Measurement properties of UCLA Activity Scale for hip and knee arthroplasty patients and translation and cultural adaptation into Danish.
Journal
Acta orthopaedica
ISSN: 1745-3682
Titre abrégé: Acta Orthop
Pays: Sweden
ID NLM: 101231512
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2021
Dec 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
18
9
2021
medline:
15
12
2021
entrez:
17
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Background and purpose - The UCLA Activity Scale (UCLA) is a questionnaire assessing physical activity level from 1 (low) to 10 (high) in patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty (HA/KA). After translation and cultural adaptation, we evaluated the measurement properties of the Danish UCLA.Patients and methods - After dual panel translation, cognitive interviews were performed among 55 HA/KA patients. An orthopedic surgeon and a physiotherapist estimated UCLA scores for 80 KA patients based on short interviews. Measurement properties were evaluated in 130 HA and 134 KA patients preoperatively and 1-year postoperatively.Results - To suit Danish patients of today, several adaptations were required. Prior to interviews, 4 patients were excluded, and 11 misinterpreted the answer options. Examiners rated the remaining 65 patients (mean age 67 years) 0.2-1.6 UCLA levels lower than patients themselves. The 130 HA and 134 KA patients (mean age 71/68 years) changed from 4.3 (SD 1.9)/4.5 (1.8) preoperatively to 6.6 (1.8)/6.2 (1.0) at 1-year follow-up. 103 (79%) HA and 89 (66%) KA patients reported increased activity. Effect sizes were large (1.2/0.96). Knee patients reaching minimal important change (MIC, ≥ 8 Oxford Knee Score points) had higher 1-year UCLA scores than patients not reaching MIC.Interpretation - Original scale development was undocumented. Content validity was questionable, and there was discrepancy between patient and examiner estimates. UCLA appears valuable for measuring change in self-reported physical activity on a group level. 4 out of 5 HA patients and 2 out of 3 KA patients were more physically active 1 year after joint replacement surgery.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34530681
doi: 10.1080/17453674.2021.1977533
pmc: PMC8635665
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
681-688Références
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Jan;68(1):73-9
pubmed: 25441700
J Arthroplasty. 2015 Feb;30(2):176-91
pubmed: 25449591
Acta Orthop. 2018 Oct;89(5):541-547
pubmed: 29860936
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007 Aug;89(8):1010-4
pubmed: 17785736
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Jul;477(7):1632-1644
pubmed: 30801280
Value Health. 2005 Mar-Apr;8(2):89-91
pubmed: 15804316
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998 Jan;80(1):63-9
pubmed: 9460955
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984 Feb;66(2):228-41
pubmed: 6693450
Lancet. 2018 Nov 3;392(10158):1672-1682
pubmed: 30496082
J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Jan;60(1):34-42
pubmed: 17161752
Bone Joint J. 2015 Jan;97-B(1):3-9
pubmed: 25568406
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Feb;475(2):542-548
pubmed: 27785671
Bone Joint J. 2017 Aug;99-B(8):1037-1046
pubmed: 28768780
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74
pubmed: 843571
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Jan;64(1):96-106
pubmed: 21130355
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1147-1157
pubmed: 29435801
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Nov 18;11:152; author reply 152
pubmed: 22099330
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011 Jun;19(6):620-33
pubmed: 21251989
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996 Mar;78(2):185-90
pubmed: 8666621
Value Health. 2004 Sep-Oct;7 Suppl 1:S27-30
pubmed: 15367241
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011 Aug 18;12:190
pubmed: 21851618
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Apr;68(4):435-41
pubmed: 25698408
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Apr;467(4):958-65
pubmed: 18587624
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2014 Feb;29(2):127-36
pubmed: 23765914
J Arthroplasty. 1998 Dec;13(8):890-5
pubmed: 9880181
Br J Sports Med. 2003 Jun;37(3):197-206; discussion 206
pubmed: 12782543
Acta Orthop. 2016 Jul;87 Suppl 1:9-23
pubmed: 27228230