Distribution of psychrophilic microorganisms in a beef slaughterhouse in Japan after cleaning.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 18 01 2022
accepted: 29 04 2022
entrez: 3 8 2022
pubmed: 4 8 2022
medline: 6 8 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The purpose of this study was to investigate the abundance and distribution of psychrophilic microorganisms associated with spoilage in beef slaughterhouse environments after cleaning. The processing lines and equipment used in slaughtering and boning were swabbed, and the microbial count was determined using a TSA and MRS medium and Chromocult® Coliform agar incubated at 15ºC and 37ºC, respectively. As a result, the brisket saw (handle side) and trolley hook were the most heavily contaminated with microorganisms, with each having a microbial adhesion rate of 66.7%. The microbial adhesion rates of the apron and milling cutter (edge side) were 50%, respectively, and those of the foot cutter (edge and handle side), splitting saw (edge side), and knife (handle side) were 33.3%, respectively. Next, four colonies were randomly isolated from the petri dish used for the bacterial count measurement to identify the predominant microbial species of the microorganisms attached to each equipment. As a result of Sanger sequencing analysis, yeasts such as Candida zeylanoides and Rhodotorula sp. and bacteria including Pseudomonas sp. and Rhodococcus sp. were identified from the equipment used in the slaughtering line, and it was assumed that these microorganisms were of environmental origin. In contrast, only Pseudomonas sp. and Candida zeylanoides were isolated from the boning line. Despite the use of cleaning operations, this study identified some equipment was contaminated with microorganisms. Since this equipment frequently comes into direct contact with the carcass, it is critical to thoroughly remove the microorganisms through accurate cleaning to prevent the spread of microbial contamination on the carcasses.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35921278
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268411
pii: PONE-D-22-01666
pmc: PMC9348744
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0268411

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Int J Food Microbiol. 2003 Sep 1;86(1-2):23-50
pubmed: 12892920
J Food Prot. 1997 Apr;60(4):367-371
pubmed: 31195532
Int J Food Microbiol. 2009 Jul 31;133(1-2):135-40
pubmed: 19505738
Microorganisms. 2015 Aug 19;3(3):428-40
pubmed: 27682098
Meat Sci. 2014 May;97(1):83-92
pubmed: 24548927
J Microbiol Methods. 2012 Mar;88(3):327-41
pubmed: 22261140
Lett Appl Microbiol. 2012 Dec;55(6):467-75
pubmed: 23020203
Food Microbiol. 2015 Dec;52:66-76
pubmed: 26338118
Food Microbiol. 2021 Dec;100:103849
pubmed: 34416953
Int J Food Microbiol. 2018 Dec 2;286:98-110
pubmed: 30056262
Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2020 Mar;19(2):311-331
pubmed: 33325162
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013 Sep;79(17):5214-23
pubmed: 23793641
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999 Jan;65(1):150-5
pubmed: 9872773
Meat Sci. 2017 Mar;125:84-94
pubmed: 27918929
Food Microbiol. 2011 Aug;28(5):1087-94
pubmed: 21569956
Int J Food Microbiol. 2015 Aug 17;207:30-9
pubmed: 25978803
J Dairy Sci. 2004 Sep;87(9):2803-12
pubmed: 15375038
Food Microbiol. 2019 Feb;77:166-172
pubmed: 30297047
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013 Oct;79(19):5864-9
pubmed: 23872571
Elife. 2015 Mar 10;4:
pubmed: 25756611
Vet Rec. 2012 Jun 2;170(22):563
pubmed: 22505244
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1984;50(3):227-48
pubmed: 6486769
Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2019 Sep;18(5):1622-1635
pubmed: 33336914
Meat Sci. 2014 Jul;97(3):288-97
pubmed: 23688797
J Food Prot. 2004 Feb;67(2):322-7
pubmed: 14968965
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2018 Dec 13;85(1):
pubmed: 30366996
BMC Microbiol. 2016 May 27;16:98
pubmed: 27234339
J Food Prot. 1993 Dec;56(12):1022-1028
pubmed: 31113117
J AOAC Int. 2002 Mar-Apr;85(2):524-31
pubmed: 11990041
Meat Sci. 2002 Nov;62(3):285-94
pubmed: 22061605
J Food Prot. 2000 Dec;63(12):1670-5
pubmed: 11131889

Auteurs

Ayaka Nakamura (A)

Department of Food Science and Technology, Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology, Tokyo, Japan.

Hajime Takahashi (H)

Department of Food Science and Technology, Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology, Tokyo, Japan.

Anrin Kondo (A)

Department of Food Science and Technology, Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology, Tokyo, Japan.

Fumiaki Koike (F)

Hida Meat Agricultural Cooperative Association, Takayama City, Gifu, Japan.

Takashi Kuda (T)

Department of Food Science and Technology, Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology, Tokyo, Japan.

Bon Kimura (B)

Department of Food Science and Technology, Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology, Tokyo, Japan.

Mitsushi Kobayashi (M)

Hida Meat Agricultural Cooperative Association, Takayama City, Gifu, Japan.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH