Proteomics analysis of the influence of proteolysis on the subsequent glycation of myofibrillar protein.
Flavour
Glycation
Myofibrillar protein
Proteolysis
Proteomics
Journal
Food chemistry
ISSN: 1873-7072
Titre abrégé: Food Chem
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7702639
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Jan 2024
15 Jan 2024
Historique:
received:
21
12
2022
revised:
09
07
2023
accepted:
31
07
2023
medline:
7
9
2023
pubmed:
15
8
2023
entrez:
14
8
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Proteomics was used to study the influence of proteolysis on the glycation of myofibrillar proteins (MPs). Proteolysis by papain and proteinase K generated the highest level of amino acids (AAs) and peptides, respectively. Both the glycation degree (A value increased from 0.173 to 0.202-0.348) and speed (k value increased from 0.0099 to 0.0132-0.0145) were enhanced by proteolysis using papain and proteinase K. Proteomics analysis revealed that proteolysis largely enhanced the glycation site number in Lys, Arg and N-terminal residues (eg. Leu, Gly, Thr, Ala, Met, Ile, Phe and Val residues in myosin light chain). Proteolysis by papain preferentially acted on actin and therefore specifically increased the glycation sites from actin. Proteolysis reduced the level of aldehydes but enhanced the aromatic E-nose signals, possibly due to the combination of aldehydes with released AAs/peptides. The proteomics analysis helped to detail the relationship between proteolysis and subsequent glycation/flavour formation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37579610
pii: S0308-8146(23)01702-8
doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.137084
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Trypsin
EC 3.4.21.4
Endopeptidase K
EC 3.4.21.64
Papain
EC 3.4.22.2
Actins
0
Amino Acids
0
Peptide Fragments
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
137084Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.