Application of Bayesian genomic prediction methods to genome-wide association analyses.
Journal
Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE
ISSN: 1297-9686
Titre abrégé: Genet Sel Evol
Pays: France
ID NLM: 9114088
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 May 2022
13 May 2022
Historique:
received:
28
01
2022
accepted:
27
04
2022
entrez:
13
5
2022
pubmed:
14
5
2022
medline:
18
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Bayesian genomic prediction methods were developed to simultaneously fit all genotyped markers to a set of available phenotypes for prediction of breeding values for quantitative traits, allowing for differences in the genetic architecture (distribution of marker effects) of traits. These methods also provide a flexible and reliable framework for genome-wide association (GWA) studies. The objective here was to review developments in Bayesian hierarchical and variable selection models for GWA analyses. By fitting all genotyped markers simultaneously, Bayesian GWA methods implicitly account for population structure and the multiple-testing problem of classical single-marker GWA. Implemented using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods, Bayesian GWA methods allow for control of error rates using probabilities obtained from posterior distributions. Power of GWA studies using Bayesian methods can be enhanced by using informative priors based on previous association studies, gene expression analyses, or functional annotation information. Applied to multiple traits, Bayesian GWA analyses can give insight into pleiotropic effects by multi-trait, structural equation, or graphical models. Bayesian methods can also be used to combine genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, and other -omics data to infer causal genotype to phenotype relationships and to suggest external interventions that can improve performance. Bayesian hierarchical and variable selection methods provide a unified and powerful framework for genomic prediction, GWA, integration of prior information, and integration of information from other -omics platforms to identify causal mutations for complex quantitative traits.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Bayesian genomic prediction methods were developed to simultaneously fit all genotyped markers to a set of available phenotypes for prediction of breeding values for quantitative traits, allowing for differences in the genetic architecture (distribution of marker effects) of traits. These methods also provide a flexible and reliable framework for genome-wide association (GWA) studies. The objective here was to review developments in Bayesian hierarchical and variable selection models for GWA analyses.
RESULTS
RESULTS
By fitting all genotyped markers simultaneously, Bayesian GWA methods implicitly account for population structure and the multiple-testing problem of classical single-marker GWA. Implemented using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods, Bayesian GWA methods allow for control of error rates using probabilities obtained from posterior distributions. Power of GWA studies using Bayesian methods can be enhanced by using informative priors based on previous association studies, gene expression analyses, or functional annotation information. Applied to multiple traits, Bayesian GWA analyses can give insight into pleiotropic effects by multi-trait, structural equation, or graphical models. Bayesian methods can also be used to combine genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, and other -omics data to infer causal genotype to phenotype relationships and to suggest external interventions that can improve performance.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Bayesian hierarchical and variable selection methods provide a unified and powerful framework for genomic prediction, GWA, integration of prior information, and integration of information from other -omics platforms to identify causal mutations for complex quantitative traits.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35562659
doi: 10.1186/s12711-022-00724-8
pii: 10.1186/s12711-022-00724-8
pmc: PMC9103490
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
31Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Genome Biol. 2020 Jul 14;21(1):173
pubmed: 32665031
Genet Sel Evol. 2021 May 26;53(1):45
pubmed: 34039266
Am J Hum Genet. 2019 Aug 1;105(2):258-266
pubmed: 31230719
J Anim Sci. 2010 Feb;88(2):544-51
pubmed: 19820059
BMC Proc. 2011 May 27;5 Suppl 3:S13
pubmed: 21624169
Science. 1996 Sep 13;273(5281):1516-7
pubmed: 8801636
Genet Sel Evol. 2010 Jan 27;42:2
pubmed: 20105297
BMC Genomics. 2016 Sep 21;17(1):744
pubmed: 27654580
PLoS Genet. 2014 Mar 27;10(3):e1004198
pubmed: 24675618
J Anim Breed Genet. 2022 Jul;139(4):380-397
pubmed: 35404478
Genet Epidemiol. 2010 Jul;34(5):455-62
