Change in Kidney Function and 2-Year Mortality After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.
Aged, 80 and over
Aortic Valve Stenosis
/ surgery
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Glomerular Filtration Rate
/ physiology
Humans
Israel
/ epidemiology
Kidney
/ physiopathology
Male
Postoperative Complications
/ etiology
Prognosis
Registries
Renal Insufficiency, Chronic
/ etiology
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
/ methods
Risk Factors
Survival Rate
/ trends
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
/ methods
Journal
JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 03 2021
01 03 2021
Historique:
entrez:
26
3
2021
pubmed:
27
3
2021
medline:
9
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is prevalent in the population of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Data on the association of TAVR with kidney function are scarce, as are data on the relationship between changes in kidney function after TAVR and mortality. To describe the changes in kidney function (both periprocedural and at steady state) after TAVR and to explore the association of TAVR with midterm mortality. This single-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted at a public, tertiary academic medical center, which serves as a regional referral center for valvular heart interventions. Consecutive cases of patients undergoing TAVR from November 5, 2008, to December 31, 2019, were included in the study, with available baseline and post-TAVR data on kidney function. Steady state (1 month) change in kidney function after TAVR. Significant improvement or deterioration in renal function was defined as a greater than or equal to 10% change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Overall mortality at 2-year follow-up. A total of 894 patients (mean [SD] age, 82.2 [7.1] years; 452 women ([51.2%]) were evaluated. A total of 362 patients (40.5%) were treated from 2017 to 2019, 348 patients (38.9%) were treated from 2013 to 2016, and 184 patients (20.5%) were treated from 2008 and 2012. Patients had a mean (SD) Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score of 5.2% (4.0%) and a mean (SD) eGFR of 65.1 (23.1) mL/min/1.73 m2. Acute kidney injury occurred in 115 (11.1%) patients by 48 hours, of whom 73 (63.5%) resolved by discharge. One month after TAVR, eGFR improved by at least 10% in 329 patients (36.8%) and deteriorated by at least 10% in 233 patients (26.1%). Overall, CKD stage remained stable or improved in 720 patients (80.6%), and only 5 patients (0.97%) progressed to stage 5 CKD 1 month after TAVR. A deterioration of 10% or greater in eGFR 1 month after TAVR was associated with a hazard ratio of 2.16 (95% CI, 1.24-5.24; P = .04) at 2-year mortality. Patients who showed CKD status resolution (eGFR improvement to >60 mL/min/1.73 m2 after TAVR) had a similar 2-year mortality to those with baseline eGFR greater than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and vice versa. Factors associated with steady state CKD status resolution after TAVR included lower STS score, higher left ventricular ejection fraction, higher baseline eGFR, no acute kidney injury at discharge from the TAVR admission, and lower contrast-eGFR ratio. In this cohort study, kidney outcomes after TAVR were reassuring; greater than 80% of patients showed stable or improved kidney function 1 month after the procedure. Improvement in kidney function was associated with a lower 2-year mortality, whereas deterioration in kidney function was associated with increased mortality. Our data suggest that cardiorenal syndrome was a possible cause of CKD in patients in need of TAVR and that there was potential for improvement in both renal and cardiac function after this procedure.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33769507
pii: 2777870
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.3296
pmc: PMC7998079
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e213296Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2014 Feb;107(2):133-9
pubmed: 24556191
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Nov 4;52(19):1527-39
pubmed: 19007588
EuroIntervention. 2018 Aug 03;14(5):e503-e510
pubmed: 29688177
Eur Heart J. 2019 Jan 7;40(2):87-165
pubmed: 30165437
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016 Aug;27(8):2529-42
pubmed: 26712525
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Feb 27;10(4):355-363
pubmed: 28231903
Eur Heart J. 2019 Oct 7;40(38):3169-3178
pubmed: 31120108
Eur Heart J. 2014 Oct 7;35(38):2685-96
pubmed: 24796337
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jan 8;11(1):24-35
pubmed: 29055767
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Feb;8(2):e002220
pubmed: 25652319
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Feb 15;117(4):633-639
pubmed: 26721656
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Mar 14;69(10):1215-1230
pubmed: 27956264
JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Jul 1;2(7):742-749
pubmed: 28467527
CMAJ. 2005 Aug 30;173(5):489-95
pubmed: 16129869
Eur Heart J. 2012 Oct;33(19):2403-18
pubmed: 23026477
Eur Heart J. 2017 Sep 21;38(36):2739-2791
pubmed: 28886619
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Sep 22;76(12):1410-1421
pubmed: 32943158
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Jan 29;73(3):305-314
pubmed: 30678761
Can J Cardiol. 2019 Sep;35(9):1114-1123
pubmed: 31202537
Eur Heart J. 2014 Oct 1;35(37):2541-619
pubmed: 25173339