2,4-D and 2,4-D butoxyethyl ester behavior in Eurasian and hybrid watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spp.).
absorption
desorption
metabolism
non target-site resistance
translocation
Journal
Pest management science
ISSN: 1526-4998
Titre abrégé: Pest Manag Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100898744
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2022
Feb 2022
Historique:
revised:
01
10
2021
received:
24
08
2021
accepted:
09
10
2021
pubmed:
10
10
2021
medline:
12
1
2022
entrez:
9
10
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Hybrid watermilfoil is becoming more prevalent in many lakes where the invasive Eurasian (Myriophyllum spicatum, EWM) and native northern watermilfoil (M. sibiricum) co-occur. These Eurasian and northern watermilfoil hybrids (HWM) grow 30% faster and in many cases are less sensitive to 2,4-dichlorophenoxy acetic acid (2,4-D) than either parent. The mechanism(s) impacting 2,4-D tolerance in these hybrids was investigated by comparing the absorption, translocation, metabolism, and desorption of two 2,4-D formulations in EWM and HWM. 2,4-D absorption in EWM and HWM was 5.7 and 7.9 times the external herbicide concentration determined by the plant concentration factor, a metric used to determine herbicide bioaccumulation, and 2,4-D butoxyethyl ester absorption was 35.6 and 52.1 times the external concentration in EWM and HWM, respectively. Herbicide bioaccumulation was greater in HWM than in EWM. Herbicide translocation to HWM roots was limited at 192 HAT and herbicide desorption in HWM was slightly lower than EWM. No differences were found in herbicide metabolism between the two plant species. 2,4-D resistance in HWM is not due to non-target-site resistance as no differences in herbicide absorption, translocation, desorption and/or metabolism were identified; therefore, target-site resistance is the most likely resistance mechanism. More research is needed to identify the molecular basis for the 2,4-D-resistant trait in HWM. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Hybrid watermilfoil is becoming more prevalent in many lakes where the invasive Eurasian (Myriophyllum spicatum, EWM) and native northern watermilfoil (M. sibiricum) co-occur. These Eurasian and northern watermilfoil hybrids (HWM) grow 30% faster and in many cases are less sensitive to 2,4-dichlorophenoxy acetic acid (2,4-D) than either parent. The mechanism(s) impacting 2,4-D tolerance in these hybrids was investigated by comparing the absorption, translocation, metabolism, and desorption of two 2,4-D formulations in EWM and HWM.
RESULTS
RESULTS
2,4-D absorption in EWM and HWM was 5.7 and 7.9 times the external herbicide concentration determined by the plant concentration factor, a metric used to determine herbicide bioaccumulation, and 2,4-D butoxyethyl ester absorption was 35.6 and 52.1 times the external concentration in EWM and HWM, respectively. Herbicide bioaccumulation was greater in HWM than in EWM. Herbicide translocation to HWM roots was limited at 192 HAT and herbicide desorption in HWM was slightly lower than EWM. No differences were found in herbicide metabolism between the two plant species.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
2,4-D resistance in HWM is not due to non-target-site resistance as no differences in herbicide absorption, translocation, desorption and/or metabolism were identified; therefore, target-site resistance is the most likely resistance mechanism. More research is needed to identify the molecular basis for the 2,4-D-resistant trait in HWM. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry.
Substances chimiques
Esters
0
Herbicides
0
2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid
2577AQ9262
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
626-632Subventions
Organisme : Applied Biochemists
Organisme : Aquatic Plant Management Society
Informations de copyright
© 2021 Society of Chemical Industry.
Références
Gettys LA, Haller WT and Petty DG, Biology and Control of Aquatic Plants: A Best Management Practices Handbook. Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration Foundation, Marietta, GA (2020).
Smith CS and Barko JW, Ecology of Eurasian watermilfoil. J Aquat Plant Manage 28:55-64 (1990).
