Evaluating the failure to bloom in dark-cutting and lactate-enhanced beef longissimus steaks.


Journal

Meat science
ISSN: 1873-4138
Titre abrégé: Meat Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101160862

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2022
Historique:
received: 11 09 2020
revised: 25 05 2021
accepted: 20 09 2021
pubmed: 17 10 2021
medline: 15 12 2021
entrez: 16 10 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Previous studies have noted lower L* (lightness) values for both dark-cutting beef and normal-pH beef enhanced with lactate. In the current study, absorption-coefficient, scattering-coefficient, CIE L*a*b* values, refractive index of sarcoplasm, and inter-muscle bundle space were evaluated for dark-cutting beef, normal-pH beef enhanced with lactate, normal-pH beef enhanced with water, and normal-pH beef not enhanced with either water or lactate. Compared with non-enhanced loins, lactate-enhancement had lower a*, chroma, oxymyoglobin, reflectance, scattering, and inter-muscle bundle space as well as greater absorption and refractive index. Dark-cutting steaks had lower a*, chroma, oxymyoglobin values, reflectance, and scattering as well as less inter-muscle bundle space compared with lactate-enhanced steaks. Sarcoplasm refractive index values were greater in lactate-enhanced steaks than dark-cutting steaks. The results suggest that changes in muscle structure and optical properties due to either pH or lactate addition can alter muscle darkening and blooming properties.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34656000
pii: S0309-1740(21)00260-6
doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2021.108684
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Myoglobin 0
oxymyoglobin 0
Lactic Acid 33X04XA5AT

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

108684

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Ranjith Ramanathan (R)

Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Oklahoma State University Stillwater, OK 74078, United States. Electronic address: ranjith.ramanathan@okstate.edu.

Richard A Mancini (RA)

Department of Animal Science, University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06269, United States.

Murali R Konda (MR)

Department of Animal Science, University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06269, United States.

Keith Bailey (K)

Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Urbana, IL 61802, United States.

Sunil More (S)

Veterinary Pathobiology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, United States.

Gretchen G Mafi (GG)

Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Oklahoma State University Stillwater, OK 74078, United States.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH