Nutrients cause consolidation of soil carbon flux to small proportion of bacterial community.
Acidobacteria
/ genetics
Biodiversity
Bradyrhizobium
/ genetics
Carbon
/ metabolism
Carbon Cycle
Climate Change
DNA, Bacterial
/ isolation & purification
Ecological Parameter Monitoring
/ methods
Forecasting
/ methods
Nutrients
/ metabolism
Phosphorus
/ metabolism
RNA, Ribosomal, 16S
/ genetics
Soil
/ chemistry
Soil Microbiology
Streptomyces
/ genetics
Journal
Nature communications
ISSN: 2041-1723
Titre abrégé: Nat Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101528555
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 06 2021
07 06 2021
Historique:
received:
31
10
2020
accepted:
11
05
2021
entrez:
8
6
2021
pubmed:
9
6
2021
medline:
16
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Nutrient amendment diminished bacterial functional diversity, consolidating carbon flow through fewer bacterial taxa. Here, we show strong differences in the bacterial taxa responsible for respiration from four ecosystems, indicating the potential for taxon-specific control over soil carbon cycling. Trends in functional diversity, defined as the richness of bacteria contributing to carbon flux and their equitability of carbon use, paralleled trends in taxonomic diversity although functional diversity was lower overall. Among genera common to all ecosystems, Bradyrhizobium, the Acidobacteria genus RB41, and Streptomyces together composed 45-57% of carbon flow through bacterial productivity and respiration. Bacteria that utilized the most carbon amendment (glucose) were also those that utilized the most native soil carbon, suggesting that the behavior of key soil taxa may influence carbon balance. Mapping carbon flow through different microbial taxa as demonstrated here is crucial in developing taxon-sensitive soil carbon models that may reduce the uncertainty in climate change projections.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34099669
doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23676-x
pii: 10.1038/s41467-021-23676-x
pmc: PMC8184982
doi:
Substances chimiques
DNA, Bacterial
0
RNA, Ribosomal, 16S
0
Soil
0
Phosphorus
27YLU75U4W
Carbon
7440-44-0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3381Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Références
BMC Biol. 2014 Aug 22;12:69
pubmed: 25184604
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1984 Oct;48(4):755-7
pubmed: 6508285
Science. 2008 May 23;320(5879):1034-9
pubmed: 18497287
Science. 2018 Jan 19;359(6373):320-325
pubmed: 29348236
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015 Nov;81(21):7570-81
pubmed: 26296731
ISME J. 2017 Aug;11(8):1890-1899
pubmed: 28387774
Microb Ecol. 2011 May;61(4):911-6
pubmed: 21365231
Nature. 2009 May 14;459(7244):193-9
pubmed: 19444205
Nat Methods. 2010 May;7(5):335-6
pubmed: 20383131
Nat Ecol Evol. 2019 Jul;3(7):1064-1069
pubmed: 31209289
Nat Biotechnol. 2019 Aug;37(8):852-857
pubmed: 31341288
ISME J. 2019 Sep;13(9):2162-2172
pubmed: 31053828
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2012 Jun;80(3):735-46
pubmed: 22379979
Ecol Appl. 2013 Jan;23(1):255-72
pubmed: 23495650
Nat Methods. 2016 Jul;13(7):581-3
pubmed: 27214047
Front Microbiol. 2016 Feb 24;7:214
pubmed: 26941732
Front Microbiol. 2016 May 31;7:744
pubmed: 27303369
Nat Commun. 2021 Jun 7;12(1):3381
pubmed: 34099669
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2011 Feb;9(2):119-30
pubmed: 21233850
Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Jan;41(Database issue):D590-6
pubmed: 23193283
J Exp Biol. 2005 May;208(Pt 9):1575-92
pubmed: 15855389
Front Microbiol. 2012 Dec 19;3:417
pubmed: 23267351
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 May 24;113(21):5970-5
pubmed: 27140646
Front Microbiol. 2015 Jun 16;6:615
pubmed: 26136742
Stand Genomic Sci. 2010 Dec 25;3(3):243-8
pubmed: 21304727