Newroth P, A review of Eurasian watermilfoil impacts and management in British Columbia, in Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum) and Related Haloragaceae Species. Vancouver, Aquatic Plant Management Society (1985, 1985).
Horsch EJ and Lewis DJ, The effects of aquatic invasive species on property values: evidence from a quasi-experiment. Land Econ 85:391-409 (2009).
Nikora V, Larned S, Nikora N, Debnath K, Cooper G and Reid M, Hydraulic resistance due to aquatic vegetation in small streams: field study. J Hydraul Eng 134:1326-1332 (2008).
Schultz R and Dibble E, Effects of invasive macrophytes on freshwater fish and macroinvertebrate communities: the role of invasive plant traits. Hydrobiologia 684:1-14 (2012).
Madsen JD, Sutherland JW, Bloomfield JA, Eichler LW and Boylen CW, The decline of native vegetation under dense Eurasian watermilfoil canopies. J Aquat Plant Manage 29:94-99 (1991).
Pimentel D, Invasive plants: their role in species extinctions and economic losses to agriculture in the USA, in Management of Invasive Weeds, ed. by Inderjit. Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 1-7 (2009).
Glisson WJ and Larkin DJ, Hybrid watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum × Myriophyllum sibiricum) exhibits traits associated with greater invasiveness than its introduced and native parental taxa. Biol Invas 23:2417-2433 (2021).
Taylor LL, Mcnair JN, Guastello P, Pashnick J and Thum RA, Heritable variation for vegetative growth rate in ten distinct genotypes of hybrid watermilfoil. J Aquat Plant Manage 55:51-57 (2017).
Thum RA and McNair JN, Inter-and intraspecific hybridization affects germination and vegetative growth in Eurasian watermilfoil. J Aquat Plant Manage 56:24-30 (2018).
Zuellig MP and Thum RA, Multiple introductions of invasive Eurasian watermilfoil and recurrent hybridization with northern watermilfoil in North America. J Aquat Plant Manage 50:1-19 (2012).
Getsinger KD, Davis GJ and Brinson MM, Changes in a Myriophyllum spicatum L. community following 2,4-D treatment. J Aquat Plant Manage 20:4-8 (1982).
Wersal RM, Madsen JD, Woolf TE and Eckberg N, Assessment of herbicide efficacy on Eurasian watermilfoil and impacts to the native submersed plant community in Hayden lake, Idaho, USA. J Aquat Plant Manage 48:5-11 (2010).
Larue EA, Zuellig MP, Netherland MD, Heilman MA and Thum RA, Hybrid watermilfoil lineages are more invasive and less sensitive to a commonly used herbicide than their exotic parent (Eurasian watermilfoil). Evol Appl 6:462-471 (2013).
Parks SR, McNair JN, Hausler P, Tyning P and Thum RA, Divergent responses of cryptic invasive watermilfoil to treatment with auxinic herbicides in a large Michigan lake. Lake Reserv Manage 32:366-372 (2016).
Nissen SJ. Aquatic uses of 2, 4-D and other phenoxy herbicides in the United States. In Benefits and Economic Assessment of 2,4-D and the Phenoxy Herbicides in the US: Industry Task Force II on 2,4-D Research Data (2015).
Todd OE, Figueiredo MR, Morran S, Soni N, Preston C, Kubeš MF et al., Synthetic auxin herbicides: finding the lock and key to weed resistance. Plant Sci 300:110631 (2020).
Ortiz MF, Nissen SJ, Thum R, Heilman MA and Dayan FE, Current status and future prospects of herbicide for aquatic weed management. Outlooks Pest Manage 31:270-275 (2020).
Grossmann K, Auxin herbicides: current status of mechanism and mode of action. Pest Manag Sci 66:113-120 (2010).
Dayan FE, Barker A, Bough R, Ortiz MF, Takano H and Duke SO, Herbicide mechanisms of action and resistance, in Comprehensive Biotechnology, ed. by Grodzinski B. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 36-48 (2020).
