Comparative phenotypic and transcriptomic analyses unravel conserved and distinct mechanisms underlying shade avoidance syndrome in Brassicaceae vegetables.


Journal

BMC genomics
ISSN: 1471-2164
Titre abrégé: BMC Genomics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100965258

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
25 Oct 2021
Historique:
received: 30 11 2020
accepted: 11 10 2021
entrez: 26 10 2021
pubmed: 27 10 2021
medline: 28 10 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Plants grown under shade are exposed to low red/far-red ratio, thereby triggering an array of altered phenotypes called shade avoidance syndrome (SAS). Shade negatively influences plant growth, leading to a reduction in agricultural productivity. Understanding of SAS is crucial for sustainable agricultural practices, especially for high-density indoor farming. Brassicaceae vegetables are widely consumed around the world and are commonly cultivated in indoor farms. However, our understanding of SAS in Brassicaceae vegetables and their genome-wide transcriptional regulatory networks are still largely unexplored. Shade induced common signs of SAS, including hypocotyl elongation and reduced carotenoids/anthocyanins biosynthesis, in two different Brassicaceae species: Brassica rapa (Choy Sum and Pak Choy) and Brassica oleracea (Kai Lan). Phenotype-assisted transcriptome analysis identified a set of genes induced by shade in these species, many of which were related to auxin biosynthesis and signaling [e.g. YUCCA8 (YUC8), YUC9, and INDOLE-3-ACETIC ACID INDUCIBLE (IAAs)] and other phytohormones signaling pathways including brassinosteroids and ethylene. The genes functioning in plant defense (e.g. MYB29 and JASMONATE-ZIM-DOMAIN PROTEIN 9) as well as in biosynthesis of anthocyanins and glucosinolates were repressed upon shade. Besides, each species also exhibited distinct SAS phenotypes. Shade strongly reduced primary roots and elongated petioles of B. oleracea, Kai Lan. However, these SAS phenotypes were not clearly recognized in B. rapa, Choy Sum and Pak Choy. Some auxin signaling genes (e.g. AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR 19, IAA10, and IAA20) were specifically induced in B. oleracea, while homologs in B. rapa were not up-regulated under shade. Contrastingly, shade-exposed B. rapa vegetables triggered the ethylene signaling pathway earlier than B. oleracea, Kai Lan. Interestingly, shade induced the transcript levels of LONG HYPOCOTYL IN FAR-RED 1 (HFR1) homolog in only Pak Choy as B. rapa. As HFR1 is a key negative regulator of SAS in Arabidopsis, our finding suggests that Pak Choy HFR1 homolog may also function in conferring higher shade tolerance in this variety. Our study shows that two Brassicaceae species not only share a conserved SAS mechanism but also exhibit distinct responses to shade, which will provide comprehensive information to develop new shade-tolerant cultivars that are suitable for high-density indoor farms.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Plants grown under shade are exposed to low red/far-red ratio, thereby triggering an array of altered phenotypes called shade avoidance syndrome (SAS). Shade negatively influences plant growth, leading to a reduction in agricultural productivity. Understanding of SAS is crucial for sustainable agricultural practices, especially for high-density indoor farming. Brassicaceae vegetables are widely consumed around the world and are commonly cultivated in indoor farms. However, our understanding of SAS in Brassicaceae vegetables and their genome-wide transcriptional regulatory networks are still largely unexplored.
RESULTS RESULTS
Shade induced common signs of SAS, including hypocotyl elongation and reduced carotenoids/anthocyanins biosynthesis, in two different Brassicaceae species: Brassica rapa (Choy Sum and Pak Choy) and Brassica oleracea (Kai Lan). Phenotype-assisted transcriptome analysis identified a set of genes induced by shade in these species, many of which were related to auxin biosynthesis and signaling [e.g. YUCCA8 (YUC8), YUC9, and INDOLE-3-ACETIC ACID INDUCIBLE (IAAs)] and other phytohormones signaling pathways including brassinosteroids and ethylene. The genes functioning in plant defense (e.g. MYB29 and JASMONATE-ZIM-DOMAIN PROTEIN 9) as well as in biosynthesis of anthocyanins and glucosinolates were repressed upon shade. Besides, each species also exhibited distinct SAS phenotypes. Shade strongly reduced primary roots and elongated petioles of B. oleracea, Kai Lan. However, these SAS phenotypes were not clearly recognized in B. rapa, Choy Sum and Pak Choy. Some auxin signaling genes (e.g. AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR 19, IAA10, and IAA20) were specifically induced in B. oleracea, while homologs in B. rapa were not up-regulated under shade. Contrastingly, shade-exposed B. rapa vegetables triggered the ethylene signaling pathway earlier than B. oleracea, Kai Lan. Interestingly, shade induced the transcript levels of LONG HYPOCOTYL IN FAR-RED 1 (HFR1) homolog in only Pak Choy as B. rapa. As HFR1 is a key negative regulator of SAS in Arabidopsis, our finding suggests that Pak Choy HFR1 homolog may also function in conferring higher shade tolerance in this variety.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Our study shows that two Brassicaceae species not only share a conserved SAS mechanism but also exhibit distinct responses to shade, which will provide comprehensive information to develop new shade-tolerant cultivars that are suitable for high-density indoor farms.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34696740
doi: 10.1186/s12864-021-08076-1
pii: 10.1186/s12864-021-08076-1
pmc: PMC8546956
doi:

Substances chimiques

Anthocyanins 0
Arabidopsis Proteins 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

760

Informations de copyright

© 2021. The Author(s).

