Structure of the transcription open complex of distinct σ


Journal

Nature communications
ISSN: 2041-1723
Titre abrégé: Nat Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101528555

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
13 10 2023
Historique:
received: 22 03 2023
accepted: 15 09 2023
medline: 23 10 2023
pubmed: 14 10 2023
entrez: 13 10 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Bacterial σ

Identifiants

pubmed: 37833284
doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-41796-4
pii: 10.1038/s41467-023-41796-4
pmc: PMC10575876
doi:

Substances chimiques

Bacterial Proteins 0
Sigma Factor 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

6455

Informations de copyright

© 2023. Springer Nature Limited.

Références

Murakami, K. S., Masuda, S., Campbell, E. A., Muzzin, O. & Darst, S. A. Structural basis of transcription initiation: an RNA polymerase holoenzyme-DNA complex. Science 296, 1285–1290 (2002).
pubmed: 12016307 doi: 10.1126/science.1069595
Marr, M. T. & Roberts, J. W. Promoter recognition as measured by binding of polymerase to nontemplate strand oligonucleotide. Science 276, 1258–1260 (1997).
pubmed: 9157885 doi: 10.1126/science.276.5316.1258
Staroń, A. et al. The third pillar of bacterial signal transduction: classification of the extracytoplasmic function (ECF) σ factor protein family. Mol. Microbiol. 74, 557–581 (2009).
pubmed: 19737356 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06870.x
Lonetto, M., Gribskov, M. & Gross, C. A. The σ
pubmed: 1597408 pmcid: 206090 doi: 10.1128/jb.174.12.3843-3849.1992
Paget, M. S. & Helmann, J. D. The σ
pubmed: 12540296 pmcid: 151288 doi: 10.1186/gb-2003-4-1-203
Pinto, D., Liu, Q. & Mascher, T. ECF σ factors with regulatory extensions: the one-component systems of the σ universe. Mol. Microbiol. 112, 399–409 (2019).
pubmed: 31175685 doi: 10.1111/mmi.14323
Brooks, B. E. & Buchanan, S. K. Signaling mechanisms for activation of extracytoplasmic function (ECF) sigma factors. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1778, 1930–1945 (2008).
pubmed: 17673165 doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2007.06.005
Pinto, D. et al. Engineering orthogonal synthetic timer circuits based on extracytoplasmic function σ factors. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, 7450–7464 (2018).
pubmed: 29986061 pmcid: 6101570 doi: 10.1093/nar/gky614
Zuo, Y. & Steitz, T. A. Crystal structures of the E. coli transcription initiation complexes with a complete bubble. Mol. Cell 58, 534–540 (2015).
pubmed: 25866247 pmcid: 5567806 doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.03.010
Bae B., Feklistov A., Lass-Napiorkowska A., Landick R. & Darst S. A. Structure of a bacterial RNA polymerase holoenzyme open promoter complex. eLife 4, e08504 (2015).
pubmed: 26349032 pmcid: 4593229 doi: 10.7554/eLife.08504
Cartagena, A. J. et al. Structural basis for transcription activation by Crl through tethering of σ
pubmed: 31484766 pmcid: 6754549 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1910827116
Liu, B., Zuo, Y. & Steitz, T. A. Structures of E. coli σ
pubmed: 27035955 pmcid: 4839411 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1520555113
Shi, W. et al. Structural basis of bacterial σ
pubmed: 32484956 pmcid: 7360974 doi: 10.15252/embj.2020104389
Lu, Q. et al. Structural insight into the mechanism of σ
pubmed: 37238608 pmcid: 10216364 doi: 10.3390/biom13050738
Fang, C. et al. Structures and mechanism of transcription initiation by bacterial ECF factors. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, 7094–7104 (2019).
pubmed: 31131408 pmcid: 6648896 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz470
Li, L., Fang, C., Zhuang, N., Wang, T. & Zhang, Y. Structural basis for transcription initiation by bacterial ECF σ factors. Nat. Commun. 10, 1153 (2019).
pubmed: 30858373 pmcid: 6411747 doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09096-y
Lin, W. et al. Structural basis of ECF-σ-factor-dependent transcription initiation. Nat. Commun. 10, 710 (2019).
pubmed: 30755604 pmcid: 6372665 doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08443-3
Glyde, R. et al. Structures of RNA polymerase closed and intermediate complexes reveal mechanisms of DNA opening and transcription initiation. Mol. Cell 67, 106–116 (2017).
pubmed: 28579332 pmcid: 5505868 doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.05.010
Campbell, E. A., Kamath, S., Rajashankar, K. R., Wu, M. & Darst, S. A. Crystal structure of Aquifex aeolicus σ
pubmed: 28223493 pmcid: 5347599 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1619464114
Nataf, Y. et al. Clostridium thermocellum cellulosomal genes are regulated by extracytoplasmic polysaccharides via alternative sigma factors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 18646–18651 (2010).
pubmed: 20937888 pmcid: 2972930 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1012175107
Ramaniuk, O. et al. σ
pubmed: 29914988 pmcid: 6088155 doi: 10.1128/JB.00251-18
Zuber, U., Drzewiecki, K. & Hecker, M. Putative sigma factor SigI (YkoZ) of Bacillus subtilis is induced by heat shock. J. Bacteriol. 183, 1472–1475 (2001).
pubmed: 11157964 pmcid: 95025 doi: 10.1128/JB.183.4.1472-1475.2001
Wei, Z. et al. Alternative σ
pubmed: 31106374 pmcid: 6582324 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz355
Kahel-Raifer, H. et al. The unique set of putative membrane-associated anti-σ factors in Clostridium thermocellum suggests a novel extracellular carbohydrate-sensing mechanism involved in gene regulation. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 308, 84–93 (2010).
pubmed: 20487018 doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2010.01997.x
Casas-Pastor, D. et al. Expansion and re-classification of the extracytoplasmic function (ECF) σ factor family. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, 986–1005 (2021).
pubmed: 33398323 pmcid: 7826278 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa1229
Gruber, T. M. & Gross, C. A. Multiple sigma subunits and the partitioning of bacterial transcription space. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 57, 441–466 (2003).
pubmed: 14527287 doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.57.030502.090913
Ortiz de Ora, L. et al. Regulation of biomass degradation by alternative σ factors in cellulolytic clostridia. Sci. Rep. 8, 11036 (2018).
pubmed: 30038431 pmcid: 6056542 doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-29245-5
Muñoz-Gutiérrez, I. et al. Decoding biomass-sensing regulons of Clostridium thermocellum alternative sigma-I factors in a heterologous Bacillus subtilis host system. PLoS ONE 11, e0146316 (2016).
pubmed: 26731480 pmcid: 4711584 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146316
Izquierdo, J. A. et al. Complete genome sequence of Clostridium clariflavum DSM 19732. Stand. Genom. Sci. 6, 104–115 (2012).
doi: 10.4056/sigs.2535732
Yaniv, O. et al. Fine-structural variance of family 3 carbohydrate-binding modules as extracellular biomass-sensing components of Clostridium thermocellum anti-σ
doi: 10.1107/S139900471302926X
Ding, X. K., Chen, C., Cui, Q., Li, W. L. & Feng, Y. G. Resonance assignments of the periplasmic domain of a cellulose-sensing trans-membrane anti-sigma factor from Clostridium thermocellum. Biomol. NMR Assign. 9, 321–324 (2015).
pubmed: 25682099 doi: 10.1007/s12104-015-9601-7
Chen, C. et al. Essential autoproteolysis of bacterial anti-σ factor RsgI for transmembrane signal transduction. Sci. Adv. 9, eadg4846 (2023).
pubmed: 37418529 pmcid: 10328401 doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adg4846
Brunet, Y. R., Habib, C., Brogan, A. P., Artzi, L. & Rudner, D. Z. Intrinsically disordered protein regions are required for cell wall homeostasis in Bacillus subtilis. Genes Dev. 36, 970–984 (2022).
pubmed: 36265902 pmcid: 9732909
Narayanan, A. et al. Cryo-EM structure of Escherichia coli σ
pubmed: 29581236 pmcid: 5949986 doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA118.002161
Shi, J. et al. Transcription activation by a sliding clamp. Nat. Commun. 12, 1131 (2021).
pubmed: 33602900 pmcid: 7892883 doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21392-0
Boyaci, H., Chen, J., Jansen, R., Darst, S. A. & Campbell, E. A. Structures of an RNA polymerase promoter melting intermediate elucidate DNA unwinding. Nature 565, 382–385 (2019).
pubmed: 30626968 pmcid: 6399747 doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0840-5
Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021).
pubmed: 34265844 pmcid: 8371605 doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2
Zhang, X. et al. Molecular basis of TcdR-dependent promoter activity for toxin production by Clostridioides difficile studied by a heterologous reporter system. Toxins 15, 306 (2023).
pubmed: 37235341 pmcid: 10223161 doi: 10.3390/toxins15050306
Fang, C. et al. CueR activates transcription through a DNA distortion mechanism. Nat. Chem. Biol. 17, 57–64 (2021).
pubmed: 32989300 doi: 10.1038/s41589-020-00653-x
Burkhoff, A. M. & Tullius, T. D. The unusual conformation adopted by the adenine tracts in kinetoplast DNA. Cell 48, 935–943 (1987).
pubmed: 3030560 doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90702-1
Neidle S. In Principles of Nucleic Acid Structure (ed. Neidle S.). (Academic Press, 2008).
Barbic, A., Zimmer, D. P. & Crothers, D. M. Structural origins of adenine-tract bending. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 2369–2373 (2003).
pubmed: 12586860 pmcid: 151347 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0437877100
Fang, C. et al. The bacterial multidrug resistance regulator BmrR distorts promoter DNA to activate transcription. Nat. Commun. 11, 6284 (2020).
pubmed: 33293519 pmcid: 7722741 doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20134-y
Lane, W. J. & Darst, S. A. The structural basis for promoter −35 element recognition by the group IV sigma factors. PLoS Biol. 4, e269 (2006).
pubmed: 16903784 pmcid: 1540707 doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040269
Holm, L. & Rosenström, P. Dali server: conservation mapping in 3D. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, 275–288 (2010).
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq366
Light, S. H., Cahoon, L. A., Halavaty, A. S., Freitag, N. E. & Anderson, W. F. Structure to function of an α-glucan metabolic pathway that promotes Listeria monocytogenes pathogenesis. Nat. Microbiol. 2, 16202 (2016).
pubmed: 27819654 doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.202
Chen, J. et al. Stepwise promoter melting by bacterial RNA polymerase. Mol. Cell 78, 275–288 (2020).
pubmed: 32160514 pmcid: 7166197 doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.02.017
Saecker, R. M. et al. Structural origins of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase open promoter complex stability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2112877118 (2021).
pubmed: 34599106 pmcid: 8501879 doi: 10.1073/pnas.2112877118
Wang, F. et al. Structural basis for transcription inhibition by E. coli SspA. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, 9931–9942 (2020).
pubmed: 32785630 pmcid: 7515715 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa672
Campagne, S., Marsh, M. E., Capitani, G., Vorholt, J. A. & Allain, F. H. T. Structural basis for −10 promoter element melting by environmentally induced sigma factors. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 21, 269–276 (2014).
pubmed: 24531660 doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2777
Pinto, D. & da Fonseca, R. R. Evolution of the extracytoplasmic function σ factor protein family. NAR Genom. Bioinform. 2, lqz026 (2020).
pubmed: 33575573 pmcid: 7671368 doi: 10.1093/nargab/lqz026
Crane-Robinson, C., Dragan, A. I. & Privalov, P. L. The extended arms of DNA-binding domains: a tale of tails. Trends Biochem. Sci. 31, 547–552 (2006).
pubmed: 16920361 doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2006.08.006
Rohs, R. et al. The role of DNA shape in protein–DNA recognition. Nature 461, 1248–1253 (2009).
pubmed: 19865164 pmcid: 2793086 doi: 10.1038/nature08473
Aravind, L., Anantharaman, V., Balaji, S., Babu, M. M. & Iyer, L. M. The many faces of the helix-turn-helix domain: transcription regulation and beyond. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 29, 231–262 (2005).
pubmed: 15808743 doi: 10.1016/j.femsre.2004.12.008
Bayer, E. A., Morag, E. & Lamed, R. The cellulosome—a treasure-trove for biotechnology. Trends Biotechnol. 12, 379–386 (1994).
pubmed: 7765191 doi: 10.1016/0167-7799(94)90039-6
