A Wolf in Sheep's Clothing: Reuse of Routinely Obtained Laboratory Data in Research.
analysis
applied data science
clinical
clinical care
data
decision
decision support
electronic health records
laboratory
laboratory data
patient
preprocessing
research
value
Journal
Journal of medical Internet research
ISSN: 1438-8871
Titre abrégé: J Med Internet Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 100959882
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 11 2022
18 11 2022
Historique:
received:
24
06
2022
accepted:
13
10
2022
revised:
19
09
2022
entrez:
18
11
2022
pubmed:
19
11
2022
medline:
23
11
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Electronic health records (EHRs) contain valuable data for reuse in science, quality evaluations, and clinical decision support. Because routinely obtained laboratory data are abundantly present, often numeric, generated by certified laboratories, and stored in a structured way, one may assume that they are immediately fit for (re)use in research. However, behind each test result lies an extensive context of choices and considerations, made by both humans and machines, that introduces hidden patterns in the data. If they are unaware, researchers reusing routine laboratory data may eventually draw incorrect conclusions. In this paper, after discussing health care system characteristics on both the macro and micro level, we introduce the reader to hidden aspects of generating structured routine laboratory data in 4 steps (ordering, preanalysis, analysis, and postanalysis) and explain how each of these steps may interfere with the reuse of routine laboratory data. As researchers reusing these data, we underline the importance of domain knowledge of the health care professional, laboratory specialist, data manager, and patient to turn routine laboratory data into meaningful data sets to help obtain relevant insights that create value for clinical care.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36399373
pii: v24i11e40516
doi: 10.2196/40516
pmc: PMC9719056
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e40516Informations de copyright
©L Malin Overmars, Michael S A Niemantsverdriet, T Katrien J Groenhof, Mark C H De Groot, Cornelia A R Hulsbergen-Veelken, Wouter W Van Solinge, Ruben E A Musson, Maarten J Ten Berg, Imo E Hoefer, Saskia Haitjema. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 18.11.2022.
Références
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Mar 19;21(3):e11732
pubmed: 30888324
Clin Chem. 1972 Jun;18(6):499-502
pubmed: 4337382
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Oct 22;74(16):2032-2043
pubmed: 31623760
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Apr 05;21(4):e12286
pubmed: 30950797
Clin Chem. 2021 Jul 6;67(7):1032-1034
pubmed: 34104943
JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Aug 21;7(8):e10473
pubmed: 30131316
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 10;12(1):e0169593
pubmed: 28072822
Yearb Med Inform. 2017 Aug;26(1):38-52
pubmed: 28480475
Diagn Progn Res. 2020 Jul 2;4:8
pubmed: 32699824
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2007;45(1):13-9
pubmed: 17243908
BMJ. 2018 Apr 30;361:k1479
pubmed: 29712648
N Engl J Med. 2007 Jun 14;356(24):2527-34
pubmed: 17568035
Yearb Med Inform. 2018 Aug;27(1):129-139
pubmed: 30157516
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2018 Sep 25;56(10):1579-1586
pubmed: 29095697