On the interpretation of transcriptome-wide association studies.


Journal

PLoS genetics
ISSN: 1553-7404
Titre abrégé: PLoS Genet
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101239074

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 2023
Historique:
received: 04 05 2023
accepted: 15 08 2023
revised: 19 09 2023
medline: 20 9 2023
pubmed: 7 9 2023
entrez: 7 9 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Transcriptome-wide association studies (TWAS) aim to detect relationships between gene expression and a phenotype, and are commonly used for secondary analysis of genome-wide association study (GWAS) results. Results from TWAS analyses are often interpreted as indicating a genetic relationship between gene expression and a phenotype, but this interpretation is not consistent with the null hypothesis that is evaluated in the traditional TWAS framework. In this study we provide a mathematical outline of this TWAS framework, and elucidate what interpretations are warranted given the null hypothesis it actually tests. We then use both simulations and real data analysis to assess the implications of misinterpreting TWAS results as indicative of a genetic relationship between gene expression and the phenotype. Our simulation results show considerably inflated type 1 error rates for TWAS when interpreted this way, with 41% of significant TWAS associations detected in the real data analysis found to have insufficient statistical evidence to infer such a relationship. This demonstrates that in current implementations, TWAS cannot reliably be used to investigate genetic relationships between gene expression and a phenotype, but that local genetic correlation analysis can serve as a potential alternative.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37676898
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1010921
pii: PGENETICS-D-23-00513
pmc: PMC10508613
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e1010921

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2023 de Leeuw et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Basic Res Cardiol. 2022 Feb 17;117(1):6
pubmed: 35175464
Int J Epidemiol. 2019 Jun 1;48(3):728-742
pubmed: 30561657
Am J Hum Genet. 2020 Oct 1;107(4):714-726
pubmed: 32961112
Am J Hum Genet. 2019 Aug 1;105(2):258-266
pubmed: 31230719
PLoS Genet. 2014 May 15;10(5):e1004383
pubmed: 24830394
Sci Rep. 2020 Jan 31;10(1):1584
pubmed: 32005911
Am J Hum Genet. 2018 May 3;102(5):904-919
pubmed: 29727690
Genet Epidemiol. 2020 Sep;44(6):550-563
pubmed: 32350919
Nat Commun. 2019 Jul 24;10(1):3300
pubmed: 31341166
Nat Commun. 2021 May 17;12(1):2878
pubmed: 34001886
PLoS Genet. 2021 Mar 8;17(3):e1009398
pubmed: 33684137
Genes (Basel). 2022 Jun 13;13(6):
pubmed: 35741817
Mol Psychiatry. 2022 Dec;27(12):5167-5176
pubmed: 36100668
Hum Mol Genet. 2019 Jan 1;28(1):166-174
pubmed: 30239722
Genetics. 2017 Nov;207(3):893-902
pubmed: 28893853
Nat Genet. 2016 May;48(5):481-7
pubmed: 27019110
Nat Genet. 2019 Apr;51(4):675-682
pubmed: 30926970
Nat Genet. 2016 Mar;48(3):245-52
pubmed: 26854917
World J Biol Psychiatry. 2022 Sep;23(7):548-559
pubmed: 34870556
Nat Commun. 2020 Jul 31;11(1):3861
pubmed: 32737316
Nat Commun. 2018 May 8;9(1):1825
pubmed: 29739930
Front Genet. 2020 May 13;11:424
pubmed: 32477401
Am J Hum Genet. 2017 Mar 2;100(3):473-487
pubmed: 28238358
Nat Genet. 2019 Sep;51(9):1339-1348
pubmed: 31427789
Nat Genet. 2019 Apr;51(4):592-599
pubmed: 30926968
Nat Genet. 2013 Jun;45(6):580-5
pubmed: 23715323
Genet Epidemiol. 2020 Apr;44(3):221-232
pubmed: 31821608
PLoS Comput Biol. 2020 Nov 2;16(11):e1008315
pubmed: 33137096
Nature. 2018 Oct;562(7726):203-209
pubmed: 30305743
Nat Genet. 2018 Aug;50(8):1112-1121
pubmed: 30038396
Quant Biol. 2021 Jun;9(2):107-121
pubmed: 35433074
Am J Hum Genet. 2017 Nov 2;101(5):737-751
pubmed: 29100087
Nat Genet. 2022 Mar;54(3):274-282
pubmed: 35288712
Nat Genet. 2019 Mar;51(3):568-576
pubmed: 30804563
Nature. 2015 Oct 1;526(7571):68-74
pubmed: 26432245
PLoS Genet. 2021 Apr 2;17(4):e1009482
pubmed: 33798195
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2022 Mar 23;8(1):39
pubmed: 35322040
PLoS Med. 2015 Mar 31;12(3):e1001779
pubmed: 25826379
Nat Genet. 2015 Sep;47(9):1091-8
pubmed: 26258848
Am J Hum Genet. 2017 Feb 2;100(2):228-237
pubmed: 28065468
Am J Hum Genet. 2016 Dec 1;99(6):1245-1260
pubmed: 27866706
World Psychiatry. 2020 Feb;19(1):113-114
pubmed: 31922671
Bioinformatics. 2019 May 15;35(10):1644-1652
pubmed: 30295737

Auteurs

Christiaan de Leeuw (C)

Department of Complex Trait Genetics, Centre for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Josefin Werme (J)

Department of Complex Trait Genetics, Centre for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Jeanne E Savage (JE)

Department of Complex Trait Genetics, Centre for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Wouter J Peyrot (WJ)

Department of Complex Trait Genetics, Centre for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Danielle Posthuma (D)

Department of Complex Trait Genetics, Centre for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychology and Psychiatry, section Complex Trait Genetics, Amsterdam Neuroscience, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Articles similaires

Humans Macular Degeneration Mendelian Randomization Analysis Life Style Genome-Wide Association Study
Humans Meta-Analysis as Topic Sample Size Models, Statistical Computer Simulation
Arabidopsis Arabidopsis Proteins Osmotic Pressure Cytoplasm RNA, Messenger
Animals Lung India Sheep Transcriptome

Classifications MeSH