Complete chloroplast genomes of Impatiens cyanantha and Impatiens monticola: Insights into genome structures, mutational hotspots, comparative and phylogenetic analysis with its congeneric species.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
19
10
2020
accepted:
20
02
2021
entrez:
2
4
2021
pubmed:
3
4
2021
medline:
15
9
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Impatiens L., the largest genus in the family Balsaminaceae with approximately 1000 species, is a controversial and complex genus that includes many economically important species well known for medicinal and ornamental values. However, there is limited knowledge of molecular phylogeny and chloroplast genomics, and uncertainties still exist at a taxonomic level. In this study, we have assembled four chloroplast genomics specimens of Impatiens cyanantha and Impatiens monticola, which are found at the different altitudes of Guizhou and Yunnan in China, and compared them with previously published three wild Balsaminaceae species (Impatiens piufanensis, Impatiens glandlifera, and Hydrocera triflora). The complete chloroplast genome sequences ranged from 152,236 bp (I. piufanensis) to 154,189 bp (H. triflora) and encoded 115 total distinct genes, of which 81 were protein-coding, 30 were distinct transfer RNA genes(tRNA), and 4 were ribosomal RNA genes (rRNA). A comparative analysis of I. cyanantha (Guizhou) vs. I. cyanantha (Yunnan) and I. monticola (Guizhou) vs. I. monticola (Yunnan) revealed minor changes in lengths; however, similar gene contents, gene orders, and GC contents existed among them. Interestingly, highly coding and non-coding genes, and regions matK, psbK, atpH-atpI, trnC-trnT, petN, psbM, atpE, rbcL, accD, psaL, rps3-rps19, ndhG-ndhA,rpl16, rpoB, ndhB, ndhF, ycf1, and ndhH were found, which could be suitable for identification of species and phylogenetic studies. During the comparison between I. cyanantha (Guizhou) and I. cyanantha (Yunnan), we observed that the rps4, ycf2, ndhF, ycf1, and rpoC2 genes underwent positive selection. Meanwhile, in the comparative study of I. monticola (Guizhou) vs. I. monticola (Yunnan), The accD and ycf1 genes were positively selected. Additionally, phylogenetic relationships based on maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) among whole chloroplast genomes showed that a sister relationship with I. monticola (Guizhou) and I. monticola (Yunnan) formed a clade with I.piufanensis proving their close connection. Besides, I.cyanantha (Guizhou) and I. cyanantha (Yunnan) formed a clade with I. glandlifera. Along with the findings and the results, the current study might provide valuable significant genomic resources for systematics and evolution of the genus impatiens in different altitudes of regions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33798203
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248182
pii: PONE-D-20-32881
pmc: PMC8018631
doi:
Substances chimiques
Plant Proteins
0
RNA, Ribosomal
0
RNA, Transfer
9014-25-9
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0248182Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 Jul 3;45(W1):W6-W11
pubmed: 28486635
Mol Biol Evol. 2017 Dec 1;34(12):3299-3302
pubmed: 29029172
Nucleic Acids Res. 2005 Jul 1;33(Web Server issue):W686-9
pubmed: 15980563
Nucleic Acids Res. 2002 Jul 15;30(14):3059-66
pubmed: 12136088
Bioinformatics. 2017 Aug 15;33(16):2583-2585
pubmed: 28398459
Nucleic Acids Res. 1987 Feb 11;15(3):1281-95
pubmed: 3547335
PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e41608
pubmed: 22870236
3 Biotech. 2016 Dec;6(2):258
pubmed: 28330330
Genome Biol Evol. 2012;4(12):1316-23
pubmed: 23204304
Syst Biol. 2012 May;61(3):539-42
pubmed: 22357727
Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 2019 Oct 16;4(2):3624-3625
pubmed: 33366113
Ann Bot. 2009 Apr;103(6):885-99
pubmed: 19208670
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2009 Sep;52(3):806-24
pubmed: 19398024
Brief Bioinform. 2008 Jul;9(4):299-306
pubmed: 18417537
Bioinformatics. 2010 Aug 1;26(15):1899-900
pubmed: 20427515
Front Genet. 2020 Sep 25;11:576124
pubmed: 33101394
PhytoKeys. 2018 Nov 2;(110):51-67
pubmed: 30425602
Int J Phytoremediation. 2017 Aug 3;19(8):709-717
pubmed: 28398075
Mol Biol Evol. 2008 Jul;25(7):1253-6
pubmed: 18397919
J Nat Prod. 2017 Feb 24;80(2):471-478
pubmed: 28165740
Mol Biol Evol. 1997 Jul;14(7):685-95
pubmed: 9254330
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Jun 13;20(12):
pubmed: 31200508
Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2016 Jul;179(6):911-26
pubmed: 26971960
Syst Biol. 2012 Mar;61(2):228-39
pubmed: 22076302
Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 23;10(1):10137
pubmed: 32576920
PLoS One. 2019 May 9;14(5):e0216645
pubmed: 31071159
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 1;12(8):e0182281
pubmed: 28763486
J Plant Res. 2011 Mar;124(2):253-63
pubmed: 20711625
Int J Phytoremediation. 2016;18(3):228-34
pubmed: 26247535
Nat Methods. 2012 Mar 04;9(4):357-9
pubmed: 22388286
Plants (Basel). 2019 Apr 04;8(4):
pubmed: 30987338
Mol Biol Evol. 2015 Jan;32(1):268-74
pubmed: 25371430
Brief Bioinform. 2019 Jul 19;20(4):1160-1166
pubmed: 28968734
Fitoterapia. 2015 Sep;105:234-9
pubmed: 26183117
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2017;2017:4245830
pubmed: 28326124