pubmed: 20568276
J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2016 Feb 11;7:7
pubmed: 26870325
Anim Genet. 2012 Jul;43 Suppl 1:87-96
pubmed: 22742506
Genetics. 2015 Sep;201(1):23-9
pubmed: 26205989
Ann Appl Stat. 2016 Jun;10(2):786-811
pubmed: 33907591
BMC Bioinformatics. 2014 Jul 19;15:246
pubmed: 25038782
PLoS Genet. 2021 Apr 19;17(4):e1009455
pubmed: 33872308
Genetics. 2009 Sep;183(1):347-63
pubmed: 19620397
Genetics. 2004 Jan;166(1):611-9
pubmed: 15020448
PLoS Genet. 2006 Jul;2(7):e114
pubmed: 16848643
PLoS One. 2011 Feb 24;6(2):e14726
pubmed: 21383979
BMC Genomics. 2016 Feb 27;17:144
pubmed: 26920147
PLoS Genet. 2013;9(2):e1003264
pubmed: 23408905
Front Genet. 2014 May 20;5:134
pubmed: 24904635
Genet Sel Evol. 2018 Jun 19;50(1):32
pubmed: 29914353
Genet Sel Evol. 2009 Jan 05;41:2
pubmed: 19284681
J Dairy Sci. 2012 Jul;95(7):4114-29
pubmed: 22720968
J Anim Breed Genet. 2019 Mar;136(2):113-117
pubmed: 30614572
Anim Sci J. 2020 Jan;91(1):e13359
pubmed: 32219948
Genet Sel Evol. 2019 Jun 20;51(1):28
pubmed: 31221101
Genetics. 2013 Jul;194(3):561-72
pubmed: 23608193
Am J Hum Genet. 2020 Oct 1;107(4):714-726
pubmed: 32961112
Genet Sel Evol. 2017 Sep 21;49(1):70
pubmed: 28934948
G3 (Bethesda). 2018 Jul 2;8(7):2301-2308
pubmed: 29748199
Bioinformatics. 2018 Aug 1;34(15):2538-2545
pubmed: 29579179
Genet Sel Evol. 2019 Aug 28;51(1):47
pubmed: 31455244
Nat Genet. 2014 Feb;46(2):100-6
pubmed: 24473328
Nat Commun. 2018 Oct 4;9(1):4079
pubmed: 30287866
PLoS Genet. 2015 Apr 07;11(4):e1004969
pubmed: 25849665
Front Genet. 2020 Oct 15;11:570255
pubmed: 33193667
Genetics. 2012 Dec;192(4):1513-22
pubmed: 23086217
Genet Sel Evol. 2015 Jul 14;47:60
pubmed: 26169777
G3 (Bethesda). 2020 Dec 3;10(12):4439-4448
pubmed: 33020191
Genet Res (Camb). 2012 Apr;94(2):73-83
pubmed: 22624567
Biol Psychiatry. 2021 Jan 1;89(1):41-53
pubmed: 32736792
J Dairy Sci. 2018 Apr;101(4):3140-3154
pubmed: 29395135
BMC Genomics. 2014 Jun 06;15:442
pubmed: 24906442
Bioinformatics. 2020 Jul 1;36(13):3951-3958
pubmed: 32369552
G3 (Bethesda). 2017 Aug 7;7(8):2685-2694
pubmed: 28642364
Bioinformatics. 2018 Nov 15;34(22):3801-3808
pubmed: 30184058
J Dairy Sci. 2009 Sep;92(9):4656-63
pubmed: 19700729
Genome Med. 2021 Oct 10;13(1):157
pubmed: 34629083
J Dairy Sci. 2009 Jan;92(1):16-24
pubmed: 19109259
J Anim Sci. 2012 Jun;90(6):1733-46
pubmed: 22205662
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Oct 25;102(43):15545-50
pubmed: 16199517
Genetics. 2006 Aug;173(4):2371-81
pubmed: 16783025
Genet Sel Evol. 2018 Mar 24;50(1):10
pubmed: 29571285
Methods Mol Biol. 2013;1019:237-74
pubmed: 23756894
Genetics. 2001 Apr;157(4):1819-29
pubmed: 11290733
Genet Sel Evol. 2011 Jul 05;43:26
pubmed: 21729282
J Dairy Sci. 1991 Aug;74(8):2737-46
pubmed: 1918547
Genetics. 2013 Jul;194(3):573-96
pubmed: 23636739
J Dairy Sci. 2021 May;104(5):5705-5718
pubmed: 33663837
Genetics. 2017 Aug;206(4):1791-1806
pubmed: 28637709
Genet Sel Evol. 2017 Aug 15;49(1):62
pubmed: 28810834
Genet Sel Evol. 2014 Sep 22;46:50
pubmed: 25253441
Genetics. 2003 Dec;165(4):2259-68
pubmed: 14704201
Genetics. 2008 Mar;178(3):1709-23
pubmed: 18385116
PLoS Comput Biol. 2020 Jun 3;16(6):e1007882
pubmed: 32492067
PLoS Genet. 2013 May;9(5):e1003486
pubmed: 23671422
BMC Bioinformatics. 2011 May 23;12:186
pubmed: 21605355
Genet Sel Evol. 2021 Jun 14;53(1):49
pubmed: 34126920
PLoS Genet. 2015 May 05;11(5):e1005048
pubmed: 25942577
Genet Sel Evol. 2009 Dec 31;41:55
pubmed: 20043827
Bioinformatics. 2013 Jan 15;29(2):149-59
pubmed: 23142963
G3 (Bethesda). 2022 Mar 4;12(3):
pubmed: 35100362
Methods Mol Biol. 2013;1019:275-98
pubmed: 23756895
PLoS Genet. 2016 Nov 11;12(11):e1006423
pubmed: 27835642
Trends Genet. 2012 Jul;28(7):323-32
pubmed: 22480918
Front Genet. 2017 Jun 16;8:84
pubmed: 28670325
J Anim Sci. 2011 Apr;89(4):988-95
pubmed: 21183715
Nat Neurosci. 2019 May;22(5):691-699
pubmed: 30988527
Genetics. 2018 May;209(1):89-103
pubmed: 29514861
Genetics. 2004 Jul;167(3):1407-24
pubmed: 15280252
Nat Commun. 2021 Feb 8;12(1):860
pubmed: 33558518
Genetics. 2014 Oct;198(2):483-95
pubmed: 25009151
Ann Hum Genet. 2012 Nov;76(6):510-23
pubmed: 22971009
J Dairy Sci. 2009 Sep;92(9):4648-55
pubmed: 19700728
Genet Sel Evol. 2015 Oct 14;47:80
pubmed: 26467850
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49157
pubmed: 23152868
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform. 2019 Mar-Apr;16(2):475-489
pubmed: 29990020
Genet Sel Evol. 2016 Dec 8;48(1):96
pubmed: 27931187
Front Genet. 2018 Oct 09;9:455
pubmed: 30356716
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2022 Apr 20;14(1):e12280
pubmed: 35475137
Nat Genet. 2006 Feb;38(2):203-8
pubmed: 16380716
Front Genet. 2016 Aug 19;7:151
pubmed: 27594861
J Dairy Sci. 2009 Jun;92(6):2971-5
pubmed: 19448030
Mol Psychiatry. 2021 Oct;26(10):6065-6073
pubmed: 34381170
Genet Sel Evol. 2015 Apr 17;47:29
pubmed: 25887988