genereux (P)

Gagnon Cardiovascular Institute, Morristown Medical Center, Morristown, New Jersey, USA.

Ashish Pershad (A)

University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.

Michael Lu (M)

Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California, USA.

John G Webb (JG)

St. Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Craig R Smith (CR)

Columbia University Irving Medical Center/NewYork Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA.

Philippe Pibarot (P)

Department of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, Quebec, Canada.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH