Practice readiness of new graduate nurses and factors influencing practice readiness: A scoping review of reviews.

Capability Clinical competence New graduate nurses Nurse Nurse education Nursing skills Practice readiness Reality shock Transition Work environment

Journal

International journal of nursing studies
ISSN: 1873-491X
Titre abrégé: Int J Nurs Stud
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0400675

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
May 2022
Historique:
received: 12 09 2021
revised: 07 02 2022
accepted: 10 02 2022
pubmed: 29 3 2022
medline: 26 4 2022
entrez: 28 3 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

For many years there has been concern that new graduate nurses may not have been adequately prepared for the workplace, often framed in terms of whether they are work ready or practice ready and able to deal with the 'reality shock' of transitioning from student to clinician. This has prompted significant research to investigate the practice readiness of new graduate nurses. Identify what is known about the practice readiness of new graduate nurses upon commencement of employment, how practice readiness changes over their first year of employment and explore the factors which influence practice readiness. Scoping review of existing reviews guided by the framework developed by Arksey and O'Malley, with search results based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement. MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus and Web of Science were searched to identify literature reviews synthesising evidence about new graduate nurses, work readiness, practice readiness, competency and transition to practice. New graduate nurses were defined as nurses who were working in any clinical setting as a nurse within their first year of employment after graduation. Database searching was supplemented with snowball searching and limited to English language papers published between 2011 and 2020. Full-text copies of included reviews were imported into an NVivo (Version 12) database to facilitate analysis and synthesis of findings. Forty-five reviews were included. The findings indicate that transition is influenced by a wide range of intrapersonal, interpersonal and organisational factors, many of which are beyond the control of new graduate nurses. The findings also suggest that, overall, there are no major concerns about the practice readiness of new graduate nurses consistently supported by strong evidence. However, there is evidence to suggest that they 'lack confidence' during the first few months of employment. The 'receptivity' of the clinical environment to new graduate nurses appears to be a critical influence on their experience of transitioning from student to clinician and can also influence their readiness for the role of a registered nurse. Rather than focusing on the question of whether new graduate nurses are adequately prepared for the workplace, it may be time to shift the question to whether the workplace is ready to support new graduate nurses. The findings suggest two research priorities for advancing our understanding of workplace support for new graduate nurses.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
For many years there has been concern that new graduate nurses may not have been adequately prepared for the workplace, often framed in terms of whether they are work ready or practice ready and able to deal with the 'reality shock' of transitioning from student to clinician. This has prompted significant research to investigate the practice readiness of new graduate nurses.
OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
Identify what is known about the practice readiness of new graduate nurses upon commencement of employment, how practice readiness changes over their first year of employment and explore the factors which influence practice readiness.
DESIGN METHODS
Scoping review of existing reviews guided by the framework developed by Arksey and O'Malley, with search results based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement.
METHODS METHODS
MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus and Web of Science were searched to identify literature reviews synthesising evidence about new graduate nurses, work readiness, practice readiness, competency and transition to practice. New graduate nurses were defined as nurses who were working in any clinical setting as a nurse within their first year of employment after graduation. Database searching was supplemented with snowball searching and limited to English language papers published between 2011 and 2020. Full-text copies of included reviews were imported into an NVivo (Version 12) database to facilitate analysis and synthesis of findings.
RESULTS RESULTS
Forty-five reviews were included. The findings indicate that transition is influenced by a wide range of intrapersonal, interpersonal and organisational factors, many of which are beyond the control of new graduate nurses. The findings also suggest that, overall, there are no major concerns about the practice readiness of new graduate nurses consistently supported by strong evidence. However, there is evidence to suggest that they 'lack confidence' during the first few months of employment.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The 'receptivity' of the clinical environment to new graduate nurses appears to be a critical influence on their experience of transitioning from student to clinician and can also influence their readiness for the role of a registered nurse. Rather than focusing on the question of whether new graduate nurses are adequately prepared for the workplace, it may be time to shift the question to whether the workplace is ready to support new graduate nurses. The findings suggest two research priorities for advancing our understanding of workplace support for new graduate nurses.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35344839
pii: S0020-7489(22)00037-2
doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104208
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

104208

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest None.

Auteurs

Malcolm Masso (M)

Australian Health Services Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Building 234 (iC Enterprise 1), Innovation Campus, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia. Electronic address: mmasso@uow.edu.au.

Jenny Sim (J)

Australian Health Services Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Building 234 (iC Enterprise 1), Innovation Campus, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia; School of Nursing & Midwifery, University of Newcastle, NSW, Australia; School of Nursing, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia. Electronic address: Jenny.Sim@newcastle.edu.au.

Elizabeth Halcomb (E)

School of Nursing, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia. Electronic address: ehalcomb@uow.edu.au.

Cristina Thompson (C)

Australian Health Services Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Building 234 (iC Enterprise 1), Innovation Campus, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia. Electronic address: cthompso@uow.edu.au.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH