True conversions from RAS mutant to RAS wild-type in circulating tumor DNA from metastatic colorectal cancer patients as assessed by methylation and mutational signature.
Adult
Aged
Antineoplastic Agents
/ therapeutic use
Circulating Tumor DNA
/ blood
Colorectal Neoplasms
/ blood
DNA Methylation
DNA Mutational Analysis
Disease Progression
ErbB Receptors
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Female
GTP Phosphohydrolases
/ genetics
Gene Expression Profiling
Genetic Predisposition to Disease
High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
Humans
Liquid Biopsy
Male
Membrane Proteins
/ genetics
Middle Aged
Mutation
Neoplasm Metastasis
Phenotype
Progression-Free Survival
Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)
/ genetics
Transcriptome
Circulating tumor DNA
Colorectal cancer
EGFR blockade
Methylation
RAS conversion
Journal
Cancer letters
ISSN: 1872-7980
Titre abrégé: Cancer Lett
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 7600053
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 06 2021
01 06 2021
Historique:
received:
03
02
2021
revised:
11
03
2021
accepted:
12
03
2021
pubmed:
22
3
2021
medline:
21
10
2021
entrez:
21
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The paucity of targeted treatments available in patients with RAS mutant colorectal cancers contributes to the poor prognosis of this patient group compared to those with RAS wild-type disease. Recent liquid biopsy-driven studies have demonstrated that RAS mutant clones might disappear in plasma during the clonal evolution of the disease, opening new unforeseen perspectives for EGFR blockade in these patients. Nevertheless, the lack of detection of RAS mutations in plasma might depend on the low amount of released circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), making it necessary a more accurate selection of patients with true RAS mutation conversions. In this liquid biopsy-based study, we assessed RAS mutational status in initially RAS-mutant patients at the time of progressive disease from any line of therapy and investigated the incidence of true conversions to plasma RAS wild-type, comparing a colon cancer specific methylation profile with a mutational signature of ctDNA. Globally, considering either mutational panel or methylation profile as reliable tests to confirm or exclude the presence of ctDNA, the percentage of "true RAS converters" was 37.5%. In our series we observed a trend toward a better PFS in patients who received anti-EGFR as second or subsequent treatment lines compared to those who did not.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33744389
pii: S0304-3835(21)00119-1
doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2021.03.014
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antineoplastic Agents
0
Circulating Tumor DNA
0
KRAS protein, human
0
Membrane Proteins
0
EGFR protein, human
EC 2.7.10.1
ErbB Receptors
EC 2.7.10.1
GTP Phosphohydrolases
EC 3.6.1.-
NRAS protein, human
EC 3.6.1.-
Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)
EC 3.6.5.2
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
89-96Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.