High-grade serous tubo-ovarian cancer refined with single-cell RNA sequencing: specific cell subtypes influence survival and determine molecular subtype classification.


Journal

Genome medicine
ISSN: 1756-994X
Titre abrégé: Genome Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101475844

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 07 2021
Historique:
received: 06 05 2020
accepted: 08 06 2021
entrez: 9 7 2021
pubmed: 10 7 2021
medline: 17 2 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

High-grade serous tubo-ovarian cancer (HGSTOC) is characterised by extensive inter- and intratumour heterogeneity, resulting in persistent therapeutic resistance and poor disease outcome. Molecular subtype classification based on bulk RNA sequencing facilitates a more accurate characterisation of this heterogeneity, but the lack of strong prognostic or predictive correlations with these subtypes currently hinders their clinical implementation. Stromal admixture profoundly affects the prognostic impact of the molecular subtypes, but the contribution of stromal cells to each subtype has poorly been characterised. Increasing the transcriptomic resolution of the molecular subtypes based on single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) may provide insights in the prognostic and predictive relevance of these subtypes. We performed scRNA-seq of 18,403 cells unbiasedly collected from 7 treatment-naive HGSTOC tumours. For each phenotypic cluster of tumour or stromal cells, we identified specific transcriptomic markers. We explored which phenotypic clusters correlated with overall survival based on expression of these transcriptomic markers in microarray data of 1467 tumours. By evaluating molecular subtype signatures in single cells, we assessed to what extent a phenotypic cluster of tumour or stromal cells contributes to each molecular subtype. We identified 11 cancer and 32 stromal cell phenotypes in HGSTOC tumours. Of these, the relative frequency of myofibroblasts, TGF-β-driven cancer-associated fibroblasts, mesothelial cells and lymphatic endothelial cells predicted poor outcome, while plasma cells correlated with more favourable outcome. Moreover, we identified a clear cell-like transcriptomic signature in cancer cells, which correlated with worse overall survival in HGSTOC patients. Stromal cell phenotypes differed substantially between molecular subtypes. For instance, the mesenchymal, immunoreactive and differentiated signatures were characterised by specific fibroblast, immune cell and myofibroblast/mesothelial cell phenotypes, respectively. Cell phenotypes correlating with poor outcome were enriched in molecular subtypes associated with poor outcome. We used scRNA-seq to identify stromal cell phenotypes predicting overall survival in HGSTOC patients. These stromal features explain the association of the molecular subtypes with outcome but also the latter's weakness of clinical implementation. Stratifying patients based on marker genes specific for these phenotypes represents a promising approach to predict prognosis or response to therapy.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
High-grade serous tubo-ovarian cancer (HGSTOC) is characterised by extensive inter- and intratumour heterogeneity, resulting in persistent therapeutic resistance and poor disease outcome. Molecular subtype classification based on bulk RNA sequencing facilitates a more accurate characterisation of this heterogeneity, but the lack of strong prognostic or predictive correlations with these subtypes currently hinders their clinical implementation. Stromal admixture profoundly affects the prognostic impact of the molecular subtypes, but the contribution of stromal cells to each subtype has poorly been characterised. Increasing the transcriptomic resolution of the molecular subtypes based on single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) may provide insights in the prognostic and predictive relevance of these subtypes.
METHODS
We performed scRNA-seq of 18,403 cells unbiasedly collected from 7 treatment-naive HGSTOC tumours. For each phenotypic cluster of tumour or stromal cells, we identified specific transcriptomic markers. We explored which phenotypic clusters correlated with overall survival based on expression of these transcriptomic markers in microarray data of 1467 tumours. By evaluating molecular subtype signatures in single cells, we assessed to what extent a phenotypic cluster of tumour or stromal cells contributes to each molecular subtype.
RESULTS
We identified 11 cancer and 32 stromal cell phenotypes in HGSTOC tumours. Of these, the relative frequency of myofibroblasts, TGF-β-driven cancer-associated fibroblasts, mesothelial cells and lymphatic endothelial cells predicted poor outcome, while plasma cells correlated with more favourable outcome. Moreover, we identified a clear cell-like transcriptomic signature in cancer cells, which correlated with worse overall survival in HGSTOC patients. Stromal cell phenotypes differed substantially between molecular subtypes. For instance, the mesenchymal, immunoreactive and differentiated signatures were characterised by specific fibroblast, immune cell and myofibroblast/mesothelial cell phenotypes, respectively. Cell phenotypes correlating with poor outcome were enriched in molecular subtypes associated with poor outcome.
CONCLUSIONS
We used scRNA-seq to identify stromal cell phenotypes predicting overall survival in HGSTOC patients. These stromal features explain the association of the molecular subtypes with outcome but also the latter's weakness of clinical implementation. Stratifying patients based on marker genes specific for these phenotypes represents a promising approach to predict prognosis or response to therapy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34238352
doi: 10.1186/s13073-021-00922-x
pii: 10.1186/s13073-021-00922-x
pmc: PMC8268616
doi:

