Free energy landscape of RNA binding dynamics in start codon recognition by eukaryotic ribosomal pre-initiation complex.
Anticodon
/ chemistry
Base Pairing
Base Sequence
Codon, Initiator
/ chemistry
Computational Biology
Eukaryotic Cells
/ metabolism
Models, Biological
Molecular Dynamics Simulation
Nucleic Acid Conformation
Peptide Chain Initiation, Translational
RNA, Messenger
/ chemistry
Ribosomes
/ metabolism
Thermodynamics
Journal
PLoS computational biology
ISSN: 1553-7358
Titre abrégé: PLoS Comput Biol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101238922
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2021
06 2021
Historique:
received:
13
03
2021
accepted:
12
05
2021
revised:
24
06
2021
pubmed:
15
6
2021
medline:
21
10
2021
entrez:
14
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Specific interaction between the start codon, 5'-AUG-3', and the anticodon, 5'-CAU-3', ensures accurate initiation of translation. Recent studies show that several near-cognate start codons (e.g. GUG and CUG) can play a role in initiating translation in eukaryotes. However, the mechanism allowing initiation through mismatched base-pairs at the ribosomal decoding site is still unclear at an atomic level. In this work, we propose an extended simulation-based method to evaluate free energy profiles, through computing the distance between each base-pair of the triplet interactions involved in recognition of start codons in eukaryotic translation pre-initiation complex. Our method provides not only the free energy penalty for mismatched start codons relative to the AUG start codon, but also the preferred pathways of transitions between bound and unbound states, which has not been described by previous studies. To verify the method, the binding dynamics of cognate (AUG) and near-cognate start codons (CUG and GUG) were simulated. Evaluated free energy profiles agree with experimentally observed changes in initiation frequencies from respective codons. This work proposes for the first time how a G:U mismatch at the first position of codon (GUG)-anticodon base-pairs destabilizes the accommodation in the initiating eukaryotic ribosome and how initiation at a CUG codon is nearly as strong as, or sometimes stronger than, that at a GUG codon. Our method is expected to be applied to study the affinity changes for various mismatched base-pairs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34125830
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009068
pii: PCOMPBIOL-D-21-00485
pmc: PMC8224888
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anticodon
0
Codon, Initiator
0
RNA, Messenger
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e1009068Subventions
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : P20 GM103418
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R01 GM064781
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R15 GM124671
Pays : United States
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
J Biol Chem. 2013 Sep 20;288(38):27546-27562
pubmed: 23893413
Cell. 2014 Oct 23;159(3):597-607
pubmed: 25417110
Cell. 2011 Nov 11;147(4):789-802
pubmed: 22056041
J Comput Chem. 2005 Dec;26(16):1781-802
pubmed: 16222654
Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Sep 30;44(17):8425-32
pubmed: 27280974
EMBO J. 2006 Oct 4;25(19):4537-46
pubmed: 16990799
Nat Struct Biol. 2002 Sep;9(9):646-52
pubmed: 12198485
Cell Rep. 2017 Mar 14;18(11):2651-2663
pubmed: 28297669
Cell. 2013 May 23;153(5):1108-19
pubmed: 23706745
Mol Cell Biol. 2012 Oct;32(19):3978-89
pubmed: 22851688
J Chem Theory Comput. 2012 Jan 10;8(1):348-362
pubmed: 22368531
Biochemistry. 2013 Dec 31;52(52):9510-8
pubmed: 24319994
J Mol Graph. 1996 Feb;14(1):33-8, 27-8
pubmed: 8744570
Mol Cell. 2007 Apr 13;26(1):41-50
pubmed: 17434125
J Phys Chem B. 2015 Jan 22;119(3):1129-51
pubmed: 25247823
Elife. 2018 Nov 30;7:
pubmed: 30475211
PLoS Comput Biol. 2008 Aug 08;4(8):e1000124
pubmed: 18688270
Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2002 Apr;12(2):190-6
pubmed: 11959496
Mol Cell. 2015 Aug 6;59(3):399-412
pubmed: 26212456
Mol Cell. 2005 Oct 28;20(2):251-62
pubmed: 16246727
J Mol Biol. 1999 Jan 8;285(1):245-57
pubmed: 9878403
Cell. 2009 Feb 20;136(4):731-45
pubmed: 19239892
J Biol Chem. 2013 Mar 29;288(13):9549-62
pubmed: 23396971
Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 Nov 16;45(20):11941-11953
pubmed: 28981728
Translation (Austin). 2014 Mar 12;2(1):e28387
pubmed: 26779403
Brief Bioinform. 2014 Sep;15(5):748-67
pubmed: 23803300
J Chem Theory Comput. 2015 Feb 10;11(2):766-79
pubmed: 25691833
Cell Rep. 2012 Jun 28;1(6):689-702
pubmed: 22813744
Genes Dev. 2010 Jan 1;24(1):97-110
pubmed: 20048003
Genes Dev. 2000 Oct 1;14(19):2534-46
pubmed: 11018020
J Chem Theory Comput. 2012 Sep 11;8(9):3257-3273
pubmed: 23341755
J Chem Phys. 2008 Apr 14;128(14):144120
pubmed: 18412436
J Chem Theory Comput. 2010 Jan 12;6(1):35-47
pubmed: 26614317
RNA. 2009 Jan;15(1):138-52
pubmed: 19029312