The capacity of origins to load MCM establishes replication timing patterns.


Journal

PLoS genetics
ISSN: 1553-7404
Titre abrégé: PLoS Genet
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101239074

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 2021
Historique:
received: 01 12 2020
accepted: 04 03 2021
revised: 06 04 2021
pubmed: 26 3 2021
medline: 3 8 2021
entrez: 25 3 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Loading of the MCM replicative helicase at origins of replication is a highly regulated process that precedes DNA replication in all eukaryotes. The stoichiometry of MCM loaded at origins has been proposed to be a key determinant of when those origins initiate replication during S phase. Nevertheless, the genome-wide regulation of MCM loading stoichiometry and its direct effect on replication timing remain unclear. In order to investigate why some origins load more MCM than others, we perturbed MCM levels in budding yeast cells and, for the first time, directly measured MCM levels and replication timing in the same experiment. Reduction of MCM levels through degradation of Mcm4, one of the six obligate components of the MCM complex, slowed progression through S phase and increased sensitivity to replication stress. Reduction of MCM levels also led to differential loading at origins during G1, revealing origins that are sensitive to reductions in MCM and others that are not. Sensitive origins loaded less MCM under normal conditions and correlated with a weak ability to recruit the origin recognition complex (ORC). Moreover, reduction of MCM loading at specific origins of replication led to a delay in their replication during S phase. In contrast, overexpression of MCM had no effects on cell cycle progression, relative MCM levels at origins, or replication timing, suggesting that, under optimal growth conditions, cellular MCM levels are not limiting for MCM loading. Our results support a model in which the loading capacity of origins is the primary determinant of MCM stoichiometry in wild-type cells, but that stoichiometry is controlled by origins' ability to recruit ORC and compete for MCM when MCM becomes limiting.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33764973
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009467
pii: PGENETICS-D-20-01814
pmc: PMC8023499
doi:

Substances chimiques

Indoleacetic Acids 0
Origin Recognition Complex 0
DNA Helicases EC 3.6.4.-
Minichromosome Maintenance Proteins EC 3.6.4.12

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e1009467

Subventions

Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R01 GM098815
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R01 GM125872
Pays : United States

