Comparison of two targeted ultra-deep sequencing technologies for analysis of plasma circulating tumour DNA in endocrine-therapy-resistant breast cancer patients.
Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA)
Endocrine therapy resistance
Metastatic breast cancer
Next-generation sequencing
Journal
Breast cancer research and treatment
ISSN: 1573-7217
Titre abrégé: Breast Cancer Res Treat
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8111104
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2021
Jul 2021
Historique:
received:
17
11
2020
accepted:
30
03
2021
pubmed:
8
6
2021
medline:
9
7
2021
entrez:
7
6
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
There is growing interest in the application of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) as a sensitive tool for monitoring tumour evolution and guiding targeted therapy in patients with cancer. However, robust comparisons of different platform technologies are still required. Here we compared the InVisionSeq™ ctDNA Assay with the Oncomine™ Breast cfDNA Assay to assess their concordance and feasibility for the detection of mutations in plasma at low (< 0.5%) variant allele fraction (VAF). Ninety-six plasma samples from 50 patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive metastatic breast cancer (mBC) were profiled using the InVision Assay. Results were compared to the Oncomine assay in 30 samples from 26 patients, where there was sufficient material and variants were covered by both assays. Longitudinal samples were analysed for 8 patients with endocrine resistance. We detected alterations in 59/96 samples from 34/50 patients analysed with the InVision assay, most frequently affecting ESR1, PIK3CA and TP53. Complete or partial concordance was found in 28/30 samples analysed by both assays, and VAF values were highly correlated. Excellent concordance was found for most genes, and most discordant calls occurred at VAF < 1%. In longitudinal samples from progressing patients with endocrine resistance, we detected consistent alterations in sequential samples, most commonly in ESR1 and PIK3CA. This study shows that both ultra-deep next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies can detect genomic alternations even at low VAFs in plasma samples of mBC patients. The strong agreement of the technologies indicates sufficient reproducibility for clinical use as prognosic and predictive biomarker.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34097174
doi: 10.1007/s10549-021-06220-9
pii: 10.1007/s10549-021-06220-9
pmc: PMC8260509
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers, Tumor
0
Circulating Tumor DNA
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
465-476Subventions
Organisme : CRUK
ID : C14315/A23464
Références
PLoS Med. 2016 Dec 27;13(12):e1002201
pubmed: 28027327
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 18;8(10):e77963
pubmed: 24205045
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Mar 1;22(5):1130-7
pubmed: 26500237
Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Sep 15;24(18):4437-4443
pubmed: 29567812
Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Jul 15;25(14):4255-4263
pubmed: 30992300
Lung Cancer. 2019 Nov;137:1-6
pubmed: 31518912
Clin Chem. 2015 Jul;61(7):974-82
pubmed: 25979954
Clin Chem. 2019 Nov;65(11):1405-1413
pubmed: 31551314
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Jun 1;3(6):740-741
pubmed: 27541382
Chin Med J (Engl). 2017 5th Mar;130(5):522-529
pubmed: 28229982
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2019 May 22;4(4):748-752
pubmed: 31673668
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Jun 15;22(12):2960-8
pubmed: 26758560
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2020 Jan;145:102856
pubmed: 31884205
Breast Cancer Res. 2019 Dec 19;21(1):149
pubmed: 31856868
Cancer Cell. 2018 Sep 10;34(3):427-438.e6
pubmed: 30205045
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Oct 1;4(10):1428-1429
pubmed: 30027282
N Engl J Med. 2013 Mar 28;368(13):1199-209
pubmed: 23484797
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 16;13(3):e0194630
pubmed: 29547634
JCO Precis Oncol. 2019 Dec;3:1-9
pubmed: 35100678
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Oct 1;4(10):1431-1432
pubmed: 30027215
Ann Oncol. 2017 Apr 1;28(4):784-790
pubmed: 28104619
Mol Cancer Ther. 2017 Jul;16(7):1412-1420
pubmed: 28446639
Nature. 2019 May;569(7757):560-564
pubmed: 31118521
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Apr;180(2):331-341
pubmed: 32020432
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Oct 1;4(10):1429-1430
pubmed: 30027290
Annu Rev Med. 2011;62:217-32
pubmed: 21054173
Clin Chem. 2017 Feb;63(2):532-541
pubmed: 27940449
Cancer Treat Rev. 2019 Feb;73:73-83
pubmed: 30682661
Ann Oncol. 2018 Apr 1;29(4):1049-1055
pubmed: 29325035
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jun 1;36(16):1631-1641
pubmed: 29504847
Ann Oncol. 2018 Jan 1;29(1):145-153
pubmed: 29045530
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Sep 1;23(17):5101-5111
pubmed: 28539465
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Oct 1;4(10):1430
pubmed: 30027222
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Jul 1;3(7):996-998
pubmed: 27978570
Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 5;10(1):4124
pubmed: 32139724
BMC Cancer. 2016 Aug 11;16:622
pubmed: 27515171
Theranostics. 2017 Apr 2;7(6):1437-1446
pubmed: 28529628
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Oct 1;4(10):1430-1431
pubmed: 30027257
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Jan;155(1):139-49
pubmed: 26667234
Lab Invest. 2020 Nov;100(11):1475-1484
pubmed: 32616816
Lung Cancer. 2015 Dec;90(3):509-15
pubmed: 26494259
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 15;13(3):e0193802
pubmed: 29543828
Blood. 2015 Jul 2;126(1):9-16
pubmed: 25931582