Poovey AG, Slade JG and Netherland MD, Susceptibility of Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum) and a milfoil hybrid (M. spicatum × M. sibiricum) to triclopyr and 2, 4-D amine. J Aquat Plant Manage 45:111-115 (2007).
Patterson EL, Fleming MB, Kessler KC, Nissen SJ and Gaines TA, A KASP genotyping method to identify northern watermilfoil, Eurasian watermilfoil, and their interspecific hybrids. Front Plant Sci 8:752 (2017).
Frank PA and Hodgson RH, A technique for studying absorption and translocation in submersed plants. Weeds 12:80-82 (1964).
Ortiz MF, Nissen SJ and Gray CJ, Endothall behavior in Myriophyllum spicatum and Hydrilla verticillata. Pest Manage Sci 75:2942-2947 (2019).
Figueiredo MRA, Leibhart LJ, Reicher ZJ, Tranel PJ, Nissen SJ, Westra P et al., Metabolism of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid contributes to resistance in a common waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) population. Pest Manage Sci 74:2356-2362 (2017).
Kniss AR, Vassios JD, Nissen SJ and Ritz C, Nonlinear regression analysis of herbicide absorption studies. Weed Sci 59:601-610 (2011).
de Carvalho RF, Bromilow RH and Greenwood R, Uptake of pesticides from water by curly waterweed Lagarosiphon major and lesser duckweed Lemna minor. Pest Manag Sci 63:789-797 (2007).
Haug EJ, Ahmed KA, Gannon TW and Richardson RJ, Absorption and translocation of florpyrauxifen-benzyl in ten aquatic plant species. Weed Sci (2021). https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2021.38
Vassios JD, Nissen SJ, Koschnick TJ and Heilman MA, Fluridone, penoxsulam, and triclopyr absorption and translocation by Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum) and hydrilla (Hydrilla verticillata). J Aquat Plant Manage 55:58-64 (2017).
Vassios JD, Nissen SJ and Brunk GR, Imazamox absorption, desorption, and metabolism by Eurasian watermilfoil. J Aquat Plant Manage 49:44-49 (2011).
Gaines TA, Duke SO, Morran S, Rigon CA, Tranel PJ, Küpper A et al., Mechanisms of evolved herbicide resistance. J Biol Chem 295:10307-10330 (2020).
Riar DS, Burke IC, Yenish JP, Bell J and Gill K, Inheritance and physiological basis for 2, 4-D resistance in prickly lettuce (Lactuca serriola L.). J Agric Food Chem 59:9417-9423 (2011).
Goggin DE, Cawthray GR and Powles SB, 2, 4-D resistance in wild radish: reduced herbicide translocation via inhibition of cellular transport. J Exp Bot 67:3223-3235 (2016).
Peniuk M, Romano M and Hall J, Physiological investigations into the resistance of a wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis L.) biotype to auxinic herbicides. Weed Res 33:431-440 (1993).
van Eerd LL, Stephenson GR, Kwiatkowski J, Grossmann K and Hall JC, Physiological and biochemical characterization of quinclorac resistance in a false cleavers (Galium spurium L.) biotype. J Agric Food Chem 53:1144-1151 (2005).
Cranston HJ, Kern AJ, Hackett JL, Miller EK, Maxwell BD and Dyer WE, Dicamba resistance in kochia. Weed Sci 49:164-170 (2001).
Fuerst E, Sterling T, Norman M, Prather T, Irzyk G, Wu Y et al., Physiological characterization of picloram resistance in yellow starthistle. Pest Biochem Physol 56:149-161 (1996).
Valenzuela-Valenzuela JM, Lownds NK and Sterling TM, Clopyralid uptake, translocation, metabolism, and ethylene induction in picloram-resistant yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis L.). Pest Biochem Physol 71:11-19 (2001).