The impact of case complexity in resident-performed cataract surgery.


Journal

Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie
ISSN: 1435-702X
Titre abrégé: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8205248

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2023
Historique:
received: 13 05 2022
accepted: 25 02 2023
revised: 16 02 2023
medline: 26 7 2023
pubmed: 18 3 2023
entrez: 17 3 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To evaluate the association of capsular dye and/or a pupil expansion device (PED) usage on the rate of major complication in resident-performed cataract extraction. Resident cataract surgeries between 2016 and 2019 were included. The primary outcomes were anterior or posterior vitrectomy (AVx and PPVx). Cases were grouped by the use of a PED and/or capsular staining along with additional preoperative risk factors. Of the 1,348 cases, 371 (27.5%) documented capsular staining ("Dye-only"), 91 (6.8%) required pupil expansion ("PED-only"), and 100 (7.4%) used both capsular stain and a PED ("Both"). The remainder of cases (n=786, 58.3%) were classified as "Routine." Compared to the "Routine" group, "PED-only" and "Both" had significantly higher odds of an AVx (OR=2.90, 95% CI 1.27-6.19, P=0.01) and/or a PPVx (OR=2.33, 95% CI 1.07-5.12, P=0.04). Among the PPVx cases, the "PED-only" group has significantly higher odds than "Routine" and "Dye-only" (OR=4.64, 95% CI 1.68-12.79, P=0.01; and OR=6.48, 95% CI 1.7-25.0, P=0.005, respectively). In case-control analysis, vision, intraocular pressure, anterior chamber depth, axial length, cataract type, or severity had no significant overall association with complication. When compared to nuclear sclerotic cataract, posterior subcapsular (OR=7.86, 95% CI 1.46-42.47, P=0.017) and white/mature cataracts (OR=3.05, 95% CI 1.1-8.43, P=0.032) had increased odds of complication. Resident-performed cataract surgery frequently required capsular staining and/or a PED, and intuitively, these cases had a higher overall complication rate compared to routine cases. However, the use of a PED independently was associated with significantly higher odds of a major complication requiring an unplanned vitrectomy independent of predisposing factors.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36929055
doi: 10.1007/s00417-023-06027-y
pii: 10.1007/s00417-023-06027-y
pmc: PMC10018582
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2307-2314