Feng, Y., Liu, Y.-J. & Cui, Q. Research progress in cellulosomes and their applications in synthetic biology. Synth. Biol. J. 3, 138–154 (2022).
Ma, X., Ma, L. & Huo, Y. X. Reconstructing the transcription regulatory network to optimize resource allocation for robust biosynthesis. Trends Biotechnol. 40, 735–751 (2022).
pubmed: 34895933 doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2021.11.002
Zong, Y. et al. Insulated transcriptional elements enable precise design of genetic circuits. Nat. Commun. 8, 52 (2017).
pubmed: 28674389 pmcid: 5495784 doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00063-z
Zhang, J. et al. Efficient whole-cell-catalyzing cellulose saccharification using engineered Clostridium thermocellum. Biotechnol. Biofuels 10, 124 (2017).
Qi, K. et al. Coordinated β-glucosidase activity with the cellulosome is effective for enhanced lignocellulose saccharification. Bioresour. Technol. 337, 125441 (2021).
pubmed: 34182347 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125441
Mastronarde, D. N. Automated electron microscope tomography using robust prediction of specimen movements. J. Struct. Biol. 152, 36–51 (2005).
pubmed: 16182563 doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2005.07.007
Tegunov, D. & Cramer, P. Real-time cryo-electron microscopy data preprocessing with Warp. Nat. Methods 16, 1146–1152 (2019).
pubmed: 31591575 pmcid: 6858868 doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0580-y
Punjani, A., Rubinstein, J. L., Fleet, D. J. & Brubaker, M. A. cryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination. Nat. Methods 14, 290–296 (2017).
pubmed: 28165473 doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4169
Zivanov, J. et al. New tools for automated high-resolution cryo-EM structure determination in RELION-3. eLife 7, e42166 (2018).
Zhong, E. D., Bepler, T., Berger, B. & Davis, J. H. CryoDRGN: reconstruction of heterogeneous cryo-EM structures using neural networks. Nat. Methods 18, 176–185 (2021).
pubmed: 33542510 pmcid: 8183613 doi: 10.1038/s41592-020-01049-4
Terwilliger, T. C., Ludtke, S. J., Read, R. J., Adams, P. D. & Afonine, P. V. Improvement of cryo-EM maps by density modification. Nat. Methods 17, 923–927 (2020).
pubmed: 32807957 pmcid: 7484085 doi: 10.1038/s41592-020-0914-9
Sanchez-Garcia, R. et al. DeepEMhancer: a deep learning solution for cryo-EM volume post-processing. Commun. Biol. 4, 874 (2021).
pubmed: 34267316 pmcid: 8282847 doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-02399-1
Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera—visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004).
pubmed: 15264254 doi: 10.1002/jcc.20084
Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 486–501 (2010).
doi: 10.1107/S0907444910007493
Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 213–221 (2010).
doi: 10.1107/S0907444909052925
Goddard, T. D. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: meeting modern challenges in visualization and analysis. Protein Sci. 27, 14–25 (2018).
pubmed: 28710774 doi: 10.1002/pro.3235
Härtl, B., Wehrl, W., Wiegert, T., Homuth, G. & Schumann, W. Development of a new integration site within the Bacillus subtilis chromosome and construction of compatible expression cassettes. J. Bacteriol. 183, 2696–2699 (2001).
pubmed: 11274134 pmcid: 95191 doi: 10.1128/JB.183.8.2696-2699.2001
Guiziou, S. et al. A part toolbox to tune genetic expression in Bacillus subtilis. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, 7495–7508 (2016).
pubmed: 27402159 pmcid: 5009755
Radeck, J. et al. The Bacillus BioBrick Box: generation and evaluation of essential genetic building blocks for standardized work with Bacillus subtilis. J. Biol. Eng. 7, 29 (2013).
pubmed: 24295448 pmcid: 4177231 doi: 10.1186/1754-1611-7-29
Trachman, R. J. 3rd et al. Structural basis for high-affinity fluorophore binding and activation by RNA Mango. Nat. Chem. Biol. 13, 807–813 (2017).
pubmed: 28553947 pmcid: 5550021 doi: 10.1038/nchembio.2392
He, D. et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa SutA wedges RNAP lobe domain open to facilitate promoter DNA unwinding. Nat. Commun. 13, 4204 (2022).
pubmed: 35859063 pmcid: 9300723 doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31871-7

