Comparison of global DNA methylation analysis by whole genome bisulfite sequencing and the Infinium Mouse Methylation BeadChip using fresh and fresh-frozen mouse epidermis.
CpG methylation
DNA methylation
Infinium Mouse Methylation BeadChip
Whole genome bisulphite sequencing
epidermis
hairless mice
Journal
Epigenetics
ISSN: 1559-2308
Titre abrégé: Epigenetics
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101265293
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2023
Dec 2023
Historique:
pubmed:
15
11
2022
medline:
3
3
2023
entrez:
14
11
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Until recently, studying the murine methylome was restricted to sequencing-based methods. In this study we compared the global DNA methylation levels of hairless mouse epidermis using the recently released Infinium Mouse Methylation BeadChip from Illumina and whole genome bisulphite sequencing (WGBS). We also studied the effect of sample storage conditions by using fresh and fresh-frozen epidermis. The DNA methylation levels of 123,851 CpG sites covered by both the BeadChip and WGBS were compared. DNA methylation levels obtained with WGBS and the BeadChip were strongly correlated (Pearson correlation r = 0.984). We applied a threshold of 15 reads for the WGBS methylation analysis. Even at a threshold of 10 reads, we observed no substantial difference in DNA methylation levels compared with that obtained with the BeadChip. The DNA methylation levels from the fresh and the fresh-frozen samples were strongly correlated when analysed with both the BeadChip (r = 0.999) and WGBS (r = 0.994). We conclude that the two methods of analysis generally work equally well for studies of DNA methylation of mouse epidermis and find that fresh and fresh-frozen epidermis can generally be used equally well. The choice of method will depend on the specific study's aims and the available resources in the laboratory.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36373380
doi: 10.1080/15592294.2022.2144574
pmc: PMC9980693
doi:
Substances chimiques
hydrogen sulfite
OJ9787WBLU
Sulfites
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2144574Références
Epidemiology. 2010 Nov;21(6):819-28
pubmed: 20805753
Epigenetics. 2020 Jan - Feb;15(1-2):174-182
pubmed: 31538540
Sci Rep. 2015 Oct 20;5:15375
pubmed: 26482909
Mol Oncol. 2007 Jun;1(1):26-41
pubmed: 19383285
Cell Genom. 2022 Jul 13;2(7):
pubmed: 35873672
Epigenetics. 2022 Dec;17(12):1636-1645
pubmed: 35356867
Epigenetics. 2022 Dec;17(12):1677-1685
pubmed: 35297293
Nat Rev Genet. 2012 Oct;13(10):705-19
pubmed: 22986265
Genome Biol. 2013;14(10):R115
pubmed: 24138928
PLoS One. 2010 Mar 15;5(3):e9692
pubmed: 20300621
BMC Genomics. 2010 Jun 02;11:349
pubmed: 20525181
Clin Epigenetics. 2017 Apr 4;9:33
pubmed: 28392843
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Mar 1;89(5):1827-31
pubmed: 1542678
Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 Nov 16;46(20):e123
pubmed: 30085201
Lab Invest. 2015 Jul;95(7):833-42
pubmed: 25867767
Genome Biol. 2016 Oct 7;17(1):208
pubmed: 27717381
Epigenetics Chromatin. 2020 Nov 23;13(1):51
pubmed: 33228774
Genomics. 2011 Oct;98(4):288-95
pubmed: 21839163
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013 Jan;38(1):23-38
pubmed: 22781841
Oncotarget. 2017 Jul 18;8(29):48126-48137
pubmed: 28611295
Bioinformatics. 2011 Jun 1;27(11):1571-2
pubmed: 21493656
Epigenetics. 2021 Jun-Jul;16(7):754-769
pubmed: 33048617
Adv Genet. 2010;70:27-56
pubmed: 20920744
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2014 Nov;13:147-53
pubmed: 25128690