Effectiveness of Lay Bystander Hands-Only Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation on a Mattress versus the Floor: A Randomized Cross-Over Trial.
Journal
Annals of emergency medicine
ISSN: 1097-6760
Titre abrégé: Ann Emerg Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8002646
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2023
06 2023
Historique:
received:
08
11
2022
revised:
12
01
2023
accepted:
13
01
2023
pmc-release:
01
06
2024
medline:
22
5
2023
pubmed:
26
2
2023
entrez:
25
2
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation increases the likelihood of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival by more than two-fold. A common barrier to the prompt initiation of compressions is moving victims to the floor, but compression quality on a "floor" versus a "mattress" has not been tested among lay bystanders. We conducted a prospective, randomized, cross-over trial comparing lay bystander compression quality using a manikin on a bed versus the floor. Participants included adults without professional health care training. We randomized participants to the order of manikin placement, either on a mattress or on the floor. For both, participants were instructed to perform 2 minutes of chest compressions on a cardiopulmonary resuscitation Simon manikin Gaumard (Gaumard Scientific, Miami, FL). The primary outcome was mean compression depth (cm) over 2 minutes. We fit a linear regression model adjusted for scenario order, age, sex, and body mass index with robust standard errors to account for repeated measures and reported mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Our sample of 80 adults was 66% female with a mean age of 50.5 years (SD 18.2). The mean compression depth on the mattress was 2.9 cm (SD 2.3) and 3.5 cm (SD 2.2) on the floor, a mean difference of 0.58 cm (95% CI 0.18, 0.98). Compression depth fell below the 5 to 6 cm depth recommended by the American Heart Association on both surfaces. In the adjusted model, the mean depth was greater when the manikin was on the floor than the mattress (adjusted mean difference 0.62 cm; 95% CI 0.23 to 1.01), and mean depth was less for females than males (adjusted mean difference -1.42 cm, 95% CI -2.59, -0.25). In addition, the difference in compression depth was larger for female participants (mean difference 0.94 cm; 95% CI 0.54, 1.34) than for male participants (mean difference -0.01 cm; 95% CI -0.80, 0.78), and the interaction was statistically significant (P = .04). The mean compression depth was significantly smaller on the mattress and with female bystanders. Further research is needed to understand the benefit of moving out-of-hospital cardiac arrest victims to the floor relative to the detrimental effect of delaying chest compressions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36841661
pii: S0196-0644(23)00026-4
doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2023.01.012
pmc: PMC10599351
mid: NIHMS1935636
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
691-698Subventions
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : K12 HL138039
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : T32 HL007853
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
Circulation. 2020 Oct 20;142(16_suppl_2):S366-S468
pubmed: 33081529
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015 May;8(3):277-84
pubmed: 25925373
Resuscitation. 2006 Nov;71(2):137-45
pubmed: 16982127
Circulation. 2014 Nov 25;130(22):1962-70
pubmed: 25252721
Cardiovasc Eng. 2007 Jun;7(2):47-50
pubmed: 17510795
Emerg Med Australas. 2012 Aug;24(4):369-73
pubmed: 22862753
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 23;10(9):e037676
pubmed: 32967879
Acta Clin Belg. 2021 Dec;76(6):427-432
pubmed: 32306856
Open Access Emerg Med. 2020 Sep 07;12:193-200
pubmed: 32982493
Crit Care Med. 2012 Apr;40(4):1192-8
pubmed: 22202708
Circulation. 2020 Oct 20;142(16_suppl_1):S41-S91
pubmed: 33084391
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2021 Dec;8(4):255-267
pubmed: 35000353
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009 Oct;53(9):1131-7
pubmed: 19388894
Circulation. 2020 Mar 24;141(12):e686-e700
pubmed: 32088981
Intensive Care Med. 2006 Oct;32(10):1632-5
pubmed: 16826385
Resuscitation. 2016 Aug;105:149-55
pubmed: 27288652
Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2020 Apr;17(2):e12314
pubmed: 31957258
Resuscitation. 2017 Nov;120:63-70
pubmed: 28903056
Resuscitation. 2018 Jul;128:138-143
pubmed: 29753856
Intensive Care Med. 2003 Dec;29(12):2330-2335
pubmed: 14504728
Ann Emerg Med. 1993 Nov;22(11):1652-8
pubmed: 8214853
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 13;14(2):e0211792
pubmed: 30759140
Resuscitation. 2018 Jul;128:88-92
pubmed: 29738800
Resuscitation. 2016 Dec;109:116-120
pubmed: 27521469
Resuscitation. 2020 Oct;155:159-164
pubmed: 32755663
Resuscitation. 2010 Mar;81(3):293-6
pubmed: 20044198
Resuscitation. 2017 Jun;115:163-168
pubmed: 28385638
Resuscitation. 2008 Jan;76(1):69-75
pubmed: 17689171
Int Sch Res Notices. 2015 Nov 18;2015:246398
pubmed: 27347508