Diagnostic value of congenital pulmonary airway malformation volume ratio for fetal hydrops due to congenital lung malformations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
CVR
Congenital lung malformation
Fetal hydrops
Meta-analysis
Systematic review
Journal
Orphanet journal of rare diseases
ISSN: 1750-1172
Titre abrégé: Orphanet J Rare Dis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101266602
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 06 2022
03 06 2022
Historique:
received:
02
02
2022
accepted:
26
04
2022
entrez:
6
6
2022
pubmed:
7
6
2022
medline:
9
6
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Meta-analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic value of a CVR cut-off value of 1.6 for fetal hydrops due to congenital lung malformation (CLM). A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, VIP, and Wanfang published before 7/30/2021 for the value of a congenital pulmonary airway malformation volume ratio (CVR) cut-off value of 1.6 for the diagnosis of fetal hydrops. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the literature that met the requirements were obtained. A total of 75 articles were retrieved, and 12 articles were included for further analysis. The quality of these studies was evaluated according to the Quality Assessment for Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy tool (QUADAS-2) criteria. The Q test and heterogeneity I A total of 12 studies were included. The QUADAS-2 indicated that the risk of bias was relatively low, and the clinical applicability was relatively high. Statistical analysis was performed on included studies using a random effect model. Meta-analysis showed that the pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic ratio and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) for the diagnosis of fetal hydrops by CVR were 0.86 (95% CI, 0.72-0.93; I The sensitivity and specificity of CVR cut-off value 1.6 for the diagnosis of CLM-induced fetal hydrops were high, no publication bias was observed, and the CVR cut-off value 1.6 is meaningful for the early diagnosis prediction of CLM-induced fetal hydrops.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35658911
doi: 10.1186/s13023-022-02347-0
pii: 10.1186/s13023-022-02347-0
pmc: PMC9164472
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Review
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
213Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Onco Targets Ther. 2015 Nov 19;8:3433-9
pubmed: 26640383
Semin Pediatr Surg. 2013 Feb;22(1):24-9
pubmed: 23395142
Ultraschall Med. 2017 Apr;38(2):158-165
pubmed: 26126151
Prenat Diagn. 2016 Mar;36(3):282-9
pubmed: 26713859
Pediatr Surg Int. 2014 Jan;30(1):47-53
pubmed: 24258515
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Feb;208(2):151.e1-7
pubmed: 23159697
Fetal Diagn Ther. 2012;31(2):94-102
pubmed: 22310905
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Sep 1;1(5):309-12
pubmed: 12797034
J Pediatr Surg. 2011 Feb;46(2):292-8
pubmed: 21292076
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Nov;32(6):769-83
pubmed: 18956429
Early Hum Dev. 2011 Aug;87(8):571-5
pubmed: 21592689
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2019 Jul;104(4):F372-F377
pubmed: 30049725
J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Sep;58(9):882-93
pubmed: 16085191
Acta Paediatr. 2020 Dec;109(12):2570-2577
pubmed: 32187745
J Pediatr Surg. 2002 Mar;37(3):331-8
pubmed: 11877643
J Pediatr Surg. 2007 Jan;42(1):117-23
pubmed: 17208551
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Oct 18;155(8):529-36
pubmed: 22007046
Prenat Diagn. 1994 Aug;14(8):677-88
pubmed: 7991510
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 15;11(3):e0150474
pubmed: 26978067