Technical Note: Long-term monitoring of diode sensitivity degradation induced by proton irradiation.


Journal

Medical physics
ISSN: 2473-4209
Titre abrégé: Med Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0425746

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2021
Historique:
revised: 03 09 2021
received: 13 04 2021
accepted: 20 09 2021
pubmed: 6 10 2021
medline: 18 11 2021
entrez: 5 10 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To measure diode sensitivity degradation (DSD) induced by cumulative proton dose delivered to a commercial daily quality assurance (QA) device. At our institution, six Daily QA 3 (DQA3, Sun Nuclear Corporation, Melbourne, FL, USA) devices have been used for daily proton pencil beam scanning QA in four proton gantry rooms over a span of 4 years. DQA3 diode counts were cross-calibrated using a homogenous field with a known dose of 1 Gy. The DSD rate (ΔR%/100 Gy) was calculated using linear regression on time-series plots of diode counts and an estimate of cumulative dose per year based on the cross-calibration. The effect of DSD on daily QA spot position measurements was quantified by converting DSD to baseline spot position shift. The average dose delivered to the four inner DQA3 diodes was 104 ± 5 Gy/year, and the rate of DSD was -5.1% ± 1.0/100 Gy with the exception of one DQA3 device that had a significantly higher rate of DSD (-12%/100 Gy). The R The DSD rate of DQA3 diodes determined by long-term proton daily QA data was about -5%/100 Gy, which is more than 10 times greater than the reported DSD rate from photon irradiation. DQA3 diodes may be used for daily proton QA programs, provided that they are recalibrated at an appropriate frequency that should be determined specifically for different daily QA programs.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34608990
doi: 10.1002/mp.15265
doi:

Substances chimiques

Protons 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

6634-6641

Informations de copyright

© 2021 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Références

Klein EE, Hanley J, Bayouth J, et al. Task Group 142 report: quality assurance of medical accelerators. Med Phys. 2009; 36(9): 4197-4212.
Arjomandy B, Taylor P, Ainsley C, et al. AAPM task group 224: comprehensive proton therapy machine quality assurance. Med Phys. 2019; 46(8): e678-e705.
Pacilio M, De Angelis C, Onori S, et al. Characteristics of silicon and diamond detectors in a 60 MeV proton beam. Phys Med Biol. 2002; 47(8): N107-N112.
Arjomandy B, Sahoo N, Zhu XR, et al. An overview of the comprehensive proton therapy machine quality assurance procedures implemented at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center Proton Therapy Center-Houston. Med Phys. 2009; 36(6): 2269-2282.
Zhu XR, Poenisch F, Song X, et al. Patient-specific quality assurance for prostate cancer patients receiving spot scanning proton therapy using single-field uniform dose. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011; 81(2): 552-559.
Lin LY, Kang ML, Solberg TD, et al. Use of a novel two-dimensional ionization chamber array for pencil beam scanning proton therapy beam quality assurance. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015; 16(3): 270-276.
Furukawa T, Inaniwa T, Hara Y, Mizushima K, Shirai T, Noda K. Patient-specific QA and delivery verification of scanned ion beam at NIRS-HIMAC. Med Phys. 2013; 40(12): 121707.
Ding X, Zheng Y, Zeidan O, et al. A novel daily QA system for proton therapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2013; 14(2): 4058.
Lambert J, Baumer C, Koska B, Ding X. Daily QA in proton therapy using a single commercially available detector. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014; 15(6): 5005.
Younkin JE, Shen J, Bues M, et al. Technical Note: an efficient daily QA procedure for proton pencil beam scanning. Med Phys. 2018. http://doi.org/10.1002/mp.12787
Letourneau D, Gulam M, Yan D, Oldham M, Wong JW. Evaluation of a 2D diode array for IMRT quality assurance. Radiother Oncol. 2004; 70(2): 199-206.
Jursinic PA, Nelms BE. A 2-D diode array and analysis software for verification of intensity modulated radiation therapy delivery. Med Phys. 2003; 30(5): 870-879.
Shen J, Tryggestad E, Younkin JE, et al. Technical Note: using experimentally determined proton spot scanning timing parameters to accurately model beam delivery time. Med Phys. 2017; 44(10): 5081-5088.
Younkin JE, Bues M, Sio TT, et al. Multiple energy extraction reduces beam delivery time for a synchrotron-based proton spot-scanning system. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2018; 3(3): 412-420.
AAPM Report No.87. Diode in vivo dosimetry for patients receiving external beam radiation therapy. Report of Task Group 62 of the Radiation Therapy committee. Medical Physics Publishing; 2005.
Liengsawangwong P, Sahoo N, Ding X, Lii M, Gillin MT, Zhu XR. Dosimetric characteristics of a two-dimensional diode array detector irradiated with passively scattered proton beams. Cancers (Basel). 2015; 7(3): 1425-1435.

Auteurs

James E Younkin (JE)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.

Daniel G Robertson (DG)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.

Wei Liu (W)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.

Yanle Hu (Y)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.

Danairis Hernandez Morales (DH)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.

Martin Bues (M)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.

Jiajian Shen (J)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.

Xiaoning Ding (X)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.

Articles similaires

Humans Female Precision Medicine Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted Breast Neoplasms
Adult Aged Female Humans Male
Humans Pancreatic Neoplasms Proton Therapy Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated
Humans Female Spinal Cord Male Kidney Neoplasms

Classifications MeSH