Substances chimiques

Biomarkers, Tumor 0
Cytokines 0
Immunoglobulin G 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

111

Références

Eur J Cancer. 2013 Jan;49(2):520-30
pubmed: 22897840
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 May 1;23(9):2223-2231
pubmed: 27852697
F1000Res. 2015 Oct 14;4:1070
pubmed: 26674615
Nat Commun. 2018 Nov 9;9(1):4719
pubmed: 30413715
Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Feb;152(2):368-374
pubmed: 30448260
J Cell Biol. 2010 May 3;189(3):417-24
pubmed: 20439995
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2017 Aug 1;313(2):F310-F318
pubmed: 28490530
Oncotarget. 2016 Jan 12;7(2):1486-99
pubmed: 26625204
Cell. 2011 Mar 4;144(5):646-74
pubmed: 21376230
G3 (Bethesda). 2016 Dec 7;6(12):4097-4103
pubmed: 27729437
Int J Cancer. 2015 Mar 1;136(5):E359-86
pubmed: 25220842
Cancer Res. 2008 Jul 1;68(13):5478-86
pubmed: 18593951
Cancer Res. 2020 Oct 15;80(20):4335-4345
pubmed: 32747365
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Sep 28;107(39):16910-5
pubmed: 20837533
Int J Cancer. 2008 Nov 15;123(10):2229-38
pubmed: 18777559
J Cell Sci. 2008 Mar 15;121(Pt 6):895-905
pubmed: 18303050
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002 Jun 5;94(11):819-25
pubmed: 12048269
Nature. 2013 Sep 19;501(7467):338-45
pubmed: 24048066
Cancer Res. 2007 Feb 15;67(4):1757-68
pubmed: 17308118
Nature. 2011 Jun 29;474(7353):609-15
pubmed: 21720365
Mol Nutr Food Res. 2014 May;58(5):1132-43
pubmed: 24347371
Nature. 2015 May 28;521(7553):489-94
pubmed: 26017449
PLoS Med. 2015 Feb 24;12(2):e1001789
pubmed: 25710373
Oncogene. 2010 Sep 9;29(36):5006-18
pubmed: 20603617
J Exp Med. 2017 Mar 6;214(3):579-596
pubmed: 28232471
Bioinformatics. 2011 Jun 15;27(12):1739-40
pubmed: 21546393
Clin Cancer Res. 2014 Jul 15;20(14):3818-29
pubmed: 24916698
Nat Biotechnol. 2018 May 9;36(5):408-409
pubmed: 29734314
Science. 2017 Apr 21;356(6335):
pubmed: 28428369
Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Feb;124(2):192-8
pubmed: 22040834
Neoplasia. 2011 May;13(5):393-405
pubmed: 21532880
Nat Rev Cancer. 2015 Nov;15(11):668-79
pubmed: 26493647
Cells. 2018 Jun 21;7(7):
pubmed: 29933600
Genome Res. 2015 Oct;25(10):1491-8
pubmed: 26430159
Cell Tissue Res. 2003 Oct;314(1):167-77
pubmed: 12883995
Cell Rep. 2019 Dec 10;29(11):3726-3735.e4
pubmed: 31825847
Cancers (Basel). 2018 Oct 29;10(11):
pubmed: 30380628
Cell Rep. 2021 Apr 13;35(2):108978
pubmed: 33852846
Nat Commun. 2016 Oct 10;7:13041
pubmed: 27721378
J Ovarian Res. 2019 May 10;12(1):42
pubmed: 31077234
Eur J Immunol. 2000 Aug;30(8):2437-43
pubmed: 10940936
Cell. 2016 Jul 28;166(3):755-765
pubmed: 27372738
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Jan 1;23(1):250-262
pubmed: 27354470
Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Oct 15;24(20):5037-5047
pubmed: 30084834
J Pathol. 2017 Jun;242(2):140-151
pubmed: 28247413
Clin Cancer Res. 2012 May 1;18(9):2695-703
pubmed: 22351685
Genome Res. 2014 Dec;24(12):2022-32
pubmed: 25236618
PLoS One. 2011 Apr 13;6(4):e18064
pubmed: 21533284
Nat Methods. 2017 Nov;14(11):1083-1086
pubmed: 28991892
J Ovarian Res. 2016 Apr 06;9:21
pubmed: 27048364
PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e30269
pubmed: 22348002
Br J Cancer. 2010 Feb 16;102(4):639-44
pubmed: 20087353
Cell Res. 2020 Sep;30(9):745-762
pubmed: 32561858
Nat Genet. 2013 Oct;45(10):1127-33
pubmed: 24071851
Science. 2014 Jun 20;344(6190):1396-401
pubmed: 24925914
Mol Med Today. 2000 Apr;6(4):157-62
pubmed: 10740254
Nature. 2016 Jun 08;534(7607):391-5
pubmed: 27281220
Nat Med. 2020 Aug;26(8):1271-1279
pubmed: 32572264
N Engl J Med. 2011 Dec 29;365(26):2473-83
pubmed: 22204724
Oncogene. 2016 Feb 11;35(6):748-60
pubmed: 25961925
J Mol Endocrinol. 2013 Dec 19;52(1):R17-33
pubmed: 24049064
Nat Biotechnol. 2018 Jun;36(5):411-420
pubmed: 29608179
Eur J Cancer. 2016 Jan;53:51-64
pubmed: 26693899
Ann Oncol. 2001 Sep;12(9):1195-203
pubmed: 11697824
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Jun 15;22(12):3005-15
pubmed: 26763251
Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2014 Mar;63(3):215-24
pubmed: 24297569
Nat Commun. 2017 May 05;8:15081
pubmed: 28474673
Genome Med. 2021 Jul 9;13(1):111
pubmed: 34238352
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020 Feb;29(2):509-519
pubmed: 31871106
Oncogene. 2014 Jun 26;33(26):3432-40
pubmed: 23934190
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Oct 25;102(43):15545-50
pubmed: 16199517
Genes (Basel). 2020 Nov 04;11(11):
pubmed: 33158173
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Jul 15;23(14):3794-3801
pubmed: 28159814
Cell Rep. 2021 May 25;35(8):109165
pubmed: 34038734
Cancer Res. 2010 Dec 1;70(23):9682-92
pubmed: 20952505
Cell. 2018 Apr 5;173(2):400-416.e11
pubmed: 29625055
J Mol Med (Berl). 2018 Feb;96(2):173-182
pubmed: 29230527
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Jul 05;21(13):
pubmed: 32635651
Cancer Res. 2005 Dec 1;65(23):10794-800
pubmed: 16322225
Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 14;9(1):4536
pubmed: 30872643
Nat Methods. 2017 Sep 29;14(10):935-936
pubmed: 28960196
Nat Biotechnol. 2020 Jun;38(6):737-746
pubmed: 32341560
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Sep;83:88-98
pubmed: 28734146
Nature. 2013 Sep 19;501(7467):355-64
pubmed: 24048068
Immunity. 2002 Jul;17(1):51-62
pubmed: 12150891
J Pathol. 2013 Sep;231(1):21-34
pubmed: 23780408
Nat Commun. 2018 Sep 4;9(1):3588
pubmed: 30181541
Eur J Cancer. 2013 Apr;49(6):1374-403
pubmed: 23485231
Nature. 2018 Dec;564(7735):268-272
pubmed: 30479382
PLoS One. 2010 Jun 18;5(6):e11198
pubmed: 20585448
J Leukoc Biol. 2006 Sep;80(3):546-54
pubmed: 16822853
Database (Oxford). 2013 Apr 02;2013:bat013
pubmed: 23550061
Nat Med. 2018 Aug;24(8):1277-1289
pubmed: 29988129
PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e30550
pubmed: 22348014
Cancer Res. 2010 Dec 15;70(24):10371-80
pubmed: 21056993
Science. 2016 Apr 8;352(6282):189-96
pubmed: 27124452
J Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Apr;26(2):87-9
pubmed: 25872889
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Nov;86:5-14
pubmed: 28950147
Reprod Sci. 2014 Oct;21(10):1249-55
pubmed: 24520083
Gynecol Oncol. 2010 May;117(2):189-97
pubmed: 20189233
Genome Med. 2020 Sep 29;12(1):80
pubmed: 32988401
Cell. 2019 Jul 25;178(3):686-698.e14
pubmed: 31257031
Cancer Res. 2005 May 1;65(9):3772-80
pubmed: 15867373
Br J Cancer. 2012 Jun 5;106(12):2010-5
pubmed: 22596238
Exp Ther Med. 2016 May;11(5):1587-1594
pubmed: 27168777
Genome Biol. 2017 Nov 15;18(1):220
pubmed: 29141660
Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2004 Apr;23(2):110-8
pubmed: 15084838
Clin Cancer Res. 2008 Aug 15;14(16):5198-208
pubmed: 18698038
Nat Protoc. 2020 Apr;15(4):1484-1506
pubmed: 32103204
Gynecol Oncol. 1996 Mar;60(3):412-7
pubmed: 8774649
Nat Immunol. 2000 Dec;1(6):526-32
pubmed: 11101876
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Sep 30;106(10):
pubmed: 25269487
Clin Cancer Res. 2008 Dec 1;14(23):7682-90
pubmed: 19047094
J Clin Invest. 2013 Jan;123(1):517-25
pubmed: 23257362
EBioMedicine. 2020 Jan;51:102602
pubmed: 31911269
Gynecol Oncol. 2010 Mar;116(3):556-62
pubmed: 20006900
Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Jun 15;18(12):3281-92
pubmed: 22553348

