Harnessing Fc/FcRn Affinity Data from Patents with Different Machine Learning Methods.


Journal

International journal of molecular sciences
ISSN: 1422-0067
Titre abrégé: Int J Mol Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101092791

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
16 Mar 2023
Historique:
received: 07 02 2023
revised: 07 03 2023
accepted: 11 03 2023
medline: 30 3 2023
entrez: 29 3 2023
pubmed: 30 3 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Monoclonal antibodies are biopharmaceuticals with a very long half-life due to the binding of their Fc portion to the neonatal receptor (FcRn), a pharmacokinetic property that can be further improved through engineering of the Fc portion, as demonstrated by the approval of several new drugs. Many Fc variants with increased binding to FcRn have been found using different methods, such as structure-guided design, random mutagenesis, or a combination of both, and are described in the literature as well as in patents. Our hypothesis is that this material could be subjected to a machine learning approach in order to generate new variants with similar properties. We therefore compiled 1323 Fc variants affecting the affinity for FcRn, which were disclosed in twenty patents. These data were used to train several algorithms, with two different models, in order to predict the affinity for FcRn of new randomly generated Fc variants. To determine which algorithm was the most robust, we first assessed the correlation between measured and predicted affinity in a 10-fold cross-validation test. We then generated variants by in silico random mutagenesis and compared the prediction made by the different algorithms. As a final validation, we produced variants, not described in any patents, and compared the predicted affinity with the experimental binding affinities measured by surface plasmon resonance (SPR). The best mean absolute error (MAE) between predicted and experimental values was obtained with a support vector regressor (SVR) using six features and trained on 1251 examples. With this setting, the error on the log(K

Identifiants

pubmed: 36982796
pii: ijms24065724
doi: 10.3390/ijms24065724
pmc: PMC10052518
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antibodies, Monoclonal 0
Histocompatibility Antigens Class I 0
Immunoglobulin G 0
Receptors, Fc 0
Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : Agence Nationale de la Recherche
ID : ANR-10-LABX-53-01
Organisme : ARD 2020 Biopharmaceuticals
ID : NA

Références

MAbs. 2019 Oct;11(7):1276-1288
pubmed: 31216930
Front Immunol. 2014 Oct 20;5:520
pubmed: 25368619
Protein Cell. 2018 Jan;9(1):15-32
pubmed: 28421387
Proteins. 2007 Jun 1;67(4):1078-86
pubmed: 17373710
J Biol Chem. 2001 Mar 2;276(9):6591-604
pubmed: 11096108
Nature. 2014 Oct 30;514(7524):642-5
pubmed: 25119033
MAbs. 2018 Nov-Dec;10(8):1322-1331
pubmed: 30130450
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2002 Jan;16(1):11-26
pubmed: 12197663
Proteins. 2013 Apr;81(4):704-14
pubmed: 23239118
MAbs. 2018 Oct;10(7):1098-1110
pubmed: 29947573
J Biol Chem. 2015 Feb 13;290(7):4282-90
pubmed: 25538249
PLoS One. 2013 May 07;8(5):e63236
pubmed: 23667591
J Proteome Res. 2010 May 7;9(5):2216-25
pubmed: 20329755
Nucleic Acids Res. 2005 Jul 1;33(Web Server issue):W382-8
pubmed: 15980494
J Biol Chem. 2006 Aug 18;281(33):23514-24
pubmed: 16793771
J Immunol. 2009 Jun 15;182(12):7663-71
pubmed: 19494290
J Mol Biol. 2002 Jul 5;320(2):369-87
pubmed: 12079393
Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2017 Jun;44:31-38
pubmed: 27866112
Nat Biotechnol. 2010 Feb;28(2):157-9
pubmed: 20081867
Protein Sci. 1992 Jan;1(1):169-81
pubmed: 1339024
J Biol Chem. 2016 Jan 22;291(4):1817-1825
pubmed: 26627822
Int Immunol. 2006 Dec;18(12):1759-69
pubmed: 17077181
Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2018 Oct;39(10):892-904
pubmed: 30143244
MAbs. 2019 Nov-Dec;11(8):1341-1350
pubmed: 31556789
J Biol Chem. 2014 Mar 14;289(11):7812-24
pubmed: 24469444
Drug Metab Dispos. 2010 Apr;38(4):600-5
pubmed: 20071453
Mol Biosyst. 2013 Dec;9(12):3047-58
pubmed: 24057047
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Aug 24;23(17):
pubmed: 36077002
Front Immunol. 2015 Feb 04;6:39
pubmed: 25699055
J Immunol. 2016 Jan 15;196(2):607-13
pubmed: 26685205

Auteurs

Christophe Dumet (C)

EA7501, Université de Tours, 37041 Tours, France.
MAbSilico, 1 Impasse du Palais, 37000 Tours, France.

Martine Pugnière (M)

Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, Université de Montpellier, 34090 Montpellier, France.

Corinne Henriquet (C)

Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, Université de Montpellier, 34090 Montpellier, France.

Valérie Gouilleux-Gruart (V)

EA7501, Université de Tours, 37041 Tours, France.
Laboratoire d'Immunologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, 37044 Tours, France.

Anne Poupon (A)

MAbSilico, 1 Impasse du Palais, 37000 Tours, France.
Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements, INRAE UMR-0085, CNRS UMR-7247, Université de Tours, 37380 Nouzilly, France.
Musca, Inria Saclay-Île-de-France, 91120 Palaiseau, France.

Hervé Watier (H)

EA7501, Université de Tours, 37041 Tours, France.
Laboratoire d'Immunologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, 37044 Tours, France.

Articles similaires

Humans COVID-19 Immunoglobulin G Antibodies, Viral SARS-CoV-2

Conservation of the cooling agent binding pocket within the TRPM subfamily.

Kate Huffer, Matthew C S Denley, Elisabeth V Oskoui et al.
1.00
TRPM Cation Channels Animals Binding Sites Mice Pyrimidinones
Fucosyltransferases Drug Repositioning Molecular Docking Simulation Molecular Dynamics Simulation Humans
1.00
Immunoconjugates Humans Antibodies, Bispecific Receptor, ErbB-2 Cell Line, Tumor

Classifications MeSH