Absolute binding free energy calculations improve enrichment of actives in virtual compound screening.


Journal

Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 08 2022
Historique:
received: 10 05 2022
accepted: 26 07 2022
entrez: 10 8 2022
pubmed: 11 8 2022
medline: 13 8 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

We determined the effectiveness of absolute binding free energy (ABFE) calculations to refine the selection of active compounds in virtual compound screening, a setting where the more commonly used relative binding free energy approach is not readily applicable. To do this, we conducted baseline docking calculations of structurally diverse compounds in the DUD-E database for three targets, BACE1, CDK2 and thrombin, followed by ABFE calculations for compounds with high docking scores. The docking calculations alone achieved solid enrichment of active compounds over decoys. Encouragingly, the ABFE calculations then improved on this baseline. Analysis of the results emphasizes the importance of establishing high quality ligand poses as starting points for ABFE calculations, a nontrivial goal when processing a library of diverse compounds without informative co-crystal structures. Overall, our results suggest that ABFE calculations can play a valuable role in the drug discovery process.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35948614
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17480-w
pii: 10.1038/s41598-022-17480-w
pmc: PMC9365818
doi:

Substances chimiques

Ligands 0
Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases EC 3.4.-
Aspartic Acid Endopeptidases EC 3.4.23.-

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

13640

Subventions

Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R01GM061300
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s).

Références

J Comput Chem. 2004 Jul 15;25(9):1157-74
pubmed: 15116359
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2013 Mar;27(3):221-34
pubmed: 23579614
Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2012 Apr 1;22(7):2444-9
pubmed: 22390835
J Chem Theory Comput. 2015 Apr 14;11(4):1864-74
pubmed: 26574392
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2022 Mar;36(3):193-203
pubmed: 35262811
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2010 Mar;9(3):203-14
pubmed: 20168317
ACS Omega. 2016 Sep 30;1(3):435-447
pubmed: 27713931
J Comput Chem. 2002 Dec;23(16):1623-41
pubmed: 12395429
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 13;11(1):1116
pubmed: 33441879
J Phys Chem B. 2014 Feb 20;118(7):1813-24
pubmed: 24479628
J Am Chem Soc. 2015 Feb 25;137(7):2695-703
pubmed: 25625324
J Chem Inf Model. 2021 Jun 28;61(6):2720-2732
pubmed: 34086476
J Phys Chem Lett. 2014 Jun 5;5(11):1885-91
pubmed: 26273869
J Med Chem. 2019 Nov 14;62(21):9753-9771
pubmed: 31633354
RSC Adv. 2020 Jan 3;10(2):790-800
pubmed: 35494470
J Chem Theory Comput. 2022 Apr 12;18(4):2616-2630
pubmed: 35266690
Living J Comput Mol Sci. 2020;2(1):
pubmed: 34458687
J Chem Phys. 2020 Jun 28;152(24):244116
pubmed: 32610969
J Med Chem. 2010 Feb 25;53(4):1662-72
pubmed: 20121196
J Med Chem. 2012 Jul 26;55(14):6582-94
pubmed: 22716043
Nucleic Acids Res. 2000 Jan 1;28(1):235-42
pubmed: 10592235
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2021 Apr 14;23(14):8525-8540
pubmed: 33876015
Biopolymers. 1992 May;32(5):523-35
pubmed: 1515543
J Comput Chem. 2013 Oct 15;34(27):2360-71
pubmed: 24038118
J Chem Inf Model. 2020 Nov 23;60(11):5457-5474
pubmed: 32813975
J Chem Inf Model. 2020 Sep 28;60(9):4153-4169
pubmed: 32539386
J Chem Theory Comput. 2018 Jul 10;14(7):3621-3632
pubmed: 29874074
Chem Sci. 2016 Jan 14;7(1):207-218
pubmed: 26798447
J Chem Theory Comput. 2017 Nov 14;13(11):5697-5708
pubmed: 28898077
J Phys Chem B. 2015 Apr 23;119(16):5113-23
pubmed: 25764013
Radiology. 1982 Apr;143(1):29-36
pubmed: 7063747
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2013 Sep;27(9):755-70
pubmed: 24072356
Curr Drug Targets. 2017;18(9):1104-1111
pubmed: 27848884
Future Med Chem. 2012 Apr;4(5):593-602
pubmed: 22458679
Chem Sci. 2021 Sep 24;12(41):13958-13971
pubmed: 34760182
J Am Chem Soc. 2017 Jan 18;139(2):946-957
pubmed: 28009512
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 May 10;102(19):6825-30
pubmed: 15867154
J Chem Theory Comput. 2015 Sep 8;11(9):4377-94
pubmed: 26523125
J Chem Theory Comput. 2021 Dec 14;17(12):7366-7372
pubmed: 34762421
Int J Mol Sci. 2010 Aug 18;11(8):3016-34
pubmed: 21152288
J Chem Phys. 2008 Sep 28;129(12):124105
pubmed: 19045004
J Chem Inf Model. 2016 Sep 26;56(9):1856-71
pubmed: 27500414
J Chem Inf Model. 2020 Dec 28;60(12):6211-6227
pubmed: 33119284
Methods Mol Biol. 2018;1762:199-232
pubmed: 29594774
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2016 Sep;30(9):743-751
pubmed: 27562018
Molecules. 2020 Jan 09;25(2):
pubmed: 31936488
Biophys J. 1997 Mar;72(3):1047-69
pubmed: 9138555
J Chem Theory Comput. 2021 Jun 8;17(6):3309-3319
pubmed: 33983730
J Chem Theory Comput. 2017 Mar 14;13(3):1439-1453
pubmed: 28103438
J Med Chem. 2006 Oct 5;49(20):5912-31
pubmed: 17004707

Auteurs

Mudong Feng (M)

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, and Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.

Germano Heinzelmann (G)

Departamento de Física, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil.

Michael K Gilson (MK)

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, and Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA. mgilson@health.ucsd.edu.

Articles similaires

Animals Hemiptera Insect Proteins Phylogeny Insecticides

Conservation of the cooling agent binding pocket within the TRPM subfamily.

Kate Huffer, Matthew C S Denley, Elisabeth V Oskoui et al.
1.00
TRPM Cation Channels Animals Binding Sites Mice Pyrimidinones
Fucosyltransferases Drug Repositioning Molecular Docking Simulation Molecular Dynamics Simulation Humans
Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1 Ligands Molecular Dynamics Simulation Protein Binding Thermodynamics

Classifications MeSH