Rearrangement Events on Circular Genomes.


Journal

Bulletin of mathematical biology
ISSN: 1522-9602
Titre abrégé: Bull Math Biol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0401404

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
25 09 2023
Historique:
received: 10 01 2023
accepted: 31 08 2023
medline: 4 10 2023
pubmed: 26 9 2023
entrez: 25 9 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Early literature on genome rearrangement modelling views the problem of computing evolutionary distances as an inherently combinatorial one. In particular, attention is given to estimating distances using the minimum number of events required to transform one genome into another. In hindsight, this approach is analogous to early methods for inferring phylogenetic trees from DNA sequences such as maximum parsimony-both are motivated by the principle that the true distance minimises evolutionary change, and both are effective if this principle is a true reflection of reality. Recent literature considers genome rearrangement under statistical models, continuing this parallel with DNA-based methods, with the goal of using model-based methods (for example maximum likelihood techniques) to compute distance estimates that incorporate the large number of rearrangement paths that can transform one genome into another. Crucially, this approach requires one to decide upon a set of feasible rearrangement events and, in this paper, we focus on characterising well-motivated models for signed, uni-chromosomal circular genomes, where the number of regions remains fixed. Since rearrangements are often mathematically described using permutations, we isolate the sets of permutations representing rearrangements that are biologically reasonable in this context, for example inversions and transpositions. We provide precise mathematical expressions for these rearrangements, and then describe them in terms of the set of cuts made in the genome when they are applied. We directly compare cuts to breakpoints, and use this concept to count the distinct rearrangement actions which apply a given number of cuts. Finally, we provide some examples of rearrangement models, and include a discussion of some questions that arise when defining plausible models.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37749280
doi: 10.1007/s11538-023-01209-5
pii: 10.1007/s11538-023-01209-5
pmc: PMC10520144
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

107

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

J Mol Evol. 2002 Jul;55(1):24-36
pubmed: 12165840
PLoS Comput Biol. 2006 Feb;2(2):e14
pubmed: 16501665
Bioinformatics. 2008 Jul 1;24(13):i114-22
pubmed: 18586703
Bioinformatics. 2003;19 Suppl 1:i190-6
pubmed: 12855457
Bull Math Biol. 2019 Feb;81(2):535-567
pubmed: 30264286
J Math Biol. 2014 Dec;69(6-7):1693-718
pubmed: 24375264
J Bioinform Comput Biol. 2021 Dec;19(6):2140011
pubmed: 34775923
J Theor Biol. 2017 Jun 21;423:31-40
pubmed: 28435014
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform. 2013 Jul-Aug;10(4):819-31
pubmed: 24334378
Algorithms Mol Biol. 2018 Jul 26;13:13
pubmed: 30065782
BMC Bioinformatics. 2015;16 Suppl 19:S3
pubmed: 26695591
J Math Biol. 2022 May 5;84(6):49
pubmed: 35508785
PLoS Genet. 2008 Jul 18;4(7):e1000128
pubmed: 18650965
J Comput Biol. 2001;8(5):483-91
pubmed: 11694179
J Math Biol. 2020 May;80(6):1971-1992
pubmed: 32253463
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Jun 24;100(13):7672-7
pubmed: 12810957
J Struct Biol. 2006 Nov;156(2):292-303
pubmed: 16860572
J Math Biol. 2014 Jul;69(1):243-65
pubmed: 23793228
Bull Math Biol. 2018 Dec;80(12):3227-3246
pubmed: 30288640
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform. 2007 Jan-Mar;4(1):4-16
pubmed: 17277409
J Bioinform Comput Biol. 2021 Dec;19(6):2140015
pubmed: 34806949
Algorithms Mol Biol. 2019 Nov 05;14:21
pubmed: 31709002
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform. 2017 May-Jun;14(3):620-633
pubmed: 26761858

Auteurs

Joshua Stevenson (J)

University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia. joshua.stevenson@utas.edu.au.

Venta Terauds (V)

University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.

Jeremy Sumner (J)

University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.

Articles similaires

Genome, Chloroplast Phylogeny Genetic Markers Base Composition High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

Selecting optimal software code descriptors-The case of Java.

Yegor Bugayenko, Zamira Kholmatova, Artem Kruglov et al.
1.00
Software Algorithms Programming Languages
Animals Hemiptera Insect Proteins Phylogeny Insecticides
Amaryllidaceae Alkaloids Lycoris NADPH-Ferrihemoprotein Reductase Gene Expression Regulation, Plant Plant Proteins

Classifications MeSH