Cleavage-Polyadenylation Factor Cft1 and SPX Domain Proteins Are Agents of Inositol Pyrophosphate Toxicosis in Fission Yeast.
SPX domain
inositol pyrophosphate
phosphate homeostasis
transcription termination
Journal
mBio
ISSN: 2150-7511
Titre abrégé: mBio
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101519231
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 02 2022
22 02 2022
Historique:
entrez:
11
1
2022
pubmed:
12
1
2022
medline:
3
3
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Inositol pyrophosphate (IPP) dynamics govern expression of the fission yeast phosphate homeostasis regulon via their effects on lncRNA-mediated transcription interference. The growth defects (ranging from sickness to lethality) elicited by fission yeast mutations that inactivate IPP pyrophosphatase enzymes are exerted via the agonistic effects of too much 1,5-IP8 on RNA 3'-processing and transcription termination. To illuminate determinants of IPP toxicosis, we conducted a genetic screen for spontaneous mutations that suppressed the sickness of Asp1 pyrophosphatase mutants. We identified a missense mutation, C823R, in the essential Cft1 subunit of the cleavage and polyadenylation factor complex that suppresses even lethal Asp1 IPP pyrophosphatase mutations, thereby fortifying the case for 3'-processing/termination as the target of IPP toxicity. The suppressor screen also identified Gde1 and Spx1 (SPAC6B12.07c), both of which have an IPP-binding SPX domain and both of which are required for lethality elicited by Asp1 mutations. A survey of other SPX proteins in the proteome identified the Vtc4 and Vtc2 subunits of the vacuolar polyphosphate polymerase as additional agents of IPP toxicosis. Gde1, Spx1, and Vtc4 contain enzymatic modules (glycerophosphodiesterase, RING finger ubiquitin ligase, and polyphosphate polymerase, respectively) fused to their IPP-sensing SPX domains. Structure-guided mutagenesis of the IPP-binding sites and the catalytic domains of Gde1 and Spx1 indicated that both modules are necessary to elicit IPP toxicity. Whereas Vtc4 polymerase catalytic activity is required for IPP toxicity, its IPP-binding site is not. Epistasis analysis, transcriptome profiling, and assays of Pho1 expression implicate Spx1 as a transducer of IP8 signaling to the 3'-processing/transcription termination machinery.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35012333
doi: 10.1128/mbio.03476-21
pmc: PMC8749416
doi:
Substances chimiques
Cft1 protein, S cerevisiae
0
Diphosphates
0
Fungal Proteins
0
Inositol Phosphates
0
Ligases
EC 6.-
mRNA Cleavage and Polyadenylation Factors
0
Polyphosphates
0
Pyrophosphatases
EC 3.6.1.-
RNA
63231-63-0
Ubiquitins
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0347621Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA008748
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R01 GM134021
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R35 GM126945
Pays : United States
Références
Yeast. 1998 Jul;14(10):943-51
pubmed: 9717240
Genome Biol. 2014;15(12):550
pubmed: 25516281
Science. 2016 May 20;352(6288):986-90
pubmed: 27080106
Curr Genet. 2015 May;61(2):175-83
pubmed: 25547512
Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 Sep 19;47(16):8452-8469
pubmed: 31276588
Nat Methods. 2012 Mar 04;9(4):357-9
pubmed: 22388286
Trends Biochem Sci. 2017 Mar;42(3):219-231
pubmed: 27876550
Science. 2009 Apr 24;324(5926):513-6
pubmed: 19390046
J Biol Chem. 2020 Feb 7;295(6):1439-1451
pubmed: 31844018
Bioinformatics. 2015 Jan 15;31(2):166-9
pubmed: 25260700
Mol Cell. 2015 Apr 2;58(1):71-82
pubmed: 25773596
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Apr 28;117(17):9356-9364
pubmed: 32303658
Methods Enzymol. 1991;194:795-823
pubmed: 2005825
J Biol Chem. 2016 Dec 9;291(50):26066-26082
pubmed: 27780866
J Cell Physiol. 2018 Mar;233(3):1897-1912
pubmed: 28542902
Nat Protoc. 2015 Jun;10(6):845-58
pubmed: 25950237
Science. 2017 Nov 24;358(6366):1056-1059
pubmed: 29074584
J Biol Chem. 2021 Jul;297(1):100891
pubmed: 34147496
Cell Rep. 2018 Mar 27;22(13):3427-3439
pubmed: 29590613
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014 Jan;1843(1):47-60
pubmed: 23747565
Microb Cell. 2016 Dec 29;4(1):6-15
pubmed: 28357384
Science. 2007 Apr 6;316(5821):109-12
pubmed: 17412959
Elife. 2019 Aug 22;8:
pubmed: 31436531
Mol Cell Biol. 2018 Apr 16;38(9):
pubmed: 29440310
ACS Chem Biol. 2017 Mar 17;12(3):648-653
pubmed: 28186404
Nucleic Acids Res. 2020 Nov 4;48(19):10739-10752
pubmed: 33010152
Eukaryot Cell. 2011 Feb;10(2):198-206
pubmed: 21169418
Cell. 1999 Nov 24;99(5):533-43
pubmed: 10589681
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007 Mar;1771(3):337-42
pubmed: 16781190
RNA. 2018 Feb;24(2):237-250
pubmed: 29122971
Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2018 Feb;49:156-162
pubmed: 28889038
PLoS Genet. 2014 Jun 19;10(6):e1004415
pubmed: 24945319
Nucleic Acids Res. 2020 Sep 4;48(15):8243-8254
pubmed: 32720681
Bioinformatics. 2011 Nov 1;27(21):2987-93
pubmed: 21903627
Sci Adv. 2021 Apr 23;7(17):
pubmed: 33893105
Fly (Austin). 2012 Apr-Jun;6(2):80-92
pubmed: 22728672
J Biol Chem. 1999 Jul 30;274(31):21735-40
pubmed: 10419486
RNA. 2021 Feb 12;:
pubmed: 33579781
J Biol Chem. 2015 Sep 18;290(38):23348-60
pubmed: 26221030
Proteins. 2008 Jul;72(1):280-8
pubmed: 18214974
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Nov 6;115(45):E10652-E10661
pubmed: 30355770
J Cell Sci. 2014 Dec 1;127(Pt 23):5093-104
pubmed: 25315834
Mol Plant. 2019 Nov 4;12(11):1463-1473
pubmed: 31419530
Nucleic Acids Res. 2020 May 21;48(9):4811-4826
pubmed: 32282918
Nat Methods. 2015 Apr;12(4):357-60
pubmed: 25751142
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Mar 18;111(11):4185-90
pubmed: 24591591
Yeast. 2005 Oct 15;22(13):1013-9
pubmed: 16200533
J Biol Chem. 2011 Sep 16;286(37):31966-74
pubmed: 21775424
Bioinformatics. 2009 Aug 15;25(16):2078-9
pubmed: 19505943
BMC Genomics. 2012 Dec 12;13:697
pubmed: 23231582
Molecules. 2020 May 08;25(9):
pubmed: 32397291
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Aug 17;118(33):
pubmed: 34389684
J Fungi (Basel). 2021 Jul 31;7(8):
pubmed: 34436165