Diversity of Italian red wines: A study by enological parameters, color, and phenolic indices.

Antioxidant capacity Autochthonous grape varieties D-Wines collaboration Multivariate analysis Phenolic compounds Red wine Tannins UV–Visible spectrophotometry

Journal

Food research international (Ottawa, Ont.)
ISSN: 1873-7145
Titre abrégé: Food Res Int
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 9210143

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 2021
Historique:
received: 26 07 2020
revised: 23 02 2021
accepted: 25 02 2021
entrez: 16 5 2021
pubmed: 17 5 2021
medline: 30 6 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

An extensive survey was conducted on 110 Italian monovarietal red wines from a single vintage to determine their standard compositional, color, and phenolic characteristics, analysing more than 35 parameters evaluated through methods commonly used in the wine industry. 'Primitivo' achieved the highest average alcohol strength (15.4% v/v) and dry extract values, while 'Cannonau' showed the lowest total acidity. 'Corvina' had the lowest phenolic content (1065 mg/L by Folin-Ciocalteu assay), remarkably different from the highest found in 'Sagrantino' (3578 mg/L), the latter being also the richest variety in both proanthocyanidins and vanillin-reactive flavanols. 'Teroldego' wines were the richest in both total and monomeric anthocyanins (702 and 315 mg/L, respectively), followed by 'Aglianico' and 'Raboso Piave', while 'Corvina', 'Nebbiolo', and 'Nerello Mascalese' were the poorest. 'Montepulciano' and 'Sangiovese' showed intermediate values for the majority of the parameters analyzed. A multivariate PCA-DA approach allowed achieving both a classification of the different wines as well as the discrimination of 'Sangiovese' wines produced in two regions (Emilia Romagna and Toscana) that returned a 42-66% success rate depending on the zone considered. Taking into account the number and diversity of the wines analyzed, a correlation study helped in better understanding the underlying relations between the most common and widespread analytical techniques for phenolic and color determinations.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33992377
pii: S0963-9969(21)00176-9
doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110277
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Anthocyanins 0
Phenols 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

110277

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Simone Giacosa (S)

Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences, University of Torino, 10095 Grugliasco, Italy.

Giuseppina Paola Parpinello (GP)

Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna, 47521 Cesena, Italy.

Susana Río Segade (S)

Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences, University of Torino, 10095 Grugliasco, Italy.

Arianna Ricci (A)

Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna, 47521 Cesena, Italy.

Maria Alessandra Paissoni (MA)

Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences, University of Torino, 10095 Grugliasco, Italy.

Andrea Curioni (A)

Department of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment (DAFNAE), University of Padova, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.

Matteo Marangon (M)

Department of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment (DAFNAE), University of Padova, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.

Fulvio Mattivi (F)

Department of Physics, Bioorganic Chemistry Laboratory, University of Trento, 38123 Povo, Italy; Department of Food Quality and Nutrition, Research and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, 38010 San Michele all'Adige, Italy.

Panagiotis Arapitsas (P)

Department of Food Quality and Nutrition, Research and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, 38010 San Michele all'Adige, Italy.

Luigi Moio (L)

Department of Agricultural Sciences, Division of Vine and Wine Sciences, University of Napoli Federico II, 83100 Avellino, Italy.

Paola Piombino (P)

Department of Agricultural Sciences, Division of Vine and Wine Sciences, University of Napoli Federico II, 83100 Avellino, Italy.

Maurizio Ugliano (M)

Department of Biotechnology, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy.

Davide Slaghenaufi (D)

Department of Biotechnology, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy.

Vincenzo Gerbi (V)

Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences, University of Torino, 10095 Grugliasco, Italy.

Luca Rolle (L)

Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences, University of Torino, 10095 Grugliasco, Italy. Electronic address: luca.rolle@unito.it.

Andrea Versari (A)

Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna, 47521 Cesena, Italy.

Articles similaires

Fragaria Light Plant Leaves Osmosis Stress, Physiological
Humans Cross-Sectional Studies Male Female Aged
Sorghum Antioxidants Phosphorus Fertilizers Flavonoids

Vision rehabilitation workforce in Italy: a country-level analysis.

Filippo Amore, Valeria Silvestri, Simona Turco et al.
1.00
Humans Italy Vision, Low Health Workforce Rehabilitation Centers

Classifications MeSH