Auteurs

Jie Li (J)

CAS Key Laboratory of Biofuels, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 266101, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Synthetic Biology, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 266101, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Shandong Engineering Laboratory of Single Cell Oil, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 266101, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Shandong Energy Institute, 266101, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Qingdao New Energy Shandong Laboratory, 266101, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100049, Beijing, China.

Haonan Zhang (H)

University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100049, Beijing, China.
National Laboratory of Biomacromolecules, CAS Center for Excellence in Biomacromolecules, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100101, Beijing, China.

Dongyu Li (D)

University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100049, Beijing, China.
National Laboratory of Biomacromolecules, CAS Center for Excellence in Biomacromolecules, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100101, Beijing, China.

Ya-Jun Liu (YJ)

CAS Key Laboratory of Biofuels, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 266101, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Synthetic Biology, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 266101, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Shandong Engineering Laboratory of Single Cell Oil, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 266101, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Shandong Energy Institute, 266101, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Qingdao New Energy Shandong Laboratory, 266101, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100049, Beijing, China.

Edward A Bayer (EA)

Department of Biomolecular Sciences, The Weizmann Institute of Science, 7610001, Rehovot, Israel.
Department of Life Sciences and the National Institute for Biotechnology in the Negev, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, 8499000, Beer-Sheva, Israel.

Qiu Cui (Q)

CAS Key Laboratory of Biofuels, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 266101, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Synthetic Biology, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 266101, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Shandong Engineering Laboratory of Single Cell Oil, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 266101, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Shandong Energy Institute, 266101, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Qingdao New Energy Shandong Laboratory, 266101, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100049, Beijing, China.

Yingang Feng (Y)

CAS Key Laboratory of Biofuels, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 266101, Qingdao, Shandong, China. fengyg@qibebt.ac.cn.
Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Synthetic Biology, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 266101, Qingdao, Shandong, China. fengyg@qibebt.ac.cn.
Shandong Engineering Laboratory of Single Cell Oil, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 266101, Qingdao, Shandong, China. fengyg@qibebt.ac.cn.
Shandong Energy Institute, 266101, Qingdao, Shandong, China. fengyg@qibebt.ac.cn.
Qingdao New Energy Shandong Laboratory, 266101, Qingdao, Shandong, China. fengyg@qibebt.ac.cn.
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100049, Beijing, China. fengyg@qibebt.ac.cn.

Ping Zhu (P)

University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100049, Beijing, China. zhup@ibp.ac.cn.
National Laboratory of Biomacromolecules, CAS Center for Excellence in Biomacromolecules, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100101, Beijing, China. zhup@ibp.ac.cn.

Articles similaires

Photosynthesis Ribulose-Bisphosphate Carboxylase Carbon Dioxide Molecular Dynamics Simulation Cyanobacteria
Populus Soil Microbiology Soil Microbiota Fungi
Aerosols Humans Decontamination Air Microbiology Masks
Coal Metagenome Phylogeny Bacteria Genome, Bacterial

Classifications MeSH