Highly mismatch-tolerant homology testing by RecA could explain how homology length affects recombination.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 16 03 2023
accepted: 02 07 2023
medline: 17 7 2023
pubmed: 13 7 2023
entrez: 13 7 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

In E. coli, double strand breaks (DSBs) are resected and loaded with RecA protein. The genome is then rapidly searched for a sequence that is homologous to the DNA flanking the DSB. Mismatches in homologous partners are rare, suggesting that RecA should rapidly reject mismatched recombination products; however, this is not the case. Decades of work have shown that long lasting recombination products can include many mismatches. In this work, we show that in vitro RecA forms readily observable recombination products when 16% of the bases in the product are mismatched. We also consider various theoretical models of mismatch-tolerant homology testing. The models test homology by comparing the sequences of Ltest bases in two single-stranded DNAs (ssDNA) from the same genome. If the two sequences pass the homology test, the pairing between the two ssDNA becomes permanent. Stringency is the fraction of permanent pairings that join ssDNA from the same positions in the genome. We applied the models to both randomly generated genomes and bacterial genomes. For both randomly generated genomes and bacterial genomes, the models show that if no mismatches are accepted stringency is ∼ 99% when Ltest = 14 bp. For randomly generated genomes, stringency decreases with increasing mismatch tolerance, and stringency improves with increasing Ltest. In contrast, in bacterial genomes when Ltest ∼ 75 bp, stringency is ∼ 99% for both mismatch-intolerant and mismatch-tolerant homology testing. Furthermore, increasing Ltest does not improve stringency because most incorrect pairings join different copies of repeats. In sum, for bacterial genomes highly mismatch tolerant homology testing of 75 bp provides the same stringency as homology testing that rejects all mismatches and testing more than ∼75 base pairs is not useful. Interestingly, in vivo commitment to recombination typically requires homology testing of ∼ 75 bp, consistent with highly mismatch intolerant testing.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37440583
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288611
pii: PONE-D-23-07736
pmc: PMC10343044
doi:

Substances chimiques

DNA 9007-49-2
Rec A Recombinases EC 2.7.7.-
DNA, Single-Stranded 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0288611

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2023 Prentiss et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Nucleic Acids Res. 2001 Jun 15;29(12):2464-70
pubmed: 11410652
Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 Feb 28;47(4):1836-1846
pubmed: 30544167
Curr Genet. 2018 Dec;64(6):1189-1196
pubmed: 29700578
Nature. 2017 Apr 20;544(7650):377-380
pubmed: 28405019
Genome Biol. 2000;1(6):REVIEWS0006
pubmed: 11380986
J Biol Chem. 2019 May 24;294(21):8606-8616
pubmed: 30975899
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Sep 2;94(18):9786-91
pubmed: 9275203
J Mol Biol. 2021 Sep 3;433(18):167143
pubmed: 34242669
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jun 5;109(23):8901-6
pubmed: 22603794
PLoS Genet. 2018 Jan 19;14(1):e1007161
pubmed: 29351274
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017 Dec 19;372(1736):
pubmed: 29109227
Mol Cell. 2013 Aug 8;51(3):326-37
pubmed: 23932715
Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Jul 27;43(13):6473-85
pubmed: 26089391
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2015 Nov 02;7(11):
pubmed: 26525148
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007 Feb;8(2):127-38
pubmed: 17228330
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2012 Jun;76(2):217-28
pubmed: 22688812
EMBO J. 1991 Dec;10(13):4391-6
pubmed: 1836761
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 26;10(6):e0130875
pubmed: 26115175
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2014 Aug 01;6(8):
pubmed: 25085909
Trends Biochem Sci. 2016 Jun;41(6):491-507
pubmed: 27156117
J Biol Chem. 1994 Aug 5;269(31):19830-5
pubmed: 8051065
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Jan;87(1):21-5
pubmed: 2404275
Genetics. 2011 Dec;189(4):1225-33
pubmed: 21954161
Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34(18):5021-31
pubmed: 16990254
Genetics. 1986 Mar;112(3):441-57
pubmed: 3007275
Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2012 May 13;19(6):623-7
pubmed: 22580558
Science. 2015 Aug 28;349(6251):977-81
pubmed: 26315438
Cell. 2015 Feb 26;160(5):856-869
pubmed: 25684365
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Jul;82(14):4768-72
pubmed: 3161076
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Oct 28;94(22):11863-8
pubmed: 9342328
Genetics. 2002 Mar;160(3):851-9
pubmed: 11901106
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2008 Dec;72(4):642-71, Table of Contents
pubmed: 19052323
Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Dec 2;43(21):10251-63
pubmed: 26384422
Nature. 2008 May 22;453(7194):489-4
pubmed: 18497818
Genetics. 2016 Sep;204(1):139-52
pubmed: 27401752
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Jul 15;89(14):6492-6
pubmed: 1631148
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011 Mar;66(3):531-8
pubmed: 21212055

Auteurs

Mara Prentiss (M)

Department of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.

Dianzhuo Wang (D)

Department of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.

Jonathan Fu (J)

Department of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.

Chantal Prévost (C)

Laboratoire de Biochimie Théorique, Institut de Biologie Physico-Chimique, Paris, France.

Veronica Godoy-Carter (V)

Department of Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.

Nancy Kleckner (N)

Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.

Claudia Danilowicz (C)

Department of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.

Articles similaires

Female Biofilms Animals Lactobacillus Mice
Host Specificity Bacteriophages Genomics Algorithms Escherichia coli
DNA Methylation Humans DNA Animals Machine Learning
DNA Glycosylases Nucleosomes Humans 8-Hydroxy-2'-Deoxyguanosine DNA Repair

Classifications MeSH