Excited-State Lifetimes of DNA-Templated Cyanine Dimer, Trimer, and Tetramer Aggregates: The Role of Exciton Delocalization, Dye Separation, and DNA Heterogeneity.
Journal
The journal of physical chemistry. B
ISSN: 1520-5207
Titre abrégé: J Phys Chem B
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101157530
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 09 2021
16 09 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
3
9
2021
medline:
21
10
2021
entrez:
2
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
DNA-templated molecular (dye) aggregates are a novel class of materials that have garnered attention in a broad range of areas including light harvesting, sensing, and computing. Using DNA to template dye aggregation is attractive due to the relative ease with which DNA nanostructures can be assembled in solution, the diverse array of nanostructures that can be assembled, and the ability to precisely position dyes to within a few Angstroms of one another. These factors, combined with the programmability of DNA, raise the prospect of designer materials custom tailored for specific applications. Although considerable progress has been made in characterizing the optical properties and associated electronic structures of these materials, less is known about their excited-state dynamics. For example, little is known about how the excited-state lifetime, a parameter essential to many applications, is influenced by structural factors, such as the number of dyes within the aggregate and their spatial arrangement. In this work, we use a combination of transient absorption spectroscopy and global target analysis to measure excited-state lifetimes in a series of DNA-templated cyanine dye aggregates. Specifically, we investigate six distinct dimer, trimer, and tetramer aggregates-based on the ubiquitous cyanine dye Cy5-templated using both duplex and Holliday junction DNA nanostructures. We find that these DNA-templated Cy5 aggregates all exhibit significantly reduced excited-state lifetimes, some by more than 2 orders of magnitude, and observe considerable variation among the lifetimes. We attribute the reduced excited-state lifetimes to enhanced nonradiative decay and proceed to discuss various structural factors, including exciton delocalization, dye separation, and DNA heterogeneity, that may contribute to the observed reduction and variability of excited-state lifetimes. Guided by insights from structural modeling, we find that the reduced lifetimes and enhanced nonradiative decay are most strongly correlated with the distance between the dyes. These results inform potential tradeoffs between dye separation, excitonic coupling strength, and excited-state lifetime that motivate deeper mechanistic understanding, potentially via further dye and dye template design.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34473494
doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.1c04517
pmc: PMC8450906
doi:
Substances chimiques
Coloring Agents
0
DNA, Cruciform
0
Quinolines
0
DNA
9007-49-2
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
10240-10259Références
J Phys Chem A. 2020 Dec 10;124(49):10143-10151
pubmed: 33245238
Acc Chem Res. 2017 Feb 21;50(2):341-350
pubmed: 28145688
Nature. 2002 Nov 7;420(6911):102-6
pubmed: 12422224
J Phys Chem B. 2016 Sep 1;120(34):8845-62
pubmed: 27490865
Chem Soc Rev. 2011 Dec;40(12):5815-28
pubmed: 21660343
J Am Chem Soc. 2021 Feb 10;143(5):2256-2263
pubmed: 33529009
J Phys Chem B. 2020 Oct 29;124(43):9636-9647
pubmed: 33052691
Chemphyschem. 2003 Aug 18;4(8):793-808
pubmed: 12961976
J Am Chem Soc. 2005 Mar 9;127(9):3156-64
pubmed: 15740155
Chem Rev. 2018 Aug 8;118(15):7069-7163
pubmed: 29664617
Science. 2001 Oct 5;294(5540):93-6
pubmed: 11588250
Faraday Discuss. 2019 Jul 11;216(0):211-235
pubmed: 31038134
ACS Nano. 2018 Jul 24;12(7):6410-6420
pubmed: 29920202
Nature. 2016 Sep 14;537(7620):320-7
pubmed: 27629638
Nat Chem. 2011 Sep 23;3(10):763-74
pubmed: 21941248
J Phys Chem Lett. 2020 May 21;11(10):4163-4172
pubmed: 32391695
Chem Commun (Camb). 2013 Jun 11;49(46):5298-300
pubmed: 23636273
Nat Struct Biol. 1999 Oct;6(10):897-9
pubmed: 10504716
ACS Nano. 2019 Mar 26;13(3):2986-2994
pubmed: 30758934
J Chem Phys. 2018 Feb 28;148(8):085101
pubmed: 29495791
Annu Rev Biophys. 2017 May 22;46:23-42
pubmed: 28301774
ACS Photonics. 2015 Mar 18;2(3):398-404
pubmed: 25839049
Science. 2012 Nov 23;338(6110):1042-6
pubmed: 23180855
Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2016 Sep 31;15(9):1103-1114
pubmed: 27534913
ACS Nano. 2019 Oct 22;13(10):12006-12014
pubmed: 31518102
Science. 2016 Jul 22;353(6297):389-94
pubmed: 27463675
Nano Lett. 2012 Apr 11;12(4):2117-22
pubmed: 22401838
Acc Chem Res. 2014 Jun 17;47(6):1816-24
pubmed: 24849225
Biophys J. 1983 Nov;44(2):201-9
pubmed: 6197102
J Phys Chem B. 2018 May 17;122(19):5020-5029
pubmed: 29698610
Nature. 2015 Jul 9;523(7559):196-9
pubmed: 26156373
Nature. 2006 Mar 16;440(7082):297-302
pubmed: 16541064
Acc Chem Res. 2008 Dec;41(12):1596-608
pubmed: 18616298
J Phys Chem B. 2014 Dec 18;118(50):14555-65
pubmed: 25397906
J Phys Chem B. 2016 Jan 28;120(3):440-54
pubmed: 26781668
J Mol Biol. 2004 Aug 13;341(3):739-51
pubmed: 15288783
J Phys Chem B. 2021 Aug 26;125(33):9426-9440
pubmed: 34379430
J Phys Chem A. 2018 Mar 1;122(8):2086-2095
pubmed: 29420037
J Theor Biol. 1982 Nov 21;99(2):237-47
pubmed: 6188926
Nature. 1998 Aug 6;394(6693):539-44
pubmed: 9707114
J Phys Chem A. 2017 Sep 21;121(37):6905-6916
pubmed: 28813152
J Phys Chem Lett. 2019 May 16;10(10):2386-2392
pubmed: 31010285
Chem Sci. 2020 Jul 22;11(32):8546-8557
pubmed: 34123114
Chem Rev. 2016 Nov 23;116(22):13279-13412
pubmed: 27723323
Radiat Res. 1963 Sep;20:55-70
pubmed: 14061481
Biopolymers. 2013 Dec;99(12):923-54
pubmed: 23840028
Chem Rev. 2017 Jan 25;117(2):249-293
pubmed: 27428615
Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Aug;37(15):5001-6
pubmed: 19531737