A Large-Scale Prospective Concordance Study of Plasma- and Tissue-Based Next-Generation Targeted Sequencing for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (LC-SCRUM-Liquid).
Humans
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
/ pathology
Lung Neoplasms
/ pathology
Genotype
Prospective Studies
Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf
/ genetics
Protein-Tyrosine Kinases
/ genetics
Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)
/ genetics
Proto-Oncogene Proteins
/ genetics
Liquid Biopsy
Cell-Free Nucleic Acids
/ genetics
Mutation
High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
ErbB Receptors
/ genetics
Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases
/ genetics
Journal
Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research
ISSN: 1557-3265
Titre abrégé: Clin Cancer Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9502500
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 04 2023
14 04 2023
Historique:
received:
15
06
2022
revised:
18
08
2022
accepted:
03
10
2022
medline:
17
4
2023
pubmed:
7
10
2022
entrez:
6
10
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We evaluated plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and tissue-based sequencing concordance for comprehensive oncogenic driver detection in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using a large-scale prospective screening cohort (LC-SCRUM-Liquid). Blood samples were prospectively collected within 4 weeks of corresponding tumor tissue sampling from patients with advanced NSCLC to investigate plasma cfDNA sequencing concordance for alterations in 8 oncogenes (EGFR, KRAS, BRAF, HER2, MET, ALK, RET, and ROS1) compared with tissue-based next-generation targeted sequencing. Paired blood and tissue samples were obtained in 1,062/1,112 enrolled patients with NSCLC. Oncogenic alteration was detected by plasma cfDNA sequencing and tissue assay in 455 (42.8%) and 537 (50.5%) patients, respectively. The positive percent agreement of plasma cfDNA sequencing compared with tissue DNA and RNA assays were 77% (EGFR, 78%; KRAS, 75%; BRAF, 85%; HER2, 72%) and 47% (ALK, 46%; RET, 57%; ROS1, 18%; MET, 66%), respectively. Oncogenic drivers were positive for plasma cfDNA and negative for tissue due to unsuccessful genomic analysis from poor-quality tissue samples (70%), and were negative for plasma cfDNA and positive for tissue due to low sensitivity of cfDNA analysis (61%). In patients with positive oncogenic drivers by plasma cfDNA sequencing but negative by tissue assay, the response rate of genotype-matched therapy was 85% and median progression-free survival was 12.7 months. Plasma cfDNA sequencing in patients with advanced NSCLC showed relatively high sensitivity for detecting gene mutations but low sensitivity for gene fusions and MET exon 14 skipping. This may be an alternative only when tissue assay is unavailable due to insufficient DNA and RNA. See related commentary by Jacobsen Skanderup et al., p. 1381.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36201167
pii: 709652
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-1749
doi:
Substances chimiques
Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf
EC 2.7.11.1
Protein-Tyrosine Kinases
EC 2.7.10.1
Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)
EC 3.6.5.2
Proto-Oncogene Proteins
0
Cell-Free Nucleic Acids
0
ErbB Receptors
EC 2.7.10.1
Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases
EC 2.7.10.1
Types de publication
Editorial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Comment
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1506-1514Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentOn
Informations de copyright
©2022 American Association for Cancer Research.