Application of texture analysis methods for the characterization of cultured meat.


Journal

Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 03 2022
Historique:
received: 05 08 2021
accepted: 23 02 2022
entrez: 11 3 2022
pubmed: 12 3 2022
medline: 21 4 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Mechanical characterization supposes a key step in the development of cultured meat to help mimicking the sensorial properties of already existing commercial products based on traditional meat. This work presents two well stablished methods that can help studying cultured meat mechanical characteristics: texture profile analysis (double compression test) and rheology. These techniques provide data about the elastic and viscous behaviour of the samples but also values about other texture characteristics such as springiness, cohesiveness, chewiness and resilience. In this work, we present a comparison of cultured meat-based samples with commercial of the shelf common meat products (sausage, turkey and chicken breast). Results show that both Young's and Shear modulus in the cultured meat samples can be compared to commercial products in order to understand its properties. The texture characteristics for the cultured meat studied, show values within the range of commercial products. These results demonstrate the applicability of this methodology for the adjustment of mechanical properties of cultured meat products.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35273231
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07785-1
pii: 10.1038/s41598-022-07785-1
pmc: PMC8913703
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

3898

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s).

Références

Poult Sci. 2017 Jul 1;96(7):2491-2500
pubmed: 28339836
Food Res Int. 2019 Apr;118:4-12
pubmed: 30898350
J Sci Food Agric. 2014 Apr;94(6):1039-41
pubmed: 24214798
J Sci Food Agric. 2019 Apr;99(6):2708-2715
pubmed: 30350409
Annu Rev Food Sci Technol. 2014;5:373-93
pubmed: 24387605
Meat Sci. 2012 Nov;92(3):297-301
pubmed: 22543115
Meat Sci. 2014 Oct;98(2):310-5
pubmed: 24880977
Front Nutr. 2020 Mar 24;7:35
pubmed: 32266282
J Food Sci Technol. 2017 Jul;54(8):2585-2593
pubmed: 28740316
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2022;62(1):272-281
pubmed: 32951433
Meat Sci. 2005 Mar;69(3):527-36
pubmed: 22062992

Auteurs

Jacobo Paredes (J)

Tecnun-University of Navarra, Paseo Manuel Lardizábal 15, 20018, San Sebastián, Spain.
Biomedical Engineering Center, University of Navarra, Campus Universitario, 31080, Pamplona, Spain.

Diego Cortizo-Lacalle (D)

BioTech Foods S.L., Paseo de Miramón 170, Guipúzcoa, 20014, San Sebastián, Spain.

Ane Miren Imaz (AM)

Tecnun-University of Navarra, Paseo Manuel Lardizábal 15, 20018, San Sebastián, Spain.
Biomedical Engineering Center, University of Navarra, Campus Universitario, 31080, Pamplona, Spain.

Javier Aldazabal (J)

Tecnun-University of Navarra, Paseo Manuel Lardizábal 15, 20018, San Sebastián, Spain.
Biomedical Engineering Center, University of Navarra, Campus Universitario, 31080, Pamplona, Spain.

Mercedes Vila (M)

BioTech Foods S.L., Paseo de Miramón 170, Guipúzcoa, 20014, San Sebastián, Spain. mvila@biotech-foods.com.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH