Clinical utility of circulating tumor DNA sequencing with a large panel: a National Center for Precision Medicine (PRISM) study.


Journal

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology
ISSN: 1569-8041
Titre abrégé: Ann Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9007735

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 2023
Historique:
received: 31 10 2022
revised: 10 12 2022
accepted: 17 01 2023
medline: 18 4 2023
pubmed: 29 1 2023
entrez: 28 1 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) sequencing is a promising approach for tailoring therapy in patients with cancer. We report hereby the results from a prospective study where we investigated the impact of comprehensive molecular profiling of ctDNA in patients with advanced solid tumors. Genomic analysis was performed using the FoundationOne Liquid CDx Assay [324 genes, tumor mutational burden (TMB), microsatellite instability status]. Each individual genomic report was reviewed and discussed weekly by a multidisciplinary tumor board (MTB). Actionable targets were classified by ESMO Scale for Clinical Actionability of Molecular Targets (ESCAT) tier leading to molecular-based treatment suggestions wherever it was possible. Between December 2020 and November 2021, 1772 patients with metastatic solid tumors underwent molecular profiling. Median time to assay results was 12 days. Results were contributive for 1658 patients (94%). At least one actionable target was detected in 1059 patients (64%) with a total of 1825 actionable alterations including alteration of the DNA damage repair response pathway (n = 336, 18%), high TMB (>16 mutations/Mb; n = 243, 13%), PIK3CA mutations (n = 150, 8%), ERBB family pathway alterations (n = 127, 7%), PTEN alterations (n = 95, 5%), FGFR alterations (n = 67, 4%) and MET activations (n = 13, 0.7%). The MTB recommended a matched therapy for 597 patients (56%) with a total of 819 therapeutic orientations: clinical trials (n = 639, 78%), off-label/compassionate use (n = 81, 10%), approved drug (n = 51, 6%), and early access program (n = 48, 6%). In total, 122 patients (21%) were treated. Among the assessable patients (n = 107), 4 (4%) had complete response, 35 (33%) had partial response, 27 (25%) had stable disease, and 41 (38%) a progressive disease as best response. The median progression-free survival and median overall survival were 4.7 months (95% confidence interval 2.7-6.7 months) and 8.3 months (95% confidence interval 4.7-11.9 months) respectively. ctDNA sequencing with a large panel is an efficient approach to match patients with advanced cancer with targeted therapies.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) sequencing is a promising approach for tailoring therapy in patients with cancer. We report hereby the results from a prospective study where we investigated the impact of comprehensive molecular profiling of ctDNA in patients with advanced solid tumors.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Genomic analysis was performed using the FoundationOne Liquid CDx Assay [324 genes, tumor mutational burden (TMB), microsatellite instability status]. Each individual genomic report was reviewed and discussed weekly by a multidisciplinary tumor board (MTB). Actionable targets were classified by ESMO Scale for Clinical Actionability of Molecular Targets (ESCAT) tier leading to molecular-based treatment suggestions wherever it was possible.
RESULTS
Between December 2020 and November 2021, 1772 patients with metastatic solid tumors underwent molecular profiling. Median time to assay results was 12 days. Results were contributive for 1658 patients (94%). At least one actionable target was detected in 1059 patients (64%) with a total of 1825 actionable alterations including alteration of the DNA damage repair response pathway (n = 336, 18%), high TMB (>16 mutations/Mb; n = 243, 13%), PIK3CA mutations (n = 150, 8%), ERBB family pathway alterations (n = 127, 7%), PTEN alterations (n = 95, 5%), FGFR alterations (n = 67, 4%) and MET activations (n = 13, 0.7%). The MTB recommended a matched therapy for 597 patients (56%) with a total of 819 therapeutic orientations: clinical trials (n = 639, 78%), off-label/compassionate use (n = 81, 10%), approved drug (n = 51, 6%), and early access program (n = 48, 6%). In total, 122 patients (21%) were treated. Among the assessable patients (n = 107), 4 (4%) had complete response, 35 (33%) had partial response, 27 (25%) had stable disease, and 41 (38%) a progressive disease as best response. The median progression-free survival and median overall survival were 4.7 months (95% confidence interval 2.7-6.7 months) and 8.3 months (95% confidence interval 4.7-11.9 months) respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
ctDNA sequencing with a large panel is an efficient approach to match patients with advanced cancer with targeted therapies.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36709039
pii: S0923-7534(23)00046-7
doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.01.008
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Circulating Tumor DNA 0
DNA, Neoplasm 0
Biomarkers, Tumor 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

389-396

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 European Society for Medical Oncology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

A Bayle (A)

Drug Development Department (DITEP) Gustave Roussy - Cancer Campus, Villejuif; Université Paris-Saclay, Faculté de médecine, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, Paris; Oncostat U1018, Inserm, Paris-Saclay University, labeled Ligue Contre le Cancer, Villejuif, France.

L Belcaid (L)

Drug Development Department (DITEP) Gustave Roussy - Cancer Campus, Villejuif; Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

M Aldea (M)

Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif.

D Vasseur (D)

Department of Medical Biology and Pathology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif.

F Peyraud (F)

Department of Early Phase Trial Unit, Institut Bergonié Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Bordeaux.

C Nicotra (C)

Drug Development Department (DITEP) Gustave Roussy - Cancer Campus, Villejuif.

A Geraud (A)

Drug Development Department (DITEP) Gustave Roussy - Cancer Campus, Villejuif.

M Sakkal (M)

Drug Development Department (DITEP) Gustave Roussy - Cancer Campus, Villejuif; Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif.

L Seknazi (L)

Drug Development Department (DITEP) Gustave Roussy - Cancer Campus, Villejuif.

L Cerbone (L)

Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif.

F Blanc-Durand (F)

Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif.

J Hadoux (J)

Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif.

F Mosele (F)

Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif.

M Tagliamento (M)

Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif.

A Bernard-Tessier (A)

Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif.

B Verret (B)

Université Paris-Saclay, Faculté de médecine, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, Paris; Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif.

C Smolenschi (C)

Drug Development Department (DITEP) Gustave Roussy - Cancer Campus, Villejuif.

R Clodion (R)

Drug Development Department (DITEP) Gustave Roussy - Cancer Campus, Villejuif.

N Auger (N)

Department of Medical Biology and Pathology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif.

P M Romano (PM)

Drug Development Department (DITEP) Gustave Roussy - Cancer Campus, Villejuif.

A Gazzah (A)

Drug Development Department (DITEP) Gustave Roussy - Cancer Campus, Villejuif.

M N Camus (MN)

Drug Development Department (DITEP) Gustave Roussy - Cancer Campus, Villejuif.

J Micol (J)

Department of Hematology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif.

O Caron (O)

Department of Genetics, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif.

A Hollebecque (A)

Drug Development Department (DITEP) Gustave Roussy - Cancer Campus, Villejuif.

Y Loriot (Y)

Drug Development Department (DITEP) Gustave Roussy - Cancer Campus, Villejuif.

B Besse (B)

Université Paris-Saclay, Faculté de médecine, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, Paris; Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif.

L Lacroix (L)

Department of Medical Biology and Pathology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif.

E Rouleau (E)

Department of Medical Biology and Pathology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif.

S Ponce (S)

Drug Development Department (DITEP) Gustave Roussy - Cancer Campus, Villejuif.

J C Soria (JC)

Université Paris-Saclay, Faculté de médecine, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, Paris; Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif.

F Barlesi (F)

Université Paris-Saclay, Faculté de médecine, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, Paris; Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif.

F Andre (F)

Université Paris-Saclay, Faculté de médecine, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, Paris; Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif.

A Italiano (A)

Drug Development Department (DITEP) Gustave Roussy - Cancer Campus, Villejuif; Department of Early Phase Trial Unit, Institut Bergonié Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Bordeaux; Faculty of Medicine, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France. Electronic address: Antoine.italiano@gustaveroussy.fr.

Articles similaires

Genome, Chloroplast Phylogeny Genetic Markers Base Composition High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C

Classifications MeSH