An update on current EPAs in graduate medical education: A scoping review.


Journal

Medical education online
ISSN: 1087-2981
Titre abrégé: Med Educ Online
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9806550

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2021
Historique:
entrez: 27 9 2021
pubmed: 28 9 2021
medline: 29 9 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The purpose of this scoping review is to update the recent progress of EPAs research in GME, focusing on the topical concern of EPAs effectiveness, and to provide a reference for medical researchers in countries/regions interested in introducing EPAs. Guided by Arksey and O'Malley's framework regarding scoping reviews, the researchers, in January 2021, conducted a search in five databases to ensure the comprehensiveness of the literature. After the predetermined process, 29 articles in total were included in this study. The most common areas for the implementation and evaluation of EPAs were Surgery (n = 7,24.1%), Pediatric (n = 5,17.2%) and Internal medicine (n = 4,13.8%), a result that shows a relatively large change in the research trend of EPAs in the last two years. Prior to 2018, EPAs research focused on internal medicine, psychiatry, family medicine, and primary care. The articles in the category of EPAs implementation and evaluation had four main themes: (1) validation of EPAs (n = 16,55.2%); (2) describing the experience of implementing EPAs (n = 11,37.9%); (3) examining the factors and barriers that influence the implementation and evaluation of EPAs (n = 6,20.6%); and (4) researching the experiences of faculty, interns, and other relevant personnel in using EPAs. Training programs were the most common EPAs implementation setting (n = 26,89.6%); direct observation and evaluation (n = 12,41.4%), and evaluation by scoring reports (n = 5,17.2%) were the two most common means of assessing physicians' EPA levels; 19 papers (65.5%) used faculty evaluation, and nine of these papers also used self-assessment (31.0%); the most frequently used tools in the evaluation of EPAs were mainly researcher-made instruments (n = 37.9%), assessment form (n = 7,24.1%), and mobile application (n = 6,20.7%). Although EPAs occupy an increasingly important place in international medical education, this study concludes that the implementation and diffusion of EPAs on a larger scale is still difficult.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34569433
doi: 10.1080/10872981.2021.1981198
pmc: PMC8477952
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1981198

Références

Med Educ. 2019 Mar;53(3):234-249
pubmed: 30609093
J Cancer Educ. 2020 Feb;35(1):165-177
pubmed: 30604387
Acad Med. 2016 Feb;91(2):191-8
pubmed: 26630606
Perspect Med Educ. 2020 Aug;9(4):210-219
pubmed: 32504446
Med Sci Educ. 2019 Jan 10;29(1):247-253
pubmed: 34457474
Med J Aust. 2019 May;210(8):354-359
pubmed: 30977150
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jan;35(1):331-335
pubmed: 31667752
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1919316
pubmed: 31940042
Acad Pediatr. 2019 May - Jun;19(4):410-413
pubmed: 30476674
CJEM. 2019 Nov;21(6):803-806
pubmed: 31771686
J Surg Educ. 2020 Nov - Dec;77(6):e220-e228
pubmed: 32747323
J Surg Educ. 2020 Jul - Aug;77(4):739-748
pubmed: 32044326
J Surg Educ. 2019 Sep - Oct;76(5):1174-1186
pubmed: 31029575
Indian J Public Health. 2019 Oct-Dec;63(4):277-281
pubmed: 32189644
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Oct;71(Suppl 1):671-678
pubmed: 31742040
Med Teach. 2015;37(11):983-1002
pubmed: 26172347
J Grad Med Educ. 2019 Aug;11(4):430-438
pubmed: 31440338
Acad Pediatr. 2021 May-Jun;21(4):735-741
pubmed: 33221495
Med Educ. 2005 Dec;39(12):1176-7
pubmed: 16313574
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 19;18(1):143
pubmed: 30453902
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Mar 23;13:48
pubmed: 23522333
Transfusion. 2020 May;60(5):912-917
pubmed: 31970781
J Grad Med Educ. 2019 Apr;11(2):214-220
pubmed: 31024656
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Nov 23;20(1):452
pubmed: 33228704
J Cancer Educ. 2020 Oct 27;:
pubmed: 33108804
Am J Surg. 2020 Jul;220(1):4-7
pubmed: 31526512
J Surg Educ. 2020 Nov - Dec;77(6):1562-1567
pubmed: 32540120
J Grad Med Educ. 2019 Aug;11(4 Suppl):158-164
pubmed: 31428274
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Jan;99(1):81-85
pubmed: 31464758
Ir J Med Sci. 2020 Nov;189(4):1379-1389
pubmed: 32248341
MedEdPORTAL. 2019 Nov 22;15:10854
pubmed: 31934616
J Surg Educ. 2020 May - Jun;77(3):520-526
pubmed: 31948866
J Dent Educ. 2020 Sep;84(9):955-963
pubmed: 32822089

Auteurs

Lu Liu (L)

Institute of Medical Education, Peking University, Beijing, China.
National Center for Health Professions Education Development, Peking University, Beijing, China.

Zhehan Jiang (Z)

Institute of Medical Education, Peking University, Beijing, China.
National Center for Health Professions Education Development, Peking University, Beijing, China.

Xin Qi (X)

Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.

A'Na Xie (A)

National Center for Health Professions Education Development, Peking University, Beijing, China.

Hongbin Wu (H)

Institute of Medical Education, Peking University, Beijing, China.
National Center for Health Professions Education Development, Peking University, Beijing, China.

Huaqin Cheng (H)

Institute of Medical Education, Peking University, Beijing, China.
National Center for Health Professions Education Development, Peking University, Beijing, China.

Weimin Wang (W)

National Center for Health Professions Education Development, Peking University, Beijing, China.

Haichao Li (H)

Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH