Quality-in-use characteristics for clinical decision support system assessment.

CDSS Clinical decision support systems Quality assessment. Quality-in-use Software quality

Journal

Computer methods and programs in biomedicine
ISSN: 1872-7565
Titre abrégé: Comput Methods Programs Biomed
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 8506513

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2021
Historique:
received: 24 09 2020
accepted: 04 05 2021
pubmed: 2 6 2021
medline: 3 8 2021
entrez: 1 6 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) are developed to support healthcare practitioners with decision-making about therapy and diagnosis' confirmation, among others. Although there are many advantages of using CDSSs, there are still many challenges in their adoption. Therefore, it is essential to ensure the quality of the system, so that it can be used confidently and securely. This study aims to propose a set of (sub)characteristics which should be considered in evaluating the quality-in-use of CDSSs, based on the ISO/IEC 25010 standard and on existing literature. We reviewed the existing literature on CDSS assessment and presented a list of quality characteristics evaluated. Ten quality characteristics and 56 sub-characteristics were identified and selected from the literature, in which usability was evaluated the most. An example of a scenario has been presented to illustrate our assessment approach of satisfaction and efficiency as important quality-in-use characteristics to be applied in the evaluation of a CDSS. The proposed approach will contribute in bridging the gap between the quality of CDSSs and their adoption.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) are developed to support healthcare practitioners with decision-making about therapy and diagnosis' confirmation, among others. Although there are many advantages of using CDSSs, there are still many challenges in their adoption. Therefore, it is essential to ensure the quality of the system, so that it can be used confidently and securely.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
This study aims to propose a set of (sub)characteristics which should be considered in evaluating the quality-in-use of CDSSs, based on the ISO/IEC 25010 standard and on existing literature.
METHODS METHODS
We reviewed the existing literature on CDSS assessment and presented a list of quality characteristics evaluated.
RESULTS RESULTS
Ten quality characteristics and 56 sub-characteristics were identified and selected from the literature, in which usability was evaluated the most. An example of a scenario has been presented to illustrate our assessment approach of satisfaction and efficiency as important quality-in-use characteristics to be applied in the evaluation of a CDSS.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
The proposed approach will contribute in bridging the gap between the quality of CDSSs and their adoption.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34062492
pii: S0169-2607(21)00243-1
doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106169
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

106169

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest Authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Leonice Souza-Pereira (L)

Instituto Federal do Triângulo Mineiro - Campus Uberlândia Centro, Brasil; Instituto de Telecomunicações, Lisboa, Portugal; Universidade da Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal. Electronic address: leonice.pereira@ubi.pt.

Sofia Ouhbi (S)

Computer Science and Software Engineering Department, CIT, UAE University, UAE.

Nuno Pombo (N)

Instituto de Telecomunicações, Lisboa, Portugal; Universidade da Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal.

Articles similaires

Primary Health Care Electronic Health Records Humans Tanzania Surveys and Questionnaires

The crucial role of bioimage analysts in scientific research and publication.

Beth A Cimini, Peter Bankhead, Rocco D'Antuono et al.
1.00
Humans Biomedical Research Microscopy Publications
1.00
Humans Artificial Intelligence Health Personnel Decision Support Systems, Clinical Clinical Decision-Making

Unveiling scientific articles from paper mills with provenance analysis.

João Phillipe Cardenuto, Daniel Moreira, Anderson Rocha
1.00
Paper Scientific Misconduct Publications Humans Publishing

Classifications MeSH