Piloting a constructive feedback model for problem-based learning in medical education.
Educational model
Formative feedback
Medical students
Problem-based learning
Journal
Korean journal of medical education
ISSN: 2005-7288
Titre abrégé: Korean J Med Educ
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 101503071
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2022
Jun 2022
Historique:
received:
27
08
2021
accepted:
18
01
2022
entrez:
9
6
2022
pubmed:
10
6
2022
medline:
11
6
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Constructive feedback is key to successful teaching and learning. The unique characteristics of problem-based learning (PBL) tutorials require a unique feedback intervention. Based on the review of existing literature, we developed a feedback model for PBL tutorials, as an extension of the feedback facilitator guide of Mubuuke and his colleagues. This study was aimed to examine the perceptions of students and tutors on the feedback model that was piloted in PBL tutorials. This study employed a qualitative research design. The model was tested in nine online PBL sessions, selected using the maximum variation sampling strategy based on tutors' characteristics. All sessions were observed by the researcher. Afterwards, tutors and students in the PBL sessions were interviewed to explore their perceptions of the model. Three themes were identified based on the perceptions of the tutors and students: cognitive changes, behavioral changes, and challenges of the use of the feedback model. Both tutors and students benefited from improved cognition and behavior. However, the use of the feedback model still encountered some challenges, such as limited sources of feedback data, flexibility and adaptability of the model, content of feedback delivered, students' characteristics and performance, tutors' characteristics and self-perceptions, and supportive infrastructure. The model can be used as a reference for tutors to deliver constructive feedback during PBL tutorials. The challenges identified in using the constructive feedback model include the need for synchronized guidelines, ample time to adapt to the model, and skills training for tutors.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35676880
pii: kjme.2022.225
doi: 10.3946/kjme.2022.225
pmc: PMC9178263
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
131-143Subventions
Organisme : Universitas Indonesia
ID : NKB-2293/UN2.RST/HKP.05.00/2020
Références
Med Teach. 2019 Jun;41(6):625-631
pubmed: 29411668
J Grad Med Educ. 2012 Jun;4(2):154-8
pubmed: 23730434
BMC Med Educ. 2012 Sep 25;12:89
pubmed: 23009729
Med Educ. 2009 Sep;43(9):866-73
pubmed: 19709011
Acad Med. 2015 Dec;90(12):1698-706
pubmed: 26200584
Med Teach. 2009 Aug;31(8):685-95
pubmed: 19811204
Med Educ. 2010 Jan;44(1):101-8
pubmed: 20078761
Postgrad Med J. 2006 Sep;82(971):576-9
pubmed: 16954453
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2008 Aug;13(3):361-72
pubmed: 17124627
Acad Med. 2015 May;90(5):609-14
pubmed: 25406607
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Jan 11;16:6
pubmed: 26753932
Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2009 Jul;3(2):249-58
pubmed: 21475544
Clin Linguist Phon. 2014 Jan-Feb;28(1-2):117-30
pubmed: 23837407
Med Teach. 2017 Feb;39(2):203-211
pubmed: 27841059
J Grad Med Educ. 2019 Aug;11(4):468-471
pubmed: 31440343
Malays J Med Sci. 2018 Feb;25(1):75-83
pubmed: 29599637