Feedback that Lands: Exploring How Residents Receive and Judge Feedback During Entrustable Professional Activities.


Journal

Perspectives on medical education
ISSN: 2212-277X
Titre abrégé: Perspect Med Educ
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101590643

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 21 04 2023
accepted: 03 10 2023
medline: 2 11 2023
pubmed: 23 10 2023
entrez: 23 10 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Receiving feedback from different types of assessors (e.g., senior residents, staff supervisors) may impact trainees' perceptions of the quantity and quality of data during entrustable professional activity (EPA) assessments. We evaluated the quality of EPA feedback provided by different assessors (senior residents, chief medical residents/subspecialty residents, and staff) and explored residents' judgements of the value of this feedback. From a database of 2228 EPAs, we calculated the frequency of contribution from three assessor groups. We appraised the quality of 60 procedure-related EPAs completed between July 2019 and March 2020 using a modified Completed Clinical Evaluation Report Rating (CCERR) tool. Next, we asked 15 internal medicine residents to sort randomly selected EPAs according to their judgements of value, as an elicitation exercise before a semi-structured interview. Interviews explored participants' perceptions of quality of written feedback and helpful assessors. Residents completed over 60% of EPA assessments. We found no difference in modified-CCERR scores between the three groups. When judging EPA feedback value, residents described a process of weighted deliberation, considering perceived assessor characteristics (e.g., credibility, experience with EPA system), actionable written comments, and their own self-assessment. Like other recent studies, we found that residents contributed most to procedure-related EPA assessments. To the established list of factors influencing residents' judgements of feedback value, we add assessors' adherence to, and their shared experiences of being assessed within, EPA assessment systems. We focus on the implications for how assessors and leaders can build credibility in themselves and in the practices of EPA assessments.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37868076
doi: 10.5334/pme.1020
pmc: PMC10588547
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

427-437

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s).

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have no competing interests to declare.

Références

Ann Intern Med. 2018 May 15;168(10):724-729
pubmed: 29710333
Med Educ. 2013 Jun;47(6):585-94
pubmed: 23662876
Perspect Med Educ. 2014 Apr;3(2):124-8
pubmed: 24604762
Acad Med. 2020 Nov;95(11):1712-1717
pubmed: 32195692
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2008 Winter;28(1):14-9
pubmed: 18366120
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2008 Aug;13(3):361-72
pubmed: 17124627
Acad Med. 2022 May 1;97(5):711-717
pubmed: 34879012
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2022 Mar;27(1):229-262
pubmed: 34570298
Med Educ. 2008 Aug;42(8):816-22
pubmed: 18564093
Acad Med. 2010 Oct;85(10 Suppl):S102-5
pubmed: 20881690
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2020 Aug;25(3):641-654
pubmed: 31872326
Med Teach. 2010;32(8):638-45
pubmed: 20662574
Med Teach. 2010;32(8):651-6
pubmed: 20662576
Perspect Med Educ. 2017 Aug;6(4):256-264
pubmed: 28577253
Perspect Med Educ. 2015 Dec;4(6):284-299
pubmed: 26621488
Med Educ. 2006 Feb;40(2):101-8
pubmed: 16451236
J Grad Med Educ. 2023 Feb;15(1):74-80
pubmed: 36817541
Med Sci Educ. 2021 Jan 11;31(2):923-933
pubmed: 34457934
Med Teach. 2022 Dec;44(12):1362-1367
pubmed: 35793243
J Grad Med Educ. 2015 Jun;7(2):208-13
pubmed: 26221436
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2008 Winter;28(1):47-54
pubmed: 18366127
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 25;18(23):
pubmed: 34886136
Cureus. 2022 Jun 9;14(6):e25798
pubmed: 35836450
Acad Med. 2014 Mar;89(3):490-6
pubmed: 24448043
Med Educ. 2016 Sep;50(9):943-54
pubmed: 27562894
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2012 Mar;17(1):15-26
pubmed: 21468778
Med Educ. 2012 Feb;46(2):192-200
pubmed: 22239333
Qual Health Res. 2016 Nov;26(13):1753-1760
pubmed: 26613970
Perspect Med Educ. 2016 Oct;5(5):262-4
pubmed: 27638393

Auteurs

Natasha Sheikh (N)

Oakville Trafalgar Memorial Hospital, Oakville, Ontario, Canada.

Joshua Mehta (J)

Critical Care Medicine Residency Program, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Rupal Shah (R)

Division of General Internal Medicine, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Faculty Member of the HoPingKong Centre for Excellence in Education and Practice, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Ryan Brydges (R)

Technology-Enabled Education at St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, CA.
Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH