Validation of a Circulating Tumor DNA-Based Next-Generation Sequencing Assay in a Cohort of Patients with Solid tumors: A Proposed Solution for Decentralized Plasma Testing.
Cancer immunotherapy
Circulating tumor DNA
Microsatellite instability status
Journal
The oncologist
ISSN: 1549-490X
Titre abrégé: Oncologist
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9607837
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2021
11 2021
Historique:
received:
08
03
2021
accepted:
09
07
2021
pubmed:
22
7
2021
medline:
22
12
2021
entrez:
21
7
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Characterization of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has been integrated into clinical practice. Although labs have standardized validation procedures to develop single locus tests, the efficacy of on-site plasma-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) assays still needs to be proved. In this retrospective study, we profiled DNA from matched tissue and plasma samples from 75 patients with cancer. We applied an NGS test that detects clinically relevant alterations in 33 genes and microsatellite instability (MSI) to analyze plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA). The concordance between alterations detected in both tissue and plasma samples was higher in patients with metastatic disease. The NGS test detected 77% of sequence alterations, amplifications, and fusions that were found in metastatic samples compared with 45% of those alterations found in the primary tumor samples (p = .00005). There was 87% agreement on MSI status between the NGS test and tumor tissue results. In three patients, MSI-high ctDNA correlated with response to immunotherapy. In addition, the NGS test revealed an FGFR2 amplification that was not detected in tumor tissue from a patient with metastatic gastric cancer, emphasizing the importance of profiling plasma samples in patients with advanced cancer. Our validation experience of a plasma-based NGS assay advances current knowledge about translating cfDNA testing into clinical practice and supports the application of plasma assays in the management of oncology patients with metastatic disease. With an in-house method that minimizes the need for invasive procedures, on-site cfDNA testing supplements tissue biopsy to guide precision therapy and is entitled to become a routine practice. This study proposes a solution for decentralized liquid biopsy testing based on validation of a next-generation sequencing (NGS) test that detects four classes of genomic alterations in blood: sequence mutations (single nucleotide substitutions or insertions and deletions), fusions, amplifications, and microsatellite instability (MSI). Although there are reference labs that perform single-site comprehensive liquid biopsy testing, the targeted assay this study validated can be established locally in any lab with capacity to offer clinical molecular pathology assays. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first report that validates evaluating an on-site plasma-based NGS test that detects the MSI status along with common sequence alterations encountered in solid tumors.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Characterization of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has been integrated into clinical practice. Although labs have standardized validation procedures to develop single locus tests, the efficacy of on-site plasma-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) assays still needs to be proved.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
In this retrospective study, we profiled DNA from matched tissue and plasma samples from 75 patients with cancer. We applied an NGS test that detects clinically relevant alterations in 33 genes and microsatellite instability (MSI) to analyze plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA).
RESULTS
The concordance between alterations detected in both tissue and plasma samples was higher in patients with metastatic disease. The NGS test detected 77% of sequence alterations, amplifications, and fusions that were found in metastatic samples compared with 45% of those alterations found in the primary tumor samples (p = .00005). There was 87% agreement on MSI status between the NGS test and tumor tissue results. In three patients, MSI-high ctDNA correlated with response to immunotherapy. In addition, the NGS test revealed an FGFR2 amplification that was not detected in tumor tissue from a patient with metastatic gastric cancer, emphasizing the importance of profiling plasma samples in patients with advanced cancer.
CONCLUSION
Our validation experience of a plasma-based NGS assay advances current knowledge about translating cfDNA testing into clinical practice and supports the application of plasma assays in the management of oncology patients with metastatic disease. With an in-house method that minimizes the need for invasive procedures, on-site cfDNA testing supplements tissue biopsy to guide precision therapy and is entitled to become a routine practice.
IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE
This study proposes a solution for decentralized liquid biopsy testing based on validation of a next-generation sequencing (NGS) test that detects four classes of genomic alterations in blood: sequence mutations (single nucleotide substitutions or insertions and deletions), fusions, amplifications, and microsatellite instability (MSI). Although there are reference labs that perform single-site comprehensive liquid biopsy testing, the targeted assay this study validated can be established locally in any lab with capacity to offer clinical molecular pathology assays. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first report that validates evaluating an on-site plasma-based NGS test that detects the MSI status along with common sequence alterations encountered in solid tumors.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34286887
doi: 10.1002/onco.13905
pmc: PMC8571755
doi:
Substances chimiques
Circulating Tumor DNA
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Validation Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e1971-e1981Informations de copyright
© 2021 AlphaMed Press.
Références
Mol Oncol. 2020 Mar;14(3):487-489
pubmed: 32017376
Hum Genomics. 2019 Aug 1;13(1):34
pubmed: 31370908
Ann Transl Med. 2017 Feb;5(3):46
pubmed: 28251125
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2021 Feb;35(2):387-395
pubmed: 32569440
Onco Targets Ther. 2015 Apr 24;8:959-67
pubmed: 25960669
Mol Cancer Ther. 2019 May;18(5):1001-1011
pubmed: 30926636
Sci Transl Med. 2010 Feb 24;2(20):20ra14
pubmed: 20371490
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Jun 15;22(12):2960-8
pubmed: 26758560
Bioinformatics. 2009 Jul 15;25(14):1754-60
pubmed: 19451168
Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Dec 1;25(23):7035-7045
pubmed: 31383735
Sci Transl Med. 2018 Sep 5;10(457):
pubmed: 30185652
Cancers (Basel). 2019 Dec 04;11(12):
pubmed: 31817150
Ann Oncol. 2019 Jul 1;30(7):1088-1095
pubmed: 31046124
Ann Oncol. 2018 May 1;29(5):1211-1219
pubmed: 29438522
J Mol Diagn. 2017 May;19(3):341-365
pubmed: 28341590
Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Dec 1;25(23):7024-7034
pubmed: 31506389
Future Oncol. 2011 Dec;7(12):1385-97
pubmed: 22112315
Ann Oncol. 2019 Sep 1;30(9):1448-1459
pubmed: 31228184
Clin Transl Oncol. 2018 Oct;20(10):1261-1267
pubmed: 29623586
Ann Oncol. 2019 Mar 1;30(3):374-384
pubmed: 30753271
Ann Oncol. 2017 Oct 1;28(10):2458-2463
pubmed: 28945843
Sci Transl Med. 2017 Aug 16;9(403):
pubmed: 28814544
Clin Lung Cancer. 2018 Mar;19(2):181-190
pubmed: 29174086
Ann Oncol. 2019 Feb 1;30(2):290-296
pubmed: 30535340
Ann Lab Med. 2018 Jan;38(1):1-8
pubmed: 29071812
Transl Oncol. 2018 Oct;11(5):1220-1224
pubmed: 30086420
Bioinformatics. 2014 Apr 1;30(7):1015-6
pubmed: 24371154
Nat Commun. 2014 Nov 21;5:5383
pubmed: 25415230
Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2020 Jun 3;8(1):80
pubmed: 32493417
J Mol Diagn. 2018 Sep;20(5):686-702
pubmed: 29936259