Auteurs

Siel Olbrecht (S)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Gynaecological Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. siel.olbrecht@uzleuven.be.
Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Gynaecologic Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. siel.olbrecht@uzleuven.be.
VIB Centre for Cancer Biology, Leuven, Belgium. siel.olbrecht@uzleuven.be.

Pieter Busschaert (P)

Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Gynaecologic Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Junbin Qian (J)

VIB Centre for Cancer Biology, Leuven, Belgium.
Laboratory for Translational Genetics, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Adriaan Vanderstichele (A)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Gynaecological Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Gynaecologic Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Liselore Loverix (L)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Gynaecological Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Gynaecologic Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
VIB Centre for Cancer Biology, Leuven, Belgium.

Toon Van Gorp (T)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Gynaecological Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Gynaecologic Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Els Van Nieuwenhuysen (E)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Gynaecological Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Gynaecologic Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Sileny Han (S)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Gynaecological Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Gynaecologic Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Annick Van den Broeck (A)

Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Gynaecologic Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

An Coosemans (A)

Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumour Immunology and Immunotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Anne-Sophie Van Rompuy (AS)

Department of Imaging and Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Department of Translational Cell and Tissue Research, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Diether Lambrechts (D)

VIB Centre for Cancer Biology, Leuven, Belgium. diether.lambrechts@kuleuven.be.
Laboratory for Translational Genetics, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. diether.lambrechts@kuleuven.be.

Ignace Vergote (I)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Gynaecological Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Gynaecologic Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Articles similaires

Genome, Chloroplast Phylogeny Genetic Markers Base Composition High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C

Classifications MeSH