Teaching plain language to medical students: improving communication with disadvantaged patients.
Doctor patient communication
Experience-based learning
Health literacy
Plain language
Undergraduate medical education
Written communication
Journal
BMC medical education
ISSN: 1472-6920
Titre abrégé: BMC Med Educ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088679
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Jul 2021
28 Jul 2021
Historique:
received:
05
01
2021
accepted:
16
07
2021
entrez:
29
7
2021
pubmed:
30
7
2021
medline:
31
7
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Low health literacy underpins health inequality and leads to poor adherence to medical care and higher risk of adverse events and rehospitalization. Communication in plain language, therefore, is an essential skill for health professionals to acquire. Most medical education communication skill programs focus on verbal communication, while written communication training is scarce. ETGAR is a student delivered service for vulnerable patients after hospital discharge in which, amongst other duties, students 'translate' the medical discharge letters into plain language and share them with patients at a home visit. This study ascertains how this plain language training impacted on students' written communication skills using a tool designed for purpose. Students, in pairs, wrote three plain language discharge letters over the course of a year for patients whom they encountered in hospital. The students handed over and shared the letters with the patients during a post-discharge home visit. Structured feedback from course instructors was given for each letter. An assessment tool was developed to evaluate students' ability to tell the hospitalization narrative using plain and clear language. First and last letters were blindly evaluated for the entire cohort (74 letters; 87 students). Students scored higher in all assessment categories in the third letters, with significant improvement in overall score 3.5 ± 0.8 vs 4.1 ± 0.6 Z = -3.43, p = 0.001. The assessment tool's reliability was high α = 0.797, it successfully differentiated between plain language categories, and its score was not affected by letter length or patient's medical condition. Plain language discharge letters written for real patients in the context of experience-based learning improved in quality, providing students with skills to work effectively in an environment where poor health literacy is prevalent. ETGAR may serve as a model for learning written communication skills during clinical years, using the assessment tool for formative or summative evaluation.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Low health literacy underpins health inequality and leads to poor adherence to medical care and higher risk of adverse events and rehospitalization. Communication in plain language, therefore, is an essential skill for health professionals to acquire. Most medical education communication skill programs focus on verbal communication, while written communication training is scarce. ETGAR is a student delivered service for vulnerable patients after hospital discharge in which, amongst other duties, students 'translate' the medical discharge letters into plain language and share them with patients at a home visit. This study ascertains how this plain language training impacted on students' written communication skills using a tool designed for purpose.
METHODS
METHODS
Students, in pairs, wrote three plain language discharge letters over the course of a year for patients whom they encountered in hospital. The students handed over and shared the letters with the patients during a post-discharge home visit. Structured feedback from course instructors was given for each letter. An assessment tool was developed to evaluate students' ability to tell the hospitalization narrative using plain and clear language. First and last letters were blindly evaluated for the entire cohort (74 letters; 87 students).
RESULTS
RESULTS
Students scored higher in all assessment categories in the third letters, with significant improvement in overall score 3.5 ± 0.8 vs 4.1 ± 0.6 Z = -3.43, p = 0.001. The assessment tool's reliability was high α = 0.797, it successfully differentiated between plain language categories, and its score was not affected by letter length or patient's medical condition.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Plain language discharge letters written for real patients in the context of experience-based learning improved in quality, providing students with skills to work effectively in an environment where poor health literacy is prevalent. ETGAR may serve as a model for learning written communication skills during clinical years, using the assessment tool for formative or summative evaluation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34320965
doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02842-1
pii: 10.1186/s12909-021-02842-1
pmc: PMC8320047
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
407Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Jul;34(7):1103-1104
pubmed: 30859512
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Jul;62(1):38-45
pubmed: 15964736
Int J Qual Health Care. 2016 Jun;28(3):384-90
pubmed: 27224995
Health Educ Res. 2005 Aug;20(4):423-9
pubmed: 15572437
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jul 23;15:282
pubmed: 26202163
Qual Saf Health Care. 2008 Feb;17(1):71-5
pubmed: 18245223
Med Teach. 2016 Jul;38(7):724-9
pubmed: 26609870
Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Sep;98(9):1137-41
pubmed: 26095344
Acad Med. 2016 Oct;91(10):1388-1391
pubmed: 27097051
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Oct;93(1):18-26
pubmed: 23199592
PeerJ. 2015 Mar 05;3:e819
pubmed: 25780771
Acad Med. 2003 Aug;78(8):802-9
pubmed: 12915371
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Jul 19;155(2):97-107
pubmed: 21768583
BMC Public Health. 2018 Oct 04;18(1):1157
pubmed: 30286744
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2014 Dec;19(5):721-49
pubmed: 24638146
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Mar 12;19(1):158
pubmed: 30866908
Acad Med. 2001 Apr;76(4):390-3
pubmed: 11299158
Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Nov;103(11):2335-2341
pubmed: 32423836
Mayo Clin Proc. 2018 Dec;93(12):1728-1738
pubmed: 30414733
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 15;9(4):e94670
pubmed: 24736389
BMC Nephrol. 2018 Aug 6;19(1):196
pubmed: 30081951
Health Lit Res Pract. 2018 Jan;2(1):e15-e20
pubmed: 30112462
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Mar 21;17(1):225
pubmed: 28327139
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2014 Sep;34(5):502-8
pubmed: 24697967
J Pediatr. 2019 Feb;205:35-40.e1
pubmed: 30366772
Am J Med Qual. 2013 Sep-Oct;28(5):383-91
pubmed: 23354870
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Feb;29(2):283-9
pubmed: 23918162
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Jun;91(3):265-70
pubmed: 23352913
J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Aug;21(8):888-90
pubmed: 16881953
BMC Med Educ. 2013 Aug 23;13:114
pubmed: 23971879
BMJ Open. 2015 Jun 11;5(6):e006975
pubmed: 26068508
Healthc (Amst). 2014 Jul;2(2):136-44
pubmed: 26250382
Med Teach. 2002 Nov;24(6):585-9
pubmed: 12623449