Dependence of apparent diffusion coefficient on slice position in magnetic resonance diffusion imaging.


Journal

Magnetic resonance imaging
ISSN: 1873-5894
Titre abrégé: Magn Reson Imaging
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8214883

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2023
Historique:
received: 19 06 2022
revised: 11 01 2023
accepted: 11 01 2023
pubmed: 23 1 2023
medline: 8 3 2023
entrez: 22 1 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The position dependence of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) by echo-planar imaging (EPI)- and turbo spin echo (TSE)-diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) was assessed using phantoms. Six pure water-filled containers were placed parallel to the direction of the static magnetic field from the center of the magnetic field to the foot direction (five containers) and the head direction (one container). Six slice positions were set, and a cross-section image was scanned at the center of each container using a 1.5-T MRI scanner. Diffusion times for both EPI- and TSE-DWI were matched as much as possible. The slice thickness was adjusted to match the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at the center of the magnetic field for both sequences. A B ADC decreased significantly with distance from the center of the magnetic field for both EPI-DWI and TSE-DWI (P < 0.05). TSE-ADC was significantly higher than EPI-ADC for all combinations (P < 0.01). Based on the Friedman test, the SNR of EPI- and TSE-DWI was significantly different and depended on the slice position (P < 0.01). The Pearson correlation coefficient between ADC and SNR was 0.78 in EPI-DWI and 0.60 in TSE-DWI, whereas that between ADC and FA was 0.97 in EPI-DWI and 0.94 in TSE-DWI. The FA decreased by 0.048 and 0.047° per mm from the center of the magnetic field to head and foot directions, respectively. ADC depends on the slice position and decreases with an increase in distance from the magnetic field center. Caution should be taken when comparing and quantitatively evaluating the ADC at sites shifted in the long-axis direction.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36682397
pii: S0730-725X(23)00009-7
doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2023.01.009
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

41-47

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Yasuo Takatsu (Y)

Molecular Imaging, School of Medical Sciences, Fujita Health University, 1-98, Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi 470-1192, Japan; Division of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, 5-11-80 Kodatsuno, Kanazawa, Ishikawa 920-0942, Japan. Electronic address: yasuo.takatsu@fujita-hu.ac.jp.

Masafumi Nakamura (M)

Division of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, 5-11-80 Kodatsuno, Kanazawa, Ishikawa 920-0942, Japan; Department of Radiology, Otsu City Hospital, 2-9-9, Motomiya, Otsu-City, Shiga 520-0804, Japan. Electronic address: nakamura-xx@leto.eonet.ne.jp.

Yuichi Suzuki (Y)

Department of Radiology, The University of Tokyo Hospital, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan.

Tosiaki Miyati (T)

Division of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, 5-11-80 Kodatsuno, Kanazawa, Ishikawa 920-0942, Japan. Electronic address: ramiyati@mhs.mp.kanazawa-u.ac.jp.

Articles similaires

Humans Ketamine Propofol Pulmonary Atelectasis Female
Humans Magnetic Resonance Imaging Phantoms, Imaging Infant, Newborn Signal-To-Noise Ratio
Humans Middle Aged Female Male Surveys and Questionnaires

Classifications MeSH