Impact of baseline beta-blocker use on inotrope response and clinical outcomes in cardiogenic shock: a subgroup analysis of the DOREMI trial.
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists
/ adverse effects
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cardiotonic Agents
/ administration & dosage
Dobutamine
/ adverse effects
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Double-Blind Method
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Milrinone
/ adverse effects
Mortality
/ trends
Outcome Assessment, Health Care
/ methods
Shock, Cardiogenic
/ drug therapy
Beta-blocker
Cardiogenic shock
Dobutamine
Inotropes
Milrinone
Journal
Critical care (London, England)
ISSN: 1466-609X
Titre abrégé: Crit Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9801902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 08 2021
10 08 2021
Historique:
received:
29
10
2020
accepted:
19
02
2021
entrez:
11
8
2021
pubmed:
12
8
2021
medline:
21
10
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Cardiogenic shock (CS) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The impact of beta-blocker (BB) use on patients who develop CS remains unknown. We sought to evaluate the clinical outcomes and hemodynamic response profiles in patients treated with BB in the 24 h prior to the development of CS. Patients with CS enrolled in the DObutamine compaREd to MIlrinone trial were analyzed. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality, resuscitated cardiac arrest, need for cardiac transplant or mechanical circulatory support, non-fatal myocardial infarction, transient ischemic attack or stroke, or initiation of renal replacement therapy. Secondary outcomes included the individual components of the primary composite and hemodynamic response profiles derived from pulmonary artery catheters. Among 192 participants, 93 patients (48%) had received BB therapy. The primary outcome occurred in 47 patients (51%) in the BB group and in 52 (53%) in the no BB group (RR 0.96; 95% CI 0.73-1.27; P = 0.78) throughout the in-hospital period. There were fewer early deaths in the BB group (RR 0.41; 95% CI 0.18-0.95; P = 0.03). There were no differences in other individual components of the primary outcome or in hemodynamic response between the two groups throughout the remainder of the hospitalization. BB therapy in the 24 h preceding the development of CS did not negatively influence clinical outcomes or hemodynamic parameters. On the contrary, BB use was associated with fewer deaths in the early resuscitation period, suggesting a paradoxically protective effect in patients with CS. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03207165.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Cardiogenic shock (CS) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The impact of beta-blocker (BB) use on patients who develop CS remains unknown. We sought to evaluate the clinical outcomes and hemodynamic response profiles in patients treated with BB in the 24 h prior to the development of CS.
METHODS
Patients with CS enrolled in the DObutamine compaREd to MIlrinone trial were analyzed. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality, resuscitated cardiac arrest, need for cardiac transplant or mechanical circulatory support, non-fatal myocardial infarction, transient ischemic attack or stroke, or initiation of renal replacement therapy. Secondary outcomes included the individual components of the primary composite and hemodynamic response profiles derived from pulmonary artery catheters.
RESULTS
Among 192 participants, 93 patients (48%) had received BB therapy. The primary outcome occurred in 47 patients (51%) in the BB group and in 52 (53%) in the no BB group (RR 0.96; 95% CI 0.73-1.27; P = 0.78) throughout the in-hospital period. There were fewer early deaths in the BB group (RR 0.41; 95% CI 0.18-0.95; P = 0.03). There were no differences in other individual components of the primary outcome or in hemodynamic response between the two groups throughout the remainder of the hospitalization.
CONCLUSIONS
BB therapy in the 24 h preceding the development of CS did not negatively influence clinical outcomes or hemodynamic parameters. On the contrary, BB use was associated with fewer deaths in the early resuscitation period, suggesting a paradoxically protective effect in patients with CS. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03207165.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34376218
doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03706-2
pii: 10.1186/s13054-021-03706-2
pmc: PMC8356445
doi:
Substances chimiques
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists
0
Cardiotonic Agents
0
Dobutamine
3S12J47372
Milrinone
JU9YAX04C7
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03207165']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
289Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2001 May;3(3):224-31
pubmed: 11305977
BMJ. 2003 Jun 28;326(7404):1450-2
pubmed: 12829561
Circulation. 1986 Dec;74(6):1290-302
pubmed: 3022962
N Engl J Med. 2021 Aug 5;385(6):516-525
pubmed: 34347952
Circulation. 2017 Oct 17;136(16):e232-e268
pubmed: 28923988
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 May 27;63(20):2069-2078
pubmed: 24530672
Circulation. 2018 Sep 25;138(13):e272-e391
pubmed: 29084731
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2019 Jan;72(1):40-47
pubmed: 29463462
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 2;64(21):e1-76
pubmed: 24685669
Eur Heart J. 2016 Jul 14;37(27):2129-2200
pubmed: 27206819
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002 Oct 2;40(7):1248-58
pubmed: 12383572
JAMA. 2002 Mar 27;287(12):1541-7
pubmed: 11911756
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jul 1;94(1):29-37
pubmed: 31104355
Acta Cardiol. 2010 Oct;65(5):565-70
pubmed: 21125979
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Aug 8;70(6):776-803
pubmed: 28461007
Can J Cardiol. 2017 Nov;33(11):1342-1433
pubmed: 29111106
Eur Heart J. 2019 Aug 21;40(32):2671-2683
pubmed: 31274157