The evolving role of liquid biopsy in lung cancer.
Biomarkers
Liquid biopsy
NSCLC
ctDNA
Journal
Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
ISSN: 1872-8332
Titre abrégé: Lung Cancer
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 8800805
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2022
10 2022
Historique:
received:
17
07
2022
revised:
22
07
2022
accepted:
05
08
2022
pubmed:
24
8
2022
medline:
21
9
2022
entrez:
23
8
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Liquid biopsy has revolutionized the management of cancer patients. In particular, liquid biopsy-based testing has proven to be highly beneficial for identifying actionable cancer markers, especially when solid tissue biopsies are insufficient or unattainable. Beyond the predictive role, liquid biopsy may be a useful tool for comprehensive tumor genotyping, identification of emergent resistance mechanisms, monitoring of minimal residual disease, early detection, and cancer interception. The application of next generation sequencing to liquid biopsy has led to the "quantum leap" of predictive molecular pathology. Here, we review the evolving role of liquid biopsy in lung cancer.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35998482
pii: S0169-5002(22)00580-3
doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.08.004
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers, Tumor
0
Circulating Tumor DNA
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
53-64Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Umberto Malapelle has received personal fees (as consultant and/or speaker bureau) from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, MSD, Amgen, Thermo Fisher Scientifics, Eli Lilly, Diaceutics, GSK, Merck and AstraZeneca, Janssen, Diatech, Novartis and Hedera unrelated to the current work. Pasquale Pisapia has received personal fees as speaker bureau from Novartis, for work performed outside of the current study. Alessandro Russo reports advisory board role/consultancy for AstraZeneca, Novartis, Pfizer and MSD, unrelated to the current work. Christian Rolfo reports grants from Pfizer and MSD, consulting fees from Archer, Inivata, BMS, Novartis, Boston Pharmaceuticals, MD Serono; other from AstraZeneca, Roche, GuardantHealth, and MSD; safety monitoring board for MD Serono; leadership roles with ISLB, IASLC, ESO and ESMO; other support from GuardantHealth, unrelated to the current work. Giancarlo Troncone reports personal fees (as speaker bureau or advisor) from Roche, MSD, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, BMS, GSK, Menarini, AstraZeneca, Amgen and Bayer, unrelated to the current work. The other Authors have nothing to disclose.