Association of enteropathogen detection with diarrhoea by age and high versus low child mortality settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Journal
The Lancet. Global health
ISSN: 2214-109X
Titre abrégé: Lancet Glob Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101613665
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2021
10 2021
Historique:
received:
19
01
2021
revised:
25
06
2021
accepted:
06
07
2021
entrez:
17
9
2021
pubmed:
18
9
2021
medline:
29
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The odds ratio (OR) comparing pathogen presence in diarrhoeal cases versus asymptomatic controls is a measure for diarrhoeal disease cause that has been integrated into burden of disease estimates across diverse populations. This study aimed to estimate the OR describing the association between pathogen detection in stool and diarrhoea for 15 common enteropathogens by age group and child mortality setting. We did a systematic review to identify case-control and cohort studies published from Jan 1, 1990, to July 9, 2019, which examined at least one enteropathogen of interest and the outcome diarrhoea. The analytical dataset included data extracted from published articles and supplemented with data from the Global Enteric Multicenter Study and the Malnutrition and Enteric Disease study. Random effects meta-analysis models were fit for each enteropathogen, stratified by age group and child mortality level, and adjusted for pathogen detection method and study design to produce summary ORs describing the association between pathogen detection in stool and diarrhoea. 1964 records were screened and 130 studies (over 88 079 cases or diarrhoea samples and 135 755 controls or non-diarrhoea samples) were available for analysis. Heterogeneity (I Incorporating effect estimates from diverse data sources into diarrhoeal disease cause and burden of disease models is needed to produce more representative estimates. WHO, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and National Institutes of Health.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The odds ratio (OR) comparing pathogen presence in diarrhoeal cases versus asymptomatic controls is a measure for diarrhoeal disease cause that has been integrated into burden of disease estimates across diverse populations. This study aimed to estimate the OR describing the association between pathogen detection in stool and diarrhoea for 15 common enteropathogens by age group and child mortality setting.
METHODS
We did a systematic review to identify case-control and cohort studies published from Jan 1, 1990, to July 9, 2019, which examined at least one enteropathogen of interest and the outcome diarrhoea. The analytical dataset included data extracted from published articles and supplemented with data from the Global Enteric Multicenter Study and the Malnutrition and Enteric Disease study. Random effects meta-analysis models were fit for each enteropathogen, stratified by age group and child mortality level, and adjusted for pathogen detection method and study design to produce summary ORs describing the association between pathogen detection in stool and diarrhoea.
FINDINGS
1964 records were screened and 130 studies (over 88 079 cases or diarrhoea samples and 135 755 controls or non-diarrhoea samples) were available for analysis. Heterogeneity (I
INTERPRETATION
Incorporating effect estimates from diverse data sources into diarrhoeal disease cause and burden of disease models is needed to produce more representative estimates.
FUNDING
WHO, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and National Institutes of Health.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34534487
pii: S2214-109X(21)00316-8
doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00316-8
pmc: PMC8456779
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e1402-e1410Subventions
Organisme : World Health Organization
ID : 001
Pays : International
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R01 GM124280
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 World Health Organization; licensee Elsevier. This is an Open Access article published under the CC BY 3.0 IGO license which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. In any use of this article, there should be no suggestion that WHO endorses any specific organisation, products or services. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. This notice should be preserved along with the article's original URL.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of interests VEP has received reimbursement from Merck and Pfizer for travel expenses unrelated to the topic of this Article, and is a member of the WHO Immunization and Vaccine-related Implementation Research Advisory Committee. BAL reports grants and personal fees from Takeda Pharmaceuticals. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Références
Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 Nov;18(11):1211-1228
pubmed: 30243583
Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Dec;55 Suppl 4:S246-53
pubmed: 23169937
Epidemics. 2016 Dec;17:56-63
pubmed: 27915211
Vaccine. 2020 Jun 26;38(31):4792-4800
pubmed: 32253097
Lancet Infect Dis. 2019 Feb;19(2):128
pubmed: 30712833
J Infect Dis. 2002 Dec 15;186(12):1740-7
pubmed: 12447759
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Dec;6(12):e1309-e1318
pubmed: 30287127
Am J Epidemiol. 2014 Feb 15;179(4):507-12
pubmed: 24305574
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2009 Mar;28(3 Suppl):S54-6
pubmed: 19252424
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019 Jan 4;13(1):e0007037
pubmed: 30608930
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 Oct;24(10):1039-1045
pubmed: 29964231
Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Dec;55 Suppl 4:S303-11
pubmed: 23169942
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1998 Jun;17(6):482-8
pubmed: 9655539
N Engl J Med. 2011 Jul 28;365(4):337-46
pubmed: 21793745
Lancet. 2013 Jul 20;382(9888):209-22
pubmed: 23680352
Lancet. 2016 Sep 24;388(10051):1291-301
pubmed: 27673470