Detection of NTRK fusions in glioblastoma: fluorescent in situ hybridisation is more useful than pan-TRK immunohistochemistry as a screening tool prior to RNA sequencing.


Journal

Pathology
ISSN: 1465-3931
Titre abrégé: Pathology
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0175411

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2022
Historique:
received: 31 10 2020
revised: 21 05 2021
accepted: 26 05 2021
pubmed: 15 9 2021
medline: 9 3 2022
entrez: 14 9 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Glioblastomas are frequent malignant brain tumours with a very poor prognosis and a need for new and efficient therapeutic strategies. With the approval of anti-TRK targeted therapies to treat patients with advanced NTRK-rearranged cancers, independent of the type of cancer, potential new treatment opportunities are available for the 0.5-5% of patients with NTRK-rearranged glioblastomas. Identification of these rare NTRK-rearranged glioblastomas requires efficient diagnostic tools and strategies which are evaluated in this study. We compared the results of NTRK1, NTRK2 and NTRK3 fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH) assays to those of pan-TRK immunohistochemistry (IHC) using two EPR17341 and A7H6R clones in a set of 196 patients with glioblastomas. Cases with at least 15% of positive nuclei using FISH analyses were further analysed using RNA sequencing. Above the 15% threshold, seven positive glioblastomas (3.57%) were identified by FISH assays (4 NTRK1, 3 NTRK2, no NTRK3). NTRK rearrangements were confirmed by RNA sequencing analyses in four cases [1 LMNA-NTRK1, 1 PRKAR2A-NTRK2, 1 SPECC1L-NTRK2 and 1 NACC2-NTRK2 fusions, i.e., 4/196 (2%) of NTRK-rearranged tumours in our series] but no rearrangement was detected in three samples with less than 30% of positive tumour nuclei as determined by NTRK1 FISH. Pan-TRK immunostaining showed major discrepancies when using either the EPR17341 or the A7H6R clones for the following criteria: main intensity, H-Score based scoring and homogeneity/heterogeneity of staining (Kappa values <0.2). This led to defining adequate criteria to identify NTRK-rearranged gliomas exhibiting strong and diffuse immunostaining contrasting to the variable and heterogeneous staining in non-NTRK-rearranged gliomas (p<0.0001). As assessing NTRK rearrangements has become crucial for glioma therapy, FISH seems to be a valuable tool to maximise access to TRK testing in patients with glioblastomas. In contrast to other cancers, pan-TRK IHC appears of limited interest in this field because there is no 'on/off' IHC positivity criterion to distinguish between NTRK-rearranged and non-NTRK-rearranged gliomas. RNA sequencing analyses are necessary in FISH positive cases with less than 30% positive nuclei, to avoid false positivity when scoring is close to the detection threshold.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34518039
pii: S0031-3025(21)00429-3
doi: 10.1016/j.pathol.2021.05.100
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Biomarkers, Tumor 0
Oncogene Proteins, Fusion 0
Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases EC 2.7.10.1
Receptor, trkA EC 2.7.10.1
Receptor, trkC EC 2.7.10.1

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

55-62

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Amélie Bourhis (A)

CHRU Brest, Department of Pathology, Brest, France.

Charline Caumont (C)

CHU Bordeaux, Department of Tumor Biology, Pessac, France; Inserm U1053 BaRITOn and Univ Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.

Isabelle Quintin-Roué (I)

CHRU Brest, Department of Pathology, Brest, France.

Elsa Magro (E)

CHRU Brest, Department of Neurosurgery, Brest, France; Inserm U1101 LaTIM, Brest, France.

Gurvan Dissaux (G)

Inserm U1101 LaTIM, Brest, France; CHRU Brest, Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Brest, France.

Annabelle Remoué (A)

CHRU Brest, Department of Pathology, Brest, France.

Pierre Le Noac'h (P)

CHRU Brest, Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Brest, France.

Nathalie Douet-Guilbert (N)

CHRU Brest, Cytogenetics Unit, Department of Genetics, Brest, France; Inserm U1078, Brest, France.

Romuald Seizeur (R)

CHRU Brest, Department of Neurosurgery, Brest, France; Inserm U1101 LaTIM, Brest, France.

Alexandra Tyulyandina (A)

CHRU Brest, Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Brest, France.

Ulrike Schick (U)

Inserm U1101 LaTIM, Brest, France; CHRU Brest, Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Brest, France.

Jean-Philippe Merlio (JP)

CHU Bordeaux, Department of Tumor Biology, Pessac, France; Inserm U1053 BaRITOn and Univ Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.

Pascale Marcorelles (P)

CHRU Brest, Department of Pathology, Brest, France; EA 4685 LIEN, Brest, France.

David Cappellen (D)

CHU Bordeaux, Department of Tumor Biology, Pessac, France; Inserm U1053 BaRITOn and Univ Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.

Arnaud Uguen (A)

CHRU Brest, Department of Pathology, Brest, France; Univ Brest, Inserm, CHU de Brest, LBAI, UMR1227, Brest, France. Electronic address: arnaud.uguen@chu-brest.fr.

Articles similaires

Genome, Chloroplast Phylogeny Genetic Markers Base Composition High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C

Classifications MeSH