Références

Bioinformatics. 2012 Dec 1;28(23):3150-2
pubmed: 23060610
Food Funct. 2014 Jun;5(6):1073-81
pubmed: 24714741
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Dec 14;8:2131
pubmed: 29312389
Bioinformatics. 2014 Aug 1;30(15):2114-20
pubmed: 24695404
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Jul 12;10:914
pubmed: 31354778
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2005 Dec 1;209(2):105-13
pubmed: 15953625
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Mar 28;10:322
pubmed: 30984211
Metabolites. 2018 Dec 14;8(4):
pubmed: 30558181
EMBO J. 2009 Dec 16;28(24):3893-902
pubmed: 19851283
Cell. 2008 Apr 4;133(1):164-76
pubmed: 18394996
BMC Genomics. 2020 Feb 24;21(1):178
pubmed: 32093614
Plant Cell. 2014 May 13;26(5):1967-1980
pubmed: 24824488
Plants (Basel). 2018 Nov 17;7(4):
pubmed: 30453622
Trends Plant Sci. 2008 Nov;13(11):596-601
pubmed: 18824397
Ann Bot. 2005 Aug;96(2):169-75
pubmed: 15894550
Curr Biol. 2017 Sep 11;27(17):R931-R940
pubmed: 28898666
EMBO J. 2007 Nov 14;26(22):4756-67
pubmed: 17948056
Genes Dev. 2012 Apr 15;26(8):785-90
pubmed: 22508725
Nat Biotechnol. 2011 May 15;29(7):644-52
pubmed: 21572440
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Sep 04;8:1527
pubmed: 28928761
Breed Sci. 2014 May;64(1):48-59
pubmed: 24987290
Plant Physiol. 2013 Sep;163(1):331-53
pubmed: 23893169
Dev Cell. 2018 Jan 8;44(1):29-41.e4
pubmed: 29275991
Genetics. 1998 Mar;148(3):1295-310
pubmed: 9539443
Curr Biol. 2016 Mar 7;26(5):640-6
pubmed: 26877080
EMBO J. 2021 Jan 4;40(1):e104273
pubmed: 33264441
Plant J. 2007 May;50(3):429-38
pubmed: 17419844
Plant Cell. 2010 Jul;22(7):2370-83
pubmed: 20605855
Planta. 2019 Jul;250(1):299-318
pubmed: 31028482
Plant Cell. 2018 Jan;30(1):101-116
pubmed: 29321188
BMC Genomics. 2016 Mar 31;17:269
pubmed: 27030359
Plant J. 2004 Sep;39(5):747-60
pubmed: 15315636
BMC Bioinformatics. 2011 Aug 04;12:323
pubmed: 21816040
Plant Physiol. 2020 Dec;184(4):2137-2153
pubmed: 33051265
Plant Cell. 2019 Sep;31(9):2089-2106
pubmed: 31311834
Plant J. 2012 Sep;71(5):699-711
pubmed: 22536829
Plant Physiol. 2015 Nov;169(3):2030-47
pubmed: 26381315
PeerJ. 2016 Oct 13;4:e2574
pubmed: 27761349
Plant J. 2015 Dec;84(6):1192-205
pubmed: 26576746
Methods. 2001 Dec;25(4):402-8
pubmed: 11846609
Front Plant Sci. 2014 Aug 26;5:417
pubmed: 25206356
New Phytol. 2014 Oct;204(2):355-67
pubmed: 25103816
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2019;59(15):2411-2422
pubmed: 29557674
Nat Commun. 2017 Aug 24;8(1):348
pubmed: 28839125
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2009 Feb;12(1):49-56
pubmed: 19084466
Plant Cell. 2006 Jun;18(6):1348-59
pubmed: 16632643
Arabidopsis Book. 2012;10:e0157
pubmed: 22582029

Auteurs

Nguyen Hoai Nguyen (NH)

Temasek Life Sciences Laboratory, 1 Research Link, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117604, Singapore.

Benny Jian Rong Sng (BJR)

Temasek Life Sciences Laboratory, 1 Research Link, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117604, Singapore.
Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117543, Singapore.

Hock Chuan Yeo (HC)

Temasek Life Sciences Laboratory, 1 Research Link, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117604, Singapore.

In-Cheol Jang (IC)

Temasek Life Sciences Laboratory, 1 Research Link, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117604, Singapore. jangi@tll.org.sg.
Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117543, Singapore. jangi@tll.org.sg.

Articles similaires

Amaryllidaceae Alkaloids Lycoris NADPH-Ferrihemoprotein Reductase Gene Expression Regulation, Plant Plant Proteins
Drought Resistance Gene Expression Profiling Gene Expression Regulation, Plant Gossypium Multigene Family

Perceptions of the neighbourhood food environment and food insecurity of families with children during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Irene Carolina Sousa Justiniano, Matheus Santos Cordeiro, Hillary Nascimento Coletro et al.
1.00
Humans COVID-19 Food Insecurity Cross-Sectional Studies Female
Arabidopsis Arabidopsis Proteins Osmotic Pressure Cytoplasm RNA, Messenger

Classifications MeSH