Deficits in musical rhythm perception in children with specific learning disabilities.
Rhythm perception
dyslexia
language
specific learning disability
Journal
NeuroRehabilitation
ISSN: 1878-6448
Titre abrégé: NeuroRehabilitation
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9113791
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
pubmed:
6
3
2021
medline:
4
5
2021
entrez:
5
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A specific learning disability comes with a cluster of deficits in the neurocognitive domain. Phonological processing deficits have been the core of different types of specific learning disabilities. In addition to difficulties in phonological processing and cognitive deficits, children with specific learning disability (SLD) are known to have deficits in more innate non-language-based skills like musical rhythm processing. This paper reviews studies in the area of musical rhythm perception in children with SLD. An attempt was made to throw light on beneficial effects of music and rhythm-based intervention and their underlying mechanism. A hypothesis-driven review of research in the domain of rhythm deficits and rhythm-based intervention in children with SLD was carried out. A summary of the reviewed literature highlights that music and language processing have shared neural underpinnings. Children with SLD in addition to difficulties in language processing and other neurocognitive deficits are known to have deficits in music and rhythm perception. This is explained in the background of deficits in auditory skills, perceptuo-motor skills and timing skills. Attempt has been made in the field to understand the effect of music training on the children's auditory processing and language development. Music and rhythm-based intervention emerges as a powerful intervention method to target language processing and other neurocognitive functions. Future studies in this direction are highly underscored. Suggestions for future research on music-based interventions have been discussed.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
A specific learning disability comes with a cluster of deficits in the neurocognitive domain. Phonological processing deficits have been the core of different types of specific learning disabilities. In addition to difficulties in phonological processing and cognitive deficits, children with specific learning disability (SLD) are known to have deficits in more innate non-language-based skills like musical rhythm processing.
OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVE
This paper reviews studies in the area of musical rhythm perception in children with SLD. An attempt was made to throw light on beneficial effects of music and rhythm-based intervention and their underlying mechanism.
METHODS
METHODS
A hypothesis-driven review of research in the domain of rhythm deficits and rhythm-based intervention in children with SLD was carried out.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A summary of the reviewed literature highlights that music and language processing have shared neural underpinnings. Children with SLD in addition to difficulties in language processing and other neurocognitive deficits are known to have deficits in music and rhythm perception. This is explained in the background of deficits in auditory skills, perceptuo-motor skills and timing skills. Attempt has been made in the field to understand the effect of music training on the children's auditory processing and language development. Music and rhythm-based intervention emerges as a powerful intervention method to target language processing and other neurocognitive functions. Future studies in this direction are highly underscored.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Suggestions for future research on music-based interventions have been discussed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33664156
pii: NRE208013
doi: 10.3233/NRE-208013
pmc: PMC7613144
mid: EMS150883
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
187-193Subventions
Organisme : DBT-Wellcome Trust India Alliance
ID : IA/CPHI/17/1/503348
Pays : India
Références
Children (Basel). 2019 Aug 08;6(8):
pubmed: 31398926
J Learn Disabil. 1991 Jan;24(1):58-62
pubmed: 1997629
J Physiol Paris. 2008 Jan-May;102(1-3):120-9
pubmed: 18448317
Neurosci Lett. 2004 Jan 16;354(3):193-6
pubmed: 14700729
Adv Cogn Psychol. 2011;7:1-6
pubmed: 21614212
J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Oct;124(4):2263-71
pubmed: 19062864
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009 Jul;1169:46-57
pubmed: 19673754
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Oct;21:1-14
pubmed: 27490304
Psychol Rep. 2015 Feb;116(1):13-22
pubmed: 25650644
Neuropsychologia. 2020 Feb 17;138:107324
pubmed: 31877312
Neuroreport. 2004 Jun 7;15(8):1255-9
pubmed: 15167544
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Jun 04;8:392
pubmed: 24926248
Front Psychol. 2019 May 24;10:1198
pubmed: 31178805
Dev Sci. 2012 May;15(3):398-407
pubmed: 22490179
Brain. 2006 Oct;129(Pt 10):2593-608
pubmed: 16959812
Cereb Cortex. 2018 Dec 1;28(12):4336-4347
pubmed: 29126181
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Aug 6;99(16):10911-6
pubmed: 12142463
Brain Sci. 2014 Jun 17;4(2):428-52
pubmed: 24961770
Front Psychol. 2011 Jun 09;2:110
pubmed: 21713060
Psychophysiology. 2004 May;41(3):341-9
pubmed: 15102118
J Exp Child Psychol. 2002 Oct;83(2):111-30
pubmed: 12408958
Front Psychol. 2011 Jun 29;2:142
pubmed: 21747773
Front Syst Neurosci. 2014 May 13;8:57
pubmed: 24860439
Cognition. 2003 Feb;87(1):B35-45
pubmed: 12499110
Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 10;10:2888
pubmed: 31998179
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Sep 16;105(37):14222-7
pubmed: 18768785
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Mar 19;370(1664):20140090
pubmed: 25646513
Neuroimage. 2002 Oct;17(2):956-66
pubmed: 12377169
Psychol Rev. 1989 Jul;96(3):459-91
pubmed: 2756068
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2005 Dec;1060:219-30
pubmed: 16597769
Lancet. 2004 May 1;363(9419):1451-60
pubmed: 15121410
Dyslexia. 2003 Feb;9(1):18-36
pubmed: 12625374
Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 03;11:1158
pubmed: 32581961