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

J Cell Biol. 2006 Jun 5;173(5):673-83
pubmed: 16754955
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2013 Aug 01;5(8):a010132
pubmed: 23838440
Genes (Basel). 2019 Mar 06;10(3):
pubmed: 30845782
Nature. 2003 Oct 16;425(6959):737-41
pubmed: 14562106
Genes Dev. 2007 Dec 15;21(24):3331-41
pubmed: 18079179
Genes Dev. 2015 Jan 15;29(2):212-24
pubmed: 25593310
Genome Biol Evol. 2011;3:799-811
pubmed: 21666225
Genetics. 2008 Dec;180(4):1833-47
pubmed: 18832352
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2003 Jan;4(1):25-32
pubmed: 12511866
Bioessays. 2016 Jul;38(7):613-7
pubmed: 27174869
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Jul 1;105(26):8956-61
pubmed: 18579778
EMBO J. 2011 Nov 11;30(23):4805-14
pubmed: 22081107
Nature. 2003 Oct 16;425(6959):686-91
pubmed: 14562095
Science. 2007 Mar 9;315(5817):1405-8
pubmed: 17347438
Cell. 2015 Apr 23;161(3):513-525
pubmed: 25892223
Cell. 2012 Jan 20;148(1-2):99-111
pubmed: 22265405
Mol Cell. 2013 Apr 11;50(1):123-35
pubmed: 23562327
Nat Cell Biol. 2009 Mar;11(3):357-62
pubmed: 19182789
Science. 2017 Jul 21;357(6348):314-318
pubmed: 28729513
Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2019 Dec;59:195-204
pubmed: 31630057
Genes Dev. 2010 Jun 15;24(12):1208-19
pubmed: 20551170
Mol Cell Biol. 2000 May;20(9):3086-96
pubmed: 10757793
Nucleic Acids Res. 2012 Jan;40(Database issue):D682-6
pubmed: 22121216
Genes Dev. 2014 Feb 15;28(4):372-83
pubmed: 24532715
Cell. 2009 Nov 13;139(4):719-30
pubmed: 19896182
Genetics. 2016 Jul;203(3):1027-67
pubmed: 27384026
Mol Syst Biol. 2010 Aug 24;6:404
pubmed: 20739926
Nat Cell Biol. 2002 Mar;4(3):198-207
pubmed: 11836525
Nature. 2001 Jun 28;411(6841):1068-73
pubmed: 11429609
Cell Syst. 2018 Feb 28;6(2):192-205.e3
pubmed: 29361465
Mol Cell. 2012 Mar 9;45(5):696-704
pubmed: 22325992
Nature. 2019 Nov;575(7784):704-710
pubmed: 31748745
Mol Cell. 2004 Dec 22;16(6):967-78
pubmed: 15610739
J Biol Chem. 2002 Sep 6;277(36):33049-57
pubmed: 12087101
Nature. 2018 Jul;559(7713):217-222
pubmed: 29973722
Genes Dev. 2010 Apr 15;24(8):748-53
pubmed: 20351051
Nucleic Acids Res. 2010 Sep;38(17):5623-33
pubmed: 20457753
J Cell Biol. 2012 Jan 23;196(2):233-46
pubmed: 22249291
Chromosome Res. 2010 Jan;18(1):35-43
pubmed: 20205352
Nucleic Acids Res. 2014 Jan;42(1):e3
pubmed: 24089142
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Nov 8;108(45):18318-23
pubmed: 22025700
J Cell Biol. 2017 Jul 3;216(7):1907-1914
pubmed: 28539386
PLoS Genet. 2013;9(9):e1003798
pubmed: 24068963
Curr Biol. 2011 Dec 20;21(24):2055-63
pubmed: 22169533
Curr Protoc Cell Biol. 2014 Sep 02;64:20.9.1-16
pubmed: 25181302
Nat Methods. 2009 Dec;6(12):917-22
pubmed: 19915560
Genome Res. 2015 Dec;25(12):1886-92
pubmed: 26359232
PLoS Genet. 2019 Oct 4;15(10):e1008430
pubmed: 31584938
Genes Dev. 2006 Jul 15;20(14):1874-9
pubmed: 16847347
Mol Biol Cell. 2011 May 15;22(10):1753-65
pubmed: 21441303
Genetics. 1984 Mar;106(3):365-85
pubmed: 6323245
Mol Biol Cell. 2001 Nov;12(11):3658-67
pubmed: 11694596
FEBS Lett. 2005 Feb 7;579(4):877-84
pubmed: 15680967
Genes Dev. 2011 Feb 15;25(4):363-72
pubmed: 21289063
Mol Cell Biol. 1996 Sep;16(9):5081-90
pubmed: 8756666
Nat Protoc. 2020 Mar;15(3):1255-1284
pubmed: 32051615
Methods Enzymol. 2012;513:233-50
pubmed: 22929772
Genes Dev. 2009 May 1;23(9):1077-90
pubmed: 19417103
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 May 27;94(11):5611-6
pubmed: 9159120
Mol Cell. 2013 Jun 6;50(5):661-74
pubmed: 23746350
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2010;75:143-53
pubmed: 21139067
Genome Res. 2012 Oct;22(10):1953-62
pubmed: 22767388
BMC Genomics. 2006 Oct 26;7:276
pubmed: 17067396

Auteurs

Livio Dukaj (L)

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, University of Massachusetts Medical School Worcester, Massachusetts, United States of America.

Nicholas Rhind (N)

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, University of Massachusetts Medical School Worcester, Massachusetts, United States of America.

Articles similaires

High-throughput Bronchus-on-a-Chip system for modeling the human bronchus.

Akina Mori, Marjolein Vermeer, Lenie J van den Broek et al.
1.00
Humans Bronchi Lab-On-A-Chip Devices Epithelial Cells Goblet Cells

Conservation of the cooling agent binding pocket within the TRPM subfamily.

Kate Huffer, Matthew C S Denley, Elisabeth V Oskoui et al.
1.00
TRPM Cation Channels Animals Binding Sites Mice Pyrimidinones
Fucosyltransferases Drug Repositioning Molecular Docking Simulation Molecular Dynamics Simulation Humans
Rhizosphere Glycine max Seeds Soybean Oil Soil Microbiology

Classifications MeSH