Longitudinal Outcomes Associated With Non-Evidence-Based Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators Among Medicare Beneficiaries (From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry).
Aged
Death, Sudden, Cardiac
/ prevention & control
Defibrillators, Implantable
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Heart Failure
/ economics
Hospitalization
Humans
Insurance Benefits
/ economics
Male
Primary Prevention
/ methods
Registries
Retrospective Studies
Survival Rate
/ trends
Time Factors
United States
/ epidemiology
Journal
The American journal of cardiology
ISSN: 1879-1913
Titre abrégé: Am J Cardiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0207277
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 09 2021
15 09 2021
Historique:
received:
07
04
2021
revised:
04
06
2021
accepted:
14
06
2021
pubmed:
29
7
2021
medline:
22
9
2021
entrez:
28
7
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) in patients with recent myocardial infarction or coronary revascularization and those with newly diagnosed or severe heart failure (HF) are considered non-evidence-based, as defined by pivotal randomized clinical trials. Although non-evidence-based ICDs have been associated previously with greater risk of in-hospital adverse events, longitudinal outcomes are not known. We used Medicare-linked data from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry's ICD Registry to identify patients discharged alive following first-time primary prevention ICD implantations performed between 2010 and 2013. We compared longitudinal outcomes, including all-cause mortality and all-cause hospital readmission among patients receiving non-evidence-based versus evidence-based ICDs, up to 4.75 years after implantation, using multivariable time-to-event analyses. Of 71,666 ICD implantations, 9,609 (13.4%) were classified as non-evidence-based. Compared to patients receiving evidence-based ICDs, non-evidence-based ICD recipients had greater mortality risk at 90 days (HR = 1.44, CI: 1.37 - 1.52, p <0.0001) and at 1 year (HR = 1.19, CI: 1.15 - 1.24, p <0.0001), but similar mortality risk at 3 years (HR = 1.03, CI: 0.98 - 1.08, p = 0.2630). Risk of all-cause hospitalization was higher in patients with non-evidence-based ICDs at 90 days (HR = 1.17, CI: 1.14 - 1.20, p <0.0001), but the difference diminished at 1 year (HR = 1.04, CI 1.00 - 1.07, p = 0.0272) and at 3 years (HR = 0.94, CI: 0.90 - 0.99, p = 0.0105). In conclusion, among patients undergoing primary prevention ICD implantations between 2010 and 2013, those with non-evidence-based ICDs were at increased risk of mortality and readmission during longitudinal follow-up. Differences in the risk of mortality and hospitalization were highest in the first year following device implantation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34315569
pii: S0002-9149(21)00578-6
doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.06.020
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
64-71Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.