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Références

Tzamalis A, Lamprogiannis L, Chalvatzis N, Symeonidis C, Dimitrakos S, Tsinopoulos I (2015) Training of resident ophthalmologists in cataract surgery: a comparative study of two approaches. J Ophthalmol 2015:932043. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/932043
doi: 10.1155/2015/932043 pubmed: 26075088 pmcid: 4446480
Han JV, Patel DV, Wallace HB, Kim BZ, Sherwin T, McGhee CNJ (2019) Auckland Cataract Study III: refining preoperative assessment with cataract risk stratification to reduce intraoperative complications. Am J Ophthalmol 197:114–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2018.09.026
doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.09.026 pubmed: 30278159
Nderitu P, Ursell P (2018) Updated cataract surgery complexity stratification score for trainee ophthalmic surgeons. J Cataract Refract Surg 44:709–717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.04.036
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.04.036 pubmed: 30041740
Narendran N, Jaycock P, Johnston RL, Taylor H, Adams M, Tole DM, Asaria RH, Galloway P, Sparrow JM (2009) The Cataract National Dataset electronic multicentre audit of 55,567 operations: risk stratification for posterior capsule rupture and vitreous loss. Eye (Lond) 23:31–37. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6703049
doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6703049 pubmed: 18327164
Dada VK, Sharma N, Sudan R, Sethi H, Dada T, Pangtey MS (2004) Anterior capsule staining for capsulorhexis in cases of white cataract: comparative clinical study. J Cataract Refract Surg 30:326–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-3350(03)00573-X
doi: 10.1016/S0886-3350(03)00573-X pubmed: 15030820
Goldman JM, Karp CL (2007) Adjunct devices for managing challenging cases in cataract surgery: capsular staining and ophthalmic viscosurgical devices. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 18:52–57. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0b013e3280121b24
doi: 10.1097/ICU.0b013e3280121b24 pubmed: 17159448
Fong CS, Mitchell P, de Loryn T, Rochtchina E, Hong T, Cugati S, Wang JJ (2012) Long-term outcomes of phacoemulsification cataract surgery performed by trainees and consultants in an Australian cohort. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 40:597–603. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9071.2012.02759.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2012.02759.x pubmed: 22300362
Woodfield AS, Gower EW, Cassard SD, Ramanthan S (2011) Intraoperative phacoemulsification complication rates of second- and third-year ophthalmology residents a 5-year comparison. Ophthalmology 118:954–958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.08.047
doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.08.047 pubmed: 21539981
Rutar T, Porco TC, Naseri A (2009) Risk factors for intraoperative complications in resident-performed phacoemulsification surgery. Ophthalmology 116:431–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.10.028
doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.10.028 pubmed: 19167084
Aaronson A, Viljanen A, Kanclerz P, Grzybowski A, Tuuminen R (2020) Cataract complications study: an analysis of adverse effects among 14,520 eyes in relation to surgical experience. Ann Transl Med 8:1541. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-845
doi: 10.21037/atm-20-845 pubmed: 33313286 pmcid: 7729371
Ellis EM, Lee JE, Saunders L, Haw WW, Granet DB, Heichel CW (2018) Complication rates of resident-performed cataract surgery: impact of early introduction of cataract surgery training. J Cataract Refract Surg 44:1109–1115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.06.022
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.06.022 pubmed: 30078539 pmcid: 6157597
Kaplowitz K, Yazdanie M, Abazari A (2018) A review of teaching methods and outcomes of resident phacoemulsification. Surv Ophthalmol 63:257–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2017.09.006
doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2017.09.006 pubmed: 28941765
Bai H, Yao L, Wang H (2020) Clinical investigation into posterior capsule rupture in phacoemulsification operations performed by surgery trainees. J Ophthalmol 2020:1317249. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1317249
doi: 10.1155/2020/1317249 pubmed: 32104591 pmcid: 7037484
Melega MV, Pessoa Cavalcanti Lira R, da Silva IC, Ferreira BG, Assis Filho HLG, Martini AAF, Dos Reis R, Arieta CEL, Alves M (2020) Comparing resident outcomes in cataract surgery at different levels of experience. Clin Ophthalmol 14:4523–4531. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S285967
doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S285967 pubmed: 33402815 pmcid: 7778434
Randleman JB, Wolfe JD, Woodward M, Lynn MJ, Cherwek DH, Srivastava SK (2007) The resident surgeon phacoemulsification learning curve. Arch Ophthalmol 125:1215–1219. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.125.9.1215
doi: 10.1001/archopht.125.9.1215 pubmed: 17846361
Oliveira-Ferreira C, Leuzinger-Dias M, Tavares Ferreira J, Macedo JP, Falcao-Reis F (2020) Cataract phacoemulsification performed by resident trainees and staff surgeons: intraoperative complications and early postoperative intraocular pressure elevation. J Cataract Refract Surg 46:555–561. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000105
doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000105 pubmed: 32271522
Saifee M, Zhu I, Lin Y, Oldenburg CE, Ramanathan S (2020) Effect of full-time vs volunteer faculty supervision on resident cataract surgery complications. J Cataract Refract Surg 46:700–704. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000145
doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000145 pubmed: 32358263 pmcid: 9982644
Blomquist PH, Morales ME, Tong L, Ahn C (2012) Risk factors for vitreous complications in resident-performed phacoemulsification surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 38:208–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.10.001
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.10.001 pubmed: 22104643
Kim JY, Ali R, Cremers SL, Yun SC, Henderson BA (2009) Incidence of intraoperative complications in cataract surgery performed by left-handed residents. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:1019–1025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.01.025
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.01.025 pubmed: 19465287
Nderitu P, Ursell P (2019) Iris hooks versus a pupil expansion ring: operating times, complications, and visual acuity outcomes in small pupil cases. J Cataract Refract Surg 45:167–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.08.038
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.08.038 pubmed: 30527439
Shingleton BJ, Crandall AS, Ahmed II (2009) Pseudoexfoliation and the cataract surgeon: preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative issues related to intraocular pressure, cataract, and intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:1101–1120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.03.011
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.03.011 pubmed: 19465298
Ariga M, Nivean M, Utkarsha P (2013) Pseudoexfoliation syndrome. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 7:118–120. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10008-1148
doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10008-1148 pubmed: 26997794
Nagashima RJ (2004) Decreased incidence of capsule complications and vitreous loss during phacoemulsification in eyes with pseudoexfoliation syndrome. J Cataract Refract Surg 30:127–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-3350(03)00465-6
doi: 10.1016/S0886-3350(03)00465-6 pubmed: 14967279
Hyams M, Mathalone N, Herskovitz M, Hod Y, Israeli D, Geyer O (2005) Intraoperative complications of phacoemulsification in eyes with and without pseudoexfoliation. J Cataract Refract Surg 31:1002–1005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.09.051
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.09.051 pubmed: 15975469
Nath M, Odayappan A, Tripathy K, Krishnamurthy P, Nachiappan S (2021) Predicting zonular strength based on maximum pupillary mydriasis in patients with pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Med Hypotheses 146:110402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2020.110402
doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2020.110402 pubmed: 33279326
Williams ER, Patnaik JL, Miller DC, Lynch AM, Davidson RS, Kahook MY, Seibold LK (2021) Iris manipulation during phacoemulsification: intraoperative and postoperative complications. Int J Ophthalmol 14:676–683. https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2021.05.06
doi: 10.18240/ijo.2021.05.06 pubmed: 34012881 pmcid: 8077016

Auteurs

Sally Se Park (SS)

Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.

Michael Tseng (M)

Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.

Zara Mian (Z)

Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.

Jee-Young Moon (JY)

Department of Epidemiology & Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.

Anurag Shrivastava (A)

Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA. ashrivas@montefiore.org.
Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, 3332 Rochambeau Ave, 3rd Floor, Bronx, NY, 10467, USA. ashrivas@